Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumTrump owes his election to the same fluke factors as W: Liberal complacency and media nonsense
History repeats itself: Howd things go so wrong in 2016? Look back at 2000Donald Trump owes his election to the same fluke factors as George W. Bush: Liberal complacency and media nonsense
AMANDA MARCOTTE
Election postmortems drag on and all sorts of angles, with varying degrees of plausibility, are being examined for how things went so horribly wrong: Racism, sexism, disaffected rural white voters standing next to delightfully photographable tractors. But one potential explanation continues to be overlooked: Voter complacency.
Or, more specifically, Democratic voter complacency. Contrary to headlines suggesting that a sudden rush of previously checked-out white voters rushed to the polls, Donald Trumps actual numbers dont exceed what Mitt Romney got in 2012 by very much. Trump has fewer than 200,000 new voters, which means he got the Pepe the Frog morons who had probably never registered to vote before this and not much else. But Hillary Clinton currently stands at 3.5 million fewer votes than Barack Obama got in 2012.
Many are rushing forward now, of course, to say that was because Clinton was a uniquely uninspiring candidate, which is to say they are projecting their own sexist reasons for disliking Clinton onto the public at large. Thomas Frank of the Guardian writes that Clinton was exactly the wrong candidate for this angry, populist moment and suggests the Democrats should have run Joe Biden, with his powerful plainspoken style. Because nothing says populist hero like Bidens vote for a bill undermining the right to declare bankruptcy a bill that Hillary Clinton asked her husband not to sign. (He didnt.)
But sure, lots of people probably stayed home because theyre threatened by women in authority, whether they rationalized it by pretending Biden is some populist outsider or not. But its also worth noting that this election, despite the big honking Voldemort-as-a-game-show-host character at the center of it, played out almost identically to the infamous presidential election of 2000, and with the same result: Huge swaths of Democratic voters got sick of the whole thing and just stayed home rather than participate.
more
http://www.salon.com/2016/11/18/history-repeats-itself-howd-things-go-so-wrong-in-2016-look-back-at-2000/
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
1 replies, 188 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (1)
ReplyReply to this post
1 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Trump owes his election to the same fluke factors as W: Liberal complacency and media nonsense (Original Post)
DonViejo
Nov 2016
OP
Wilms
(26,795 posts)1. "...a bill that Hillary Clinton asked her husband not to sign..."
Well, that was back then. More recently...
The Vote for Bankruptcy Reform that Haunts Hillary Clinton
snip
In a 2003 book, The Two-Income Trap, Ms. Warren offered a stinging portrayal of how, by her account, Mrs. Clinton changed her views.
Had the bill been transformed to get rid of all those awful provisions that had so concerned First Lady Hillary Clinton? No, Ms. Warren wrote. The bill was essentially the same, but Hillary Rodham Clinton was not.
snip
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/02/07/us/politics/the-vote-for-bankruptcy-reform-that-haunts-hillary-clinton.html
snip
In a 2003 book, The Two-Income Trap, Ms. Warren offered a stinging portrayal of how, by her account, Mrs. Clinton changed her views.
Had the bill been transformed to get rid of all those awful provisions that had so concerned First Lady Hillary Clinton? No, Ms. Warren wrote. The bill was essentially the same, but Hillary Rodham Clinton was not.
snip
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/02/07/us/politics/the-vote-for-bankruptcy-reform-that-haunts-hillary-clinton.html