2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forum‘Israeli-Occupied’ Congress No More
By ABRAHAM KATSMAN11/26/2012
For those of us in the pro-Israel camp who were disappointed by the reelection of President Barack Obama, theres more bad news.
While there is no dearth of analysis of the impact of the US presidential election on the America-Israel relationship, Israels military and diplomatic strategies or on Israels upcoming elections, analysis of the Congress that has just been elected has been in short supply.
And while the precise impact of this election is difficult to predict, there is one inescapable conclusion: The incoming 113th Congress to be sworn in this January is materially more left-leaning and materially less pro-Israel than the outgoing 112th.
Especially on the Democrats side.
MORE...
http://www.jpost.com/Opinion/Op-EdContributors/Article.aspx?id=293538
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)dennis4868
(9,774 posts)is that he implies that Obama is bad for Israel. The facts say something else entirely different. Obama has been one of the best presidents Israel could ever hope for.
garthranzz
(1,330 posts)since when did neocons or Republicans care about facts?
W. - let's see, 9/11, the intifada, the Hezbollah disaster in Lebanon, strengthening of Iran, Hamas in Gaza - oh, but he was so good for Israel because he wouldn't talk to Arafat.
And I think Obama's speech in Egypt during his first term, his response to Libya, and the Arab Spring, make dialogue possible.
That's not counting all the quiet support he's given.
Thank you!!
dennis4868
(9,774 posts)longship
(40,416 posts)chaska
(6,794 posts)of Israel this week. It's a must-read for both friends and foes of Israel.
And as I always say, John Michael Greer is the smartest man on the web.
http://thearchdruidreport.blogspot.com/2012/11/in-twilight-of-empires.html
democrattotheend
(11,607 posts)I thought posts about the Israeli/Palestinian conflict had to go there (except late breaking news) because of how divisive the issue is here.
Purveyor
(29,876 posts)Sadiedog
(353 posts)I`m afraid that I would be more than happy if aid to other Countries was decreased rather than give up more in social programs here at home. It irks me that this is never on the table yet Social Security is. Am I missing something. Also I am talking not just about aid to Israel.
no_hypocrisy
(46,244 posts)He was known to have spearheaded efforts behind the scenes to increase aid for Israels most critical defense programs and promote an ever-closer military alliance between Israel and the US. He was defeated in the primaries by Democrat and Israel critic Bill Pascrall in a campaign focused on Rothmans support for Israel or as his growing Arab constituency put it, loyalty to a foreign flag.
Clarification: I worked on Bill Pascrell's primary campaign with the WEDO women (Women Empowered Democratic Organization of Passaic County). We did countless hours of phone-banking, canvassing, and getting the vote out in several municipalities in both Bergen County and Passaic County. We did not "go there", meaning Israel, the growing Muslim communities in Paterson and Passaic. We stressed the hard work that our congressman has done and how he's delivered much federal aid and help to our communities. We introduced him to new towns in the reconfigured district. Even when there was a voter who didn't like Pascrell, he'd personally call them to find out what he could do better or differently.
Rothman decided to buy TV air time to run commercials about questioning Bill Pascrell's dedication to Israel, not Pascrell. (The republican candidate for the 9th district, Shmuley Boteach, followed Rothman's playbook and also unsuccessfully lost the debate and the election.) Pascrell was critical of Israel, but it wasn't wholesale; it was about particular issues that should be addressed without being called antisemitic or anti-Zionist.
Response to Purveyor (Original post)
Post removed
Codeine
(25,586 posts)Comrade_McKenzie
(2,526 posts)Carry on, comrade.
On the topic at hand: GOOD!
Arkana
(24,347 posts)This country could stand to be a little less pro-Israel and a little more pro-human rights.
Breathlessly defending everything Israel does because they're Israel isn't good foreign policy.
yellowcanine
(35,703 posts)Few of the neocons want to answer that question. IMO it has mainly encouraged hardliners in Israel and thwarted the peace process.
JiminyJominy
(340 posts)In this country in positions of power seem to have more of an allegience to Israel than to the USA.
leftynyc
(26,060 posts)Or are you content to hide behind the pathetic and cowardly fox news-like "some people say"?