2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumDick Durbin: Social Security Should Be Off The Fiscal Cliff Table
Social Security does not contribute to the federal deficit and should not be a part of ongoing negotiations to avoid the so-called fiscal cliff, Senate Majority Whip Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) said Tuesday, in a speech billed as a "major address making the progressive case for a bipartisan fiscal cliff deal."Durbin's line in the sand on Social Security reflects an increasingly aggressive effort by Democrats to block changes to the program.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/11/27/dick-durbin-social-security-fiscal-cliff_n_2199224.html
midnight
(26,624 posts)customerserviceguy
(25,183 posts)to reimburse the Social Security System for lost revenues during the two year tax holiday? Where did that come from?
If we ever get an economic recovery worthy of being called one, interest rates will rise, and the amount of interest that the Federal government has to pay for the trust fund specialized securities will also go up.
It's not as simple as it looks.
UCmeNdc
(9,601 posts)This week,however, Sen. Mark Begich (D-AK) put forward a reform package that goes in the opposite direction, while still financially securing the programs trust fund for roughly the next seven decades. The Washington Posts Dylan Matthews laid out the details:
The Begich bill would lift the current payroll tax cap, which exempts wages in excess of a certain amount ($110,100 this year) from the tax. In turn, it would give high earners, who would pay more, additional benefits upon retirement, just as benefits increase as wages do for workers below the cap.
It also increases benefits across-the-board. While Bowles-Simpson and Domenici-Rivlin adopt a stingier chained CPI measure for inflation, Begich adopts CPI-E, or a measure that specifically captures inflation in goods that seniors buy.
Due to deteriorated health and other considerations, goods seniors buy tend to be more expensive than those younger people purchase. Begichs CPI-E change would mean, effectively, a 4.5 percent benefit increase for the programs beneficiaries, including not just seniors but their designated survivors and disabled Americans as well.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10021871773
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)There is none. I see the media allowing Republicans to tell the lies they tell about SS without even questioning them. But if Dems unite in slapping down those lies, the media will be forced to at least ask Republicans to explain their lies in the future.