2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumThe Dangers of Donald Trump
The Dangers of Donald TrumpBy: Ross Douthat OCT. 29, 2016
(snip)
The first is sustained market jitters, leading to an economic slump. Trumps election alone would probably induce a Brexit-esque stock market dip, but the real problem would be what happened next. Instead of Theresa Mays steadiness inspiring a return to fundamentals, you would have the spectacle and it will be a spectacle of the same Trump team that drop-kicked its policy shop and barely organized a national campaign trying to staff up an administration. Even without his promised pivot to mercantilism and trade war, a White House run as a Trump production is likely to mainline anxiety into the economy, sidelining capital, discouraging hiring and shaving points off the G.D.P.
The second peril is major civil unrest. Some of Trumps supporters imagine that his election would be a blow to left-wing activists, that his administration would swiftly reverse the post-Ferguson crime increase. This is a bit like imagining that a President George Wallace would have been good for late-1960s civil peace. In reality, Trumps election would be a gift to bad cops and riot-ready radicals in equal measure, and his every intervention would pour gasoline on campuses and cities not least because as soon as any protest movement had a face or leader, Trump would be on cable bellowing ad hominems at them.
Sign Up for the Opinion Today Newsletter
The third likely highly-plausible peril, and by far the most serious, is a rapid escalation of risk in every geopolitical theater. Its probably true that Trump, given his pro-Russia line, would be somewhat less likely than Clinton to immediately stumble into confrontation with Vladimir Putin over Syria. But its silly to imagine Moscow slipping into a comfortable détente with a President Trump; Putin is more likely to pocket concessions and keep pushing, testing the orange-haired dealmaker at every opportunity and leaving Trump poised, very dangerously, between overreaction and his least-favorite position looking weak.
Thats just Russia: From the Pacific Rim to the Middle East, revisionist powers will set out to test Trumps capacity to handle surprise, hostile actors will seek to exploit the undoubted chaos of his White House, and our allies will build American fecklessness into their strategic plans. And again, all of this is likely to happen without Trump doing the wilder things hes kind-of sort-of pledged to do demanding tribute from allies, trying to take the oil, etc. He need only be himself in order to bring an extended period of risk upon the world.
(snip)
Garrett78
(10,721 posts)As Leonard Pitts wrote, defeat of Trump and other Republicans is not sufficient. They need to be annihilated. The dangers posed by Trump are numerous and profound. A Trump victory would only embolden the most vile among us, as I fear the acquittal of the Malheur occupiers will do.
I'm particularly concerned with the message that would be sent to persons of color if Trump were to win. It's bad enough that he'll get 40+ (or 50+) million votes.
As Obama said, it's cliche to talk about an election being the most important of one's lifetime but that it's really true in 2016.
classof56
(5,376 posts)As an Oregonian, I commend your decision to keep our state blue. As you pointed out, this election goes beyond choosing the lesser of two evils, as it's sometimes framed. It goes to the heart of our Republic, with the fact being, if Trump wins, it will be the end of the Republic, for the reasons stated in the OP. Bottom line is, our children and grandchildren's future is at stake. The very thought that 40-50+ million voters will cast their ballot for Trump makes me physically ill. I thank you for your commitment to my children's and grandchildren's future, tough as that choice might be.
Blessings.