2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumFor those intererested: Latest data from Votecastr...
Florida
74.9 percent of expected total voters
Clinton: 49 percent
Trump: 45 percent
Colorado:
72.2 percent of expected total voters
Clinton: 47 percent
Trump: 42 percent
Iowa:
55.9 percent of expected total voters
Clinton: 45 percent
Trump: 46 percent
Wisconsin:
47.9 percent of expected total voters
Clinton: 49 percent
Trump: 43 percent
Nevada:
58.7 percent of expected total voters
Clinton: 47 percent
Trump: 44 percent
Ohio:
59.8 percent of expected total voters
Clinton: 46 percent
Trump: 45 percent
Pennsylvania
45.9 percent of expected total voters
Hillary: 48 percent
Trump: 44 percent
What it means: More than half of expected voters have already cast their ballots for president, and Hillary Clinton is on track to win key swing states barring a huge surge of Trump voters late in the day, according to VoteCastrs model.
https://news.vice.com/story/live-election-day-turnout-results-with-votecastry?cl=fp
beachbumbob
(9,263 posts)Not sure why any one paying attention to guessing...
grantcart
(53,061 posts)and he was pretty spot on.
We will see but the methodology is exactly what the campaigns are spending millions of dollars on.
joshcryer
(62,276 posts)But yeah this is kind of a make or break for this company, either they are getting a good idea, and good metrics, or they will be laughed at and relegated to obscurity. I still think their approach is interesting and hope among hopes that they are right, because wow, a blowout if they are right.
grantcart
(53,061 posts)Campaigns have been paying tens of millions of dollars for this type of information for the last 2 cycles. In some ways Romney's micro targeting was even better than Obamas.
They are showing very tight in PA, but you would expect that with no EV and the urban areas getting a lot of post work voting.
I think what it shows is that the GOTV, which uses the same data, is worth 3-5 points against a campaign that doesn't use it all. the Clinton campaign knows exactly what Democrats and likely independents have voted as per an hour ago and are phoning them right now. The Trump campaign has Rudy on the TV. I know where I would put my money.
Thanks for the welcome back
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)Not being knowledgeable about data analysis, I'm forced for look at other signs. Trump's very subdued affect at the polls suggests his own campaign data forced his team to burst the bubble they'd been keeping him in. At least that's my interpretation of that input.
grantcart
(53,061 posts)Hortensis
(58,785 posts)category, or whether we'd be folded into the suburban category. We'd fit tidily into a "retired without pensions" group.
We're seeing results of microtargeting in our email, of course. My husband, who is registered Republican to have his say in the primary, actually gets very little right-wing messaging. A few calls, etc., from apparently data-challenged groups only.
grantcart
(53,061 posts)I will do a search for a product for Golden Retrievers and for months will see ads for GR products and ads with pictures of GR in them. Its kind of spooky.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)being teased by come-ons for a $350 yellow 7.5-quart Cuisinart Dutch oven that just isn't happening. Even for Christmas.
Any idea what data categories might be in the profiles compiled by the candidates, beyond the obvious/expected? Would Hillary discover I like to cook if she checked mine?
stamp the rooster
(24 posts)I started drinking beer and listening to Peace Train at 5pm on Election Day in 2004. Only to vomit later.
Habibi
(3,598 posts)I prematurely popped open a bottle of champagne. Very prematurely.
grantcart
(53,061 posts)Microtargeting only really began nationally in the 2008 campaign.
This has nothing to do with exit polls and the information that was released in 2004.
Response to beachbumbob (Reply #1)
stamp the rooster This message was self-deleted by its author.