She hasn't been the one pushing for this.

I feel good that we had 2 million more votes than cheeto did.

others are.

Trump would have her arrested on Inauguration Day if the recount didn't change anything.

Stein is in the perfect position to lead on this.

there might be insufficient evidence of computer hacking.

But our election process was damned well hacked by the Roberts' Supreme Court gutting of the Voting Rights Act.

Not to mention the instances of voter caging and the false "election security" of suppressive voter ID laws.

Computer hacking is only one component, it's not the whole thing.


.

but nothing can be done about that for this election.

election fraud, no deadlines and time limits.

It requires evidence, not phone calls or 'creative speculation.'

https://www.justice.gov/criminal/pin

They got a whole "book" on it!

https://www.justice.gov/sites/default/files/criminal/legacy/2013/09/30/electbook-rvs0807.pdf

"The hackers would have had to begin their work in advance of the election."

So suddenly the hackers from Russia had breached how many accounts before the election, but suddenly there is NO evidence there was hacking involved anywhere? I have a hard time believe the Daily Beast.

Most of the talk around it is coming from here, Reddit and Huffington Post.

Hillary is not making any such claim, nor will she.

There are plenty of things to apologize to Mrs. Clinton for. This is not one of them.

Yes, except when the officials are RWNJs. Basically Mr Becker is talking out of his ass and to check his reassurances the author phoned up a few election officials in WI, MI and PA who assured him that they would have detected any problems. Fine, but the fate of the world is hanging on the dubious results of their election systems so surely they won't object to having their tabulations audited?

Okay they will but let's take every possible precaution that the law allows eh?

...the word "fans" although it may be in the original article. I consider myself a "Hillary Clinton supporter..." and/or a "Bernie Sanders supporter..." etcetera...

I am not a "fan" of any politician, although there are several whom I supported. In 2016, I wholeheartedly supported Hillary Clinton.

Whatever the election result in the rigged and archaic Electoral College, I consider her the "winner" by more than two million votes! I will never accept Trump and will never - ever - refer to him as President. Period.

seem to disagree.
This ass wad will never be president on the west coast or in my house.

Still hoping he chokes to death on a turkey bone.

on a turkey bone.

Hacking computers would require a lot of people who would have no way of stopping themselves of bragging about their accomplishments.
No elections are rigged with voter role purges, ID laws the felon disenfranchisement.

Last edited Wed Nov 23, 2016, 10:26 PM - Edit history (1)

"I don’t believe that either one of these seemingly unlikely explanations is overwhelmingly more likely than the other.”

The problem with a successful election heist is there is no evidence after the fact. That's the first thing you have to get through your head. We trust people to count votes, and machines, and code we can't read because a corporation owns it. And, never mind who owns the corporation, but their private business is more important than transparency. We are left with the numbers they report and talking heads telling us to move along whenever the numbers don't pass inspection. We are also left with the knowledge that under 100,000 votes, possibly only 50,000, decided the electoral college in any two or three of six key battleground races where the polling and exit polling was both rigorous and matched.

Checking every so often keeps people honest.