Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumFiscal Cliff, Day 21: You Call That a Compromise?
by Daniel Gross Nov 27, 2012 1:15 PM EST
As the fiscal cliff nears, some Republicans are backing off their anti-tax orthodoxybut theyre still living in the past. Daniel Gross on why the concessions aren't good enough.
Its Day 21 of the Fiscal Cliff Hostage Situation.
Three weeks after his reelection, President Obama is showing no signs that hes willing to release the Bush-era tax cuts from his grasp. In New York and elsewhere, CEOs are ordering up their private jets to ferry them to Washington for a White House meeting scheduled on Wednesday. Obama is hosting small-business owners too. Policy wonks are crunching numbers on potential solutions. And Republicans are getting antsy.
Indeed, the signs of desperation are rising. For 20 years, ever since President George H.W. Bush signed on to a deal to raise taxes, the orthodoxy has held that a Republican elected official can never talk about, accede to, wink at, or vote for a piece of legislation that would raise tax rates or tax revenues. The chief enforcer of this ideological rectitude has been Grover Norquist, president of Americans for Tax Reform, who has forced generations of Republicans to sign his no-tax pledge. Violators have faced often-fatal primary challenges.
But pledges cant release a hostage. And three weeks into the crisis, elected Republicans are finally waking up to the reality that if no evasive action is taken, tax rates on income, capital gains, and dividends will rise in just five weeks. Averting such an unwanted effect requires reaching a deal with President Obama and the Democrats. And reaching such a deal requires acknowledging a need for more revenues.
It took a while, but Republicans have started to throw Commissar Norquist under the bus. Last Wednesday, on the eve of Thanksgiving, Sen. Saxby Chambliss of Georgia said times have changed significantly, and I care more about my country than I do about a 20-year-old pledge. Appearing on ABCs This Week on Sunday, Sen. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina said he would be willing to violate the pledge for the good of the country. Rep. Peter King of New York echoed the sentiment.
-snip-
more:
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2012/11/27/fiscal-cliff-day-21-you-call-that-a-compromise.html
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 875 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (0)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Fiscal Cliff, Day 21: You Call That a Compromise? (Original Post)
DonViejo
Nov 2012
OP
Bernanke. It fits the Democrats and Republican narrative so they can both rob you.
boingboinh
Nov 2012
#2
Rosa Luxemburg
(28,627 posts)1. Who thought up the name 'fiscal cliff?'
boingboinh
(290 posts)2. Bernanke. It fits the Democrats and Republican narrative so they can both rob you.