Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kstewart33

(6,551 posts)
Sun Oct 30, 2016, 01:50 PM Oct 2016

Former federal prosecutor: The FBI does not need a warrant.

A "former federal public corruption prosecutor in high profile cases" sent an email to Josh Marshall at TPM. Here is a segment of the email. It's worth reading the complete email.

But here's the thing: They never needed to get a warrant. All they would have had to do is ask Huma's and/or Weiner's lawyers whether they would consent to the search (or accept service of a subpoena for the emails). And they surely would have given it, knowing full well that the alternative would be the FBI getting another search warrant and that leaking to the press. It is not unusual to ask for consent to search from subjects, especially when you have possession of the data. And if they say yes, it's the most defensible way to search as the subject will effectively be waiving any 4th Amendment challenge to the search. If they had done this simple step, they would have the emails by now and would have been able to de-dupe them against the emails they already had and have any new ones reviewed in short order. By doing so, they would also have been taking steps to minimize potential leaks.

I've generally been a big Comey fan, but I'm appalled at what's happened here. At the end of the day, the DOJ policies on not commenting on ongoing investigations are really important and should have been followed from the beginning. He acted prematurely here and, I think, irresponsibly by sending the letter, especially without knowing whether there was anything new. Many voters can't help but assume that the FBI must have found something new. Regardless, if you think you're in a no-win, fall back on the policy and make no comment. I think back to investigations of members of Congress that I handled and cannot fathom having my FBI agents make public comments about reviewing potential new evidence in real time less than two weeks before an election. It's just insane. Career destroying, Democracy distorting, insanity.

At this point, I think he has to say the following: (1) we have not seen any new evidence that changes our prior conclusion; (2) we do not know whether the new email collection involves any emails that were not previously reviewed in reaching our prior conclusion; and (3) we will refer all further questions on this matter to the DOJ.


Link: http://talkingpointsmemo.com/edblog/must-read--36

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Former federal prosecutor: The FBI does not need a warrant. (Original Post) kstewart33 Oct 2016 OP
The author is assuming that Abedin and Wiener weren't asked for permission. Wilms Oct 2016 #1
According to one reporter today Weiner has given the FBI permission... PoliticAverse Oct 2016 #2
All this mess makes it clear why the Clintons set up a server at home to start with!! Sancho Oct 2016 #3
 

Wilms

(26,795 posts)
1. The author is assuming that Abedin and Wiener weren't asked for permission.
Sun Oct 30, 2016, 01:57 PM
Oct 2016

How about if they were and refused??

That would have to be verified.

Sancho

(9,070 posts)
3. All this mess makes it clear why the Clintons set up a server at home to start with!!
Sun Oct 30, 2016, 02:06 PM
Oct 2016

Really, there was never anyway to trust internal government employees - especially the FBI, CIA, or NSA. They are partisan GOP operatives and will leak or make up anything to serve their masters.

Whether official business or personal wedding plans, there is no question that the only way to avoid the right-wing hack jobs is to put up a figurative and literal firewall from other government employees.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Former federal prosecutor...