Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumHacked or Not, Audit This Election (And All Future Ones) - Wired
After an election marred by hacker intrusions that breached the Democratic National Committee and the email account of one of Hillary Clintons top staffers, Americans are all too ready to believe that their actual votes have been hacked, too. Now those fears have been stoked by a team of security experts, who argue that voting machine vulnerabilities mean Clinton should demand recounts in key states.
<snip>
...a statistical audit of electronic voting results in key states as a routine safeguardnot just an emergency measurewould be a surprisingly simple way to ease serious, lingering doubts about Americas much-maligned electoral security. Auditing ought to be a standard part of the election process, says Ron Rivest, a cryptographer and computer science professor at MIT. It ought to be a routine thing as much as a doctor washing his hands.
<snip>
Election security experts still agree with Haldermans underlying argument: that auditing elections would help to settle dangerous, persistent uncertainty in a system potentially plagued by hackers. Theyre not as taxing as a full recount. And, importantly, they shouldnt solely be deployed as an emergency provision in contested elections, but rather a default part of the process. MITs Rivest quotes his computer scientist colleague at George Washington University, Poorvi Vora: Brush your teeth. Eat your spinach. Audit your elections.
- Wired
<snip>
...a statistical audit of electronic voting results in key states as a routine safeguardnot just an emergency measurewould be a surprisingly simple way to ease serious, lingering doubts about Americas much-maligned electoral security. Auditing ought to be a standard part of the election process, says Ron Rivest, a cryptographer and computer science professor at MIT. It ought to be a routine thing as much as a doctor washing his hands.
<snip>
Election security experts still agree with Haldermans underlying argument: that auditing elections would help to settle dangerous, persistent uncertainty in a system potentially plagued by hackers. Theyre not as taxing as a full recount. And, importantly, they shouldnt solely be deployed as an emergency provision in contested elections, but rather a default part of the process. MITs Rivest quotes his computer scientist colleague at George Washington University, Poorvi Vora: Brush your teeth. Eat your spinach. Audit your elections.
- Wired
Jill Stein's recount fund link
https://jillstein.nationbuilder.com/recount
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 1159 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (8)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Hacked or Not, Audit This Election (And All Future Ones) - Wired (Original Post)
ffr
Nov 2016
OP
cilla4progress
(24,736 posts)1. Done!
Thanks for posting!
Madam45for2923
(7,178 posts)2. I really like WIRED!
bhikkhu
(10,718 posts)3. Can't agree enough
And I think the traditional thing that only candidates have standing to call for recounts is boneheaded wrong. Voters should have the absolute right to know their votes are properly counted.