2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumHow Hillary Clinton met Satan
by Susan Faludi
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/30/opinion/sunday/how-hillary-clinton-met-satan.html?action=click&pgtype=Homepage&clickSource=story-heading&module=opinion-c-col-top-region®ion=opinion-c-col-top-region&WT.nav=opinion-c-col-top-region
It was my third day at the Republican National Convention in 1996, and my notebook overflowed with a one-note theme: You do know that Hillary Clinton is funding the whole radical feminist agenda? She had Vince Foster killed. Shes behind many more murders than that. Its well-established that Hillary Clinton belonged to a satanic cult, still does. The consensus among Pat Buchanans supporters seemed ardent and universal, though the object of this obloquy wasnt even on the opposing ticket.
One of the mysteries of 2016 is the degree to which Hillary Clinton is reviled. Not just rationally opposed but viscerally and instinctively hated. None of the stated reasons for the animus seem to satisfy. Yes, shes careful and cagey, and her use of a private email server, which the F.B.I. flung back into the news on Friday, was a big mistake. But no, shes not more dishonest than other politicians, and compared with her opponent, shes George Washington. Her policies, even where bold, are hardly on the subversive fringe.
Yet shes cast not just as a political combatant but as a demon who, in the imaginings of Republicans like Paul D. Ryan, the speaker of the House, and Representative Trent Franks, would create an America where passion the very stuff of life is extinguished (the former) and where fetuses would be destroyed limb from limb (the latter).
Donald J. Trump and his supporters posit their antipathy as a reaction to Mrs. Clintons accumulated record over 30 years in power. Its important to recall that she was deranging Republicans on Day 1. Understanding her demonization requires admitting her full significance in our political history, for she is not simply a pioneering woman fighting an Ur-misogyny. Mrs. Clinton faces a two-headed Cerberus, an artificial conjoining that occurred in the early 1990s, of wounded Republican invincibility and wounded male prerogative. Our current political crisis wont be resolved until those forces are separated and the Cerberus slain.
SNIP
DURHAM D
(32,611 posts)That can only mean one thing -
Camile Paglia will be out "throwing" her support at Jill Stein in a few hours.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)Faludi's is extremely worth reading, though, which Paglia can't possibly achieve.
As for why the incredible hate, a big reason at this point is that the lower they need to follow a leader, the more they have to demonize the opposition to justify it. And at this point they're all emotionally and intellectually crawling on their bellies like reptiles.
Or Faludi's deeper explanation of what came first:
Few current observers seem to recall the wrath that greeted Bill Clintons ascension. ... to the right in 1992, it meant usurpation. Reaganism held almost religious significance, and its reign was supposed to be transformative and permanent. For the One True Way to be restored, Clintonism had to be delegitimized.