I do not know what happened.

in PA, county that have not voted R switched to Trump, and HRC lost by 20 points... Check Luzerne County.

I posted above this last week:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/12512617195

I saw your post last week. It was a great post. There are too many indications that the election was hacked. Please call the DOJ. I will call tomorrow morning. Calling works when enough people do it. If all DUers call tomorrow, it will send a strong message. We need this election investigated.

They are not going to launch an investigation because enough people call in. This isn't american idol.

People have a right to demand that their votes be counted and that everything is done properly. If you had read the link, you would know that there are oddities in the results that suggest that hacking did take place.

Thanks for the condescension, by the way. It has earned you a place on my ignore list, as I don't tolerate people who cannot make an argument without resorting to insults, personal attacks, or condescension. As it happens, I have never watched an episode of American Idol and had no idea that it involved making calls. Not that that's in any way relevant to the topic at hand.

Given that there are indications that the election was stolen, if there is no investigation, people will have even less incentive to vote in future elections. How can we go door to door and ask people to vote if, when their votes get stolen, no one will even bother to investigate?

The deadline to request a recount in WI is Friday, I think. We all have to call tomorrow.

other than in the minds of people who just can't accept that Hillary Clinton lost to Donald Trump.

You know if it had gone the other way, there would be Trump supporters doing the same and everyone here would be laughing at them.

link:http://www.democraticunderground.com/12512620546

http://www.democraticunderground.com/12512620546

I am sure you can find a lot more

https://www.truthexaminer.com/2016/11/breaking-recounts-called-for-in-michigan-pennsylvania-wisconsin-its-not-over-details/


"According to New York Magazine, a group of computer scientists and election lawyers are urging Hillary Clinton to call for a recount of the votes in Pennsylvania, Wisconsin and Michigan.
From New York Magazine:
Hillary Clinton is being urged by a group of prominent computer scientists and election lawyers to call for a recount in three swing states won by Donald Trump, New York has learned. The group, which includes voting-rights attorney John Bonifaz and J. Alex Halderman, the director of the University of Michigan Center for Computer Security and Society, believes they’ve found persuasive evidence that results in Wisconsin, Michigan, and Pennsylvania may have been manipulated or hacked. The group is so far not speaking on the record about their findings and is focused on lobbying the Clinton team in private.




Last Thursday, the activists held a conference call with Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta and campaign general counsel Marc Elias to make their case, according to a source briefed on the call. The academics presented findings showing that in Wisconsin, Clinton received 7 percent fewer votes in counties that relied on electronic-voting machines compared with counties that used optical scanners and paper ballots. Based on this statistical analysis, Clinton may have been denied as many as 30,000 votes; she lost Wisconsin by 27,000. While it’s important to note the group has not found proof of hacking or manipulation, they are arguing to the campaign that the suspicious pattern merits an independent review — especially in light of the fact that the Obama White House has accused the Russian government of hacking the Democratic National Committee.
This is obviously a huge deal, but let’s not get our hopes up."

Donald Trump, who've we've been told for the last two years is the most politically inept candidate ever nominated for the Presidency managed to beat the most qualified candidate for the Presidency ever in a game of 10 dimensional chess by accusing her of trying to steal the election so that she would say the election can't be stolen so that he could steal and she would have to be silent?

Seriously? If that's truly the case, and I don't buy for a second that it is, then he obviously isn't as inept and she isn't as smart as we've all been led to believe.

I am not even going to ask you to explain how such an "inept" Trump managed to win the Republican nomination. You've already made misstatements in your post (what Clinton said was not that the election cannot be stolen but rather that the candidates must accept the outcome of the election).

Welcome to ignore. And enjoy your time under President Trump.

to an agency that says they aren't doing anything about the calls that are coming in.

Thanks for the advice!

You? Other than over this whole "the DOJ is tallying our phone calls!!11!" thing, that is.

It comes from his sales experience.
No doubt about it.

Then, when he ends up winning, he could attack Hillary for being hypocritical if Hillary contested the result.

By refusing to agree to accept the results in advance, it would be harder to complain if Hillary did so.

is that it would look hypocritical for Hillary to not accept the results of the election now, after having criticized Trump for saying he wouldn't accept the results of the election if he lost.

Of course, it's not, in fact, hypocritical. There is a difference between saying in advance that one will not accept a loss, and saying, in the light of evidence, that the results look suspect and should be investigated. But that's a subtle difference for most people.