By the sound of things on Twitter, the data will be relayed in tiny little nuggets by talking heads on blogs and live streams, there will be no end user raw data access we can tab through ourselves... disappointing.

book_worm

(15,951 posts)

5. They have some Colorado data

Reply to idziak4ever1234 (Original post)

Tue Nov 8, 2016, 11:00 AM

Nov 2016

Early voting data from Colorado

The data:
•Clinton: 46 percent
•Trump: 44 percent
•Johnson: 7.2 percent

What it means: Colorado allows voters to mail in their ballots early, which gives us some early voting data to analyze. Of the 1.53 million total votes cast that we’ve been able to look at, Clinton is leading Trump 46 percent to 44 percent.

— Noah Kulwin

https://news.vice.com/story/live-election-day-turnout-results-with-votecastry?cl=fp

Democat

(11,617 posts)

6. Johnson's percentage is pretty huge

Reply to book_worm (Reply #5)

Tue Nov 8, 2016, 11:04 AM

Nov 2016

For a third party candidate.

book_worm

(15,951 posts)

7. I think he'll do comparatively well in the Western states

Reply to Democat (Reply #6)

Tue Nov 8, 2016, 11:05 AM

Nov 2016

and hopefully that will also hold down Trump's vote. But this is very early--a first wave.

Democat

(11,617 posts)

9. I wonder how many states he'll have more than the difference

Reply to book_worm (Reply #7)

Tue Nov 8, 2016, 11:09 AM

Nov 2016

between Clinton and Trump.

That will be another excuse for whoever loses. The right wing still likes to blame Ross Perot and of course we blame Nader.

LP2K12

(885 posts)

14. Well...

Reply to Democat (Reply #9)

Tue Nov 8, 2016, 11:43 AM

Nov 2016

Maybe they'll learn to choose a less divisive and vile candidate. It's not like they didn't have options in their circus.

Wrz

(35 posts)

12. Some data being provided here, vote counts

Reply to idziak4ever1234 (Original post)

Tue Nov 8, 2016, 11:34 AM

Nov 2016

Some data being provided here, vote counts

http://www.slate.com/votecastr_election_day_turnout_tracker.html

jzodda

(2,124 posts)

13. At 11am they will have updated totals at slate

Reply to idziak4ever1234 (Original post)

Tue Nov 8, 2016, 11:41 AM

Nov 2016

Till then try the vice news YouTube link

jzodda

(2,124 posts)

15. Keep this in mind

Reply to idziak4ever1234 (Original post)

Tue Nov 8, 2016, 11:44 AM

Nov 2016

I know some of you are very anxious so remember that rural areas usually report first and they will have a lot of trump in there. You won't get much of an idea of urban areas till later this afternoon or early evening. Some large metro areas like cleavland or Miami may not have totals till tonight.

whatthehey

(3,660 posts)

16. They seem to be assigning almost all of NV unaffiliated voters to Trump.

Reply to idziak4ever1234 (Original post)

Tue Nov 8, 2016, 12:15 PM

Nov 2016

If we trust the Ralston data, that 70000+ straight D to R lead has been dropped to 7000 here.

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)

18. Don't pay attention to any numbers you see before the first polls close.

Reply to idziak4ever1234 (Original post)

Tue Nov 8, 2016, 12:20 PM

Nov 2016

Good grief. Votecastr has zero history in the field.

andym

(5,444 posts)

19. Votecastr The latest election data from 8 swing states Updated: 11:36 a.m. E.T. via vice.com

Reply to idziak4ever1234 (Original post)

Tue Nov 8, 2016, 01:03 PM

Nov 2016

https://news.vice.com/story/live-election-day-turnout-results-with-votecastry

Colorado:

59.8 percent of expected total voters
Clinton: 46.3
Trump: 43.6

Iowa:

33.3 percent of expected total voters
Clinton: 48.5
Trump: 43.5

Wisconsin:

24.7 percent of expected total voters
Clinton: 52.7
Trump: 40.3

Nevada:

46.2 percent of expected total voters
Clinton: 46.7
Trump: 45.2

Ohio:

22.7 percent of expected total voters
Clinton: 47.9
Trump: 43.9

Florida:

52.4 percent of expected total voters
Clinton: 48.6
Trump: 45.2

Reply to this discussion