Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DonViejo

(60,536 posts)
Tue Nov 8, 2016, 08:13 AM Nov 2016

The Question for James Comey - by the New York Times Editorial Board

Never mind.

That was the message James Comey, the F.B.I. director, sent to Congress on Sunday in his latest headline-grabbing interruption of the 2016 presidential race.

Having dropped a bomb packed with innuendo on Oct. 28 when he informed Congress that there was a new stash of emails that “appear to be pertinent” to the investigation of Hillary Clinton’s use of a private email server, Mr. Comey had to dig himself out.

On Sunday, he reaffirmed his original decision in July to recommend against charging Mrs. Clinton for her careless handling of emails containing classified information when she was secretary of state. The new emails — on the computer of Anthony Weiner, the estranged husband of Mrs. Clinton’s close aide Huma Abedin — contain nothing except personal messages and duplicates of emails that had already been reviewed, investigators found. But you can’t unring a bell. The damage Mr. Comey’s back-and-forthing has done to the election, to his own reputation and to that of the F.B.I. is profound. Nine days of early voting passed after he made his rash announcement about the new emails, an announcement made when he and his investigators knew nothing about the content of those emails because they didn’t even have a search warrant. That was nine days during which millions of voters went to the polls under the false impression — created by Mr. Comey’s action — that there was new evidence against Mrs. Clinton, showing possible criminality.

Republicans who were full of gleeful praise for Mr. Comey only days ago are furious once again. “Comey must be under enormous political pressure to cave like this and announce something he can’t possibly know,” Newt Gingrich, an adviser to Donald Trump, wrote on Twitter. Mr. Trump himself had cited Mr. Comey’s courage last week, but on Sunday he told a rally: “You can’t review 650,000 emails in eight days. You can’t do it, folks.” (Memo to Mr. Trump from the average law firm associate: Yes, you can.)

-snip-

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/08/opinion/the-question-for-james-comey.html?emc=edit_th_20161108&nl=todaysheadlines&nlid=57435284
3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Question for James Comey - by the New York Times Editorial Board (Original Post) DonViejo Nov 2016 OP
I'm gonna' miss all this craziness...... MyOwnPeace Nov 2016 #1
Comey's initial letter dominated the news for a week; the revelation that there was nothing was in Chathamization Nov 2016 #2

MyOwnPeace

(16,928 posts)
1. I'm gonna' miss all this craziness......
Tue Nov 8, 2016, 09:28 AM
Nov 2016

but Madame President REALLY needs to send that guy walking (future mall cop?)


PS: Just kidding about "missing all the craziness!

Chathamization

(1,638 posts)
2. Comey's initial letter dominated the news for a week; the revelation that there was nothing was in
Tue Nov 8, 2016, 09:49 AM
Nov 2016

the news for less than 24 hours (it's pretty much gone from the main news pages now). If someone was busy Sunday night they would have easily missed it.

This is a pretty common right-wing tactic - remember when they media was telling everyone that the FBI was targeting conservatives? That was all over the news, but the revelation that it wasn't true was just briefly in the back pages.

The news media is complicit, though. They're only more than happy to start putting up tons of articles about any Republican rumor, and having the articles that contain the actual facts only get a small fraction of the space.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»The Question for James Co...