Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forum
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
9 replies, 1548 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (13)
ReplyReply to this post
9 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Forget Nate Silver, The Onion nailed this prediction 4 years ago (Original Post)
PeaceNikki
Nov 2016
OP
I just reposted that on Facebook today. It came up as a Facebook memory from four years ago.
Silent3
Nov 2016
#4
TrekLuver
(2,573 posts)2. lol
Island Blue
(5,817 posts)3. Wow. It's spooky
how accurate that prediction was.
Silent3
(15,234 posts)4. I just reposted that on Facebook today. It came up as a Facebook memory from four years ago.
I was amazed how prescient the Onion was.
lapucelle
(18,275 posts)5. How prescient. At this point, the Onion should be the paper of record.
In 2006 they also nailed the gender-based concerns that would drive this election cycle's narrative.
http://www.theonion.com/blogpost/hillary-clinton-is-too-ambitious-to-be-the-first-f-11229
PeaceNikki
(27,985 posts)6. Wow - perfect!!
Thanks!!
niyad
(113,348 posts)7. woke up this morning, clock said 538 and my first thought was "my day is staring with nate
silver??? jeez"
smirkymonkey
(63,221 posts)9. Brilliant!