Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

mia

(8,361 posts)
Fri Nov 25, 2016, 11:08 AM Nov 2016

How Russia Pulled Off the Biggest Election Hack in U.S. History

http://www.esquire.com/news-politics/a49791/russian-dnc-emails-hacked/

On an April afternoon earlier this year, Russian president Vladimir Putin headlined a gathering of some four hundred journalists, bloggers, and media executives in St. Petersburg. Dressed in a sleek navy suit, Putin looked relaxed, even comfortable, as he took questions. About an hour into the forum, a young blogger in a navy zip sweater took the microphone and asked Putin what he thought of the "so-called Panama Papers."

The blogger was referring to a cache of more than eleven million computer files that had been stolen from Mossack Fonseca, a Panamanian law firm. The leak was the largest in history, involving 2.6 terabytes of data, enough to fill more than five hundred DVDs. On April 3, four days before the St. Petersburg forum, a group of international news outlets published the first in a series of stories based on the leak, which had taken them more than a year to investigate. The series revealed corruption on a massive scale: Mossack Fonseca's legal maneuverings had been used to hide billions of dollars. A central theme of the group's reporting was the matryoshka doll of secret shell companies and proxies, worth a reported $2 billion, that belonged to Putin's inner circle and were presumed to shelter some of the Russian president's vast personal wealth.

When Putin heard the blogger's question, his face lit up with a familiar smirk. He nodded slowly and confidently before reciting a litany of humiliations that the United States had inflicted on Russia. Putin reminded his audience about the sidelining of Russia during the 1998 war in Kosovo and what he saw as American meddling in Ukraine more recently. Returning to the Panama Papers, Putin cited WikiLeaks to insist that "officials and state agencies in the United States are behind all this." The Americans' aim, he said, was to weaken Russia from within: "to spread distrust for the ruling authorities and the bodies of power within society."

Though a narrow interpretation of Putin's accusation was defensible—as WikiLeaks had pointed out, one of the members of the Panama Papers consortium had received financial support from USAID, a federal agency—his swaggering assurance about America's activities has a more plausible explanation: Putin's own government had been preparing a vast, covert, and unprecedented campaign of political sabotage against the United States and its allies for more than a year....


17 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

BlueCaliDem

(15,438 posts)
1. Yep. And Putin outsmarted the U.S., stole data, most likely hacked voting machines via
Fri Nov 25, 2016, 11:27 AM
Nov 2016

the unsecured computers that are connected to the internet that also upload ballot designs into our voting machines, and installed Trump.

And NO Democrat - and NO Republican - has come out to stop him, paralyzed by their partisanship and fear of looking partisan.

And so we're stuck with Putin's puppet who is going to destroy this country in his first year while gearing up for a new war, this time against Iran. I say this with confidence because when a Republican is president, we always seem to launch new wars.

After a disastrous eight years (and make no mistake, when Trump is inaugurated, we're looking at a full eight years of a Republican president, either Trump or Pence if they successfully impeach and remove him), when the economy is on the verge of collapsing again and we're mired in yet another war in the M.E., then we'll be allowed to have another Democratic president to clean up the Republicans' mess...and the cycle starts all over again: Republicans fuck up this country and economy and a Democrat miraculously wins the EC and popular vote and is elected to clean up their country-destroying shit, then a Republican is elected again (the M$M propagating that people don't want the same Party and will choose the other Party just for shits and giggles), and so forth and so on.

LisaL

(44,973 posts)
2. Putin is a smart man.
Fri Nov 25, 2016, 11:28 AM
Nov 2016

It takes a lot of effort to stay in power in Russia. And he certainly managed.

CrispyQ

(36,470 posts)
5. There may not be much to salvage, at the end of the republican cycle, this time.
Fri Nov 25, 2016, 11:57 AM
Nov 2016

These bullies lied, cheated & stole to get in power & they aren't giving up that power easily. They control all houses of government, close to a majority of the state legislators & they get a SCOTUS nom right out of the shoot, while the dems stand around claiming the high ground & that they won the popular vote. The damage Pence/McConnell/Ryan will do in 2-4 years is going to be monumental. Personally, I think we are fucked beyond Pluto & my anger toward the democratic party is almost apocalyptic. The dems have been doing the shit in this cartoon for 35 years. Vote for the lesser of two evils, we were told & look where the fuck it got us.



KewlKat

(5,624 posts)
6. May I suggest another excellent article also from Esquire on the Russian ExPat that has been trying
Fri Nov 25, 2016, 12:07 PM
Nov 2016

to help us all. It's hard to pick and choose what to paste here. The ENTIRE article is a must read. It explains alot about the mindset of our government and why there has been no push for an audit/recount. FEAR.


The Russian Expat Leading the Fight to Protect America

http://www.esquire.com/news-politics/a49902/the-russian-emigre-leading-the-fight-to-protect-america/
Oct 24,2016
In a war against hackers, Dmitri Alperovitch and CrowdStrike are our special forces (and Putin's worst nightmare).

snips -

Alperovitch initially thought that the leaks were standard espionage and that Guccifer's attacks on CrowdStrike were just a noisy reaction to being busted. "I thought, Okay, they got really upset that they were caught," he said. But after documents from the DNC continued to leak, Alperovitch decided the situation was far worse than that. He concluded that the Russians wanted to use the leaked files to manipulate U. S. voters—a first. "It hit me that, holy crap, this is an influence operation. They're actually trying to inject themselves into the election," he said. "I believe that we may very well wake up on the morning the day after the election and find statements from Russian adversaries saying, 'Do not trust the result.' "


Days later, Alperovitch got a call from a Reuters reporter asking whether the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee had been hacked. CrowdStrike had, in fact, been working on a breach at the DCCC; once again, Alperovitch believed that Russia was responsible. Now, however, he suspected that only Fancy Bear was involved. A lawyer for the DCCC gave Alperovitch permission to confirm the leak and to name Russia as the suspected author.


"I remember getting off that call feeling completely outraged," he said. "I called up Shawn. I'm like, 'I can't believe the Russians are getting away with it. These are congresspeople. I can't believe that there's still no response from this government.' "

Alperovitch's friends in government told him privately that an official attribution so close to the election would look political. If the government named Russia, it would be accused of carrying water for Hillary Clinton. The explanations upset Alperovitch. The silence of the American government began to feel both familiar and dangerous. "It doesn't help us if two years from now someone gets indicted," he said. After Michelle Obama's passport was published online, on September 22, Alperovitch threw up his hands in exasperation. "That is Putin giving us the finger," he told me.

mia

(8,361 posts)
8. The support of one candidate at the expense of the other and the manipulation of public opinion...
Fri Nov 25, 2016, 12:25 PM
Nov 2016

On October 12, Putin appeared at another forum, this time with more than five hundred guests in Moscow. Sitting comfortably in front of a giant banner that said russia calling! he answered an audience question about the hacks. "Everyone is talking about who did it," Putin said. "Is it so important?" The former KGB officer, proving his full command of U. S. political intrigue, suggested that the Democrats had "supported one intraparty candidate at the expense of the other." Any talk of the hacks being in Russia's interest, he said, was "hysteria" intended to distract Americans from what the hackers discovered: "the manipulation of public opinion." When the audience applauded, a smirk returned to Putin's face. "I think I answered your question," he said..


The DNC's fault?

LisaL

(44,973 posts)
9. Oh for crying out loud.
Fri Nov 25, 2016, 12:27 PM
Nov 2016

Do you really think Putin cares about that in particular? Only if he can use that issue to divide the party. And what exactly is propaganda if not manipulation of public opinion? So all of the sudden you think Putin would be upset about manipulation of public opinion by DNC?

mia

(8,361 posts)
11. The excerpt suggests that Putin wasn't "upset about manipulation of public opinion by DNC".
Fri Nov 25, 2016, 01:03 PM
Nov 2016

He found it amusing and self-serving.

LisaL

(44,973 posts)
16. Yes, of course.
Fri Nov 25, 2016, 02:03 PM
Nov 2016

Putin is upset at US foreign policy toward Russia, not DNC supposedly preferring one candidate over the other.

KewlKat

(5,624 posts)
10. From another article about your subject in the OP,
Fri Nov 25, 2016, 12:48 PM
Nov 2016

I like the way Dmitri thinks -

For Alperovitch, a Russian-born American citizen, calling out hackers, and the nation-states that sponsor them, isn’t just part of the job. “When I see something like Russian intelligence services interfering with our electoral process, I find that incredibly offensive,” Alperovitch says. He sees defending his clients from foreign cyber threats as synonymous with defending Western values like private property and freedom of speech. But the groups and governments behind those threats are becoming increasingly adept at cyberwarfare, Alperovitch warns, and the United States is vulnerable. Only by adopting a muscular policy, Alperovitch says—by chasing down hackers and applying sanctions—can America win the war online.

JHan

(10,173 posts)
12. And this should piss off every american
Fri Nov 25, 2016, 01:20 PM
Nov 2016

Putin now has a useful fool in Trump.

And for those against the TPP - Trump's position on the TPP will now give Russia and China room to impose greater influence in the pacific region and latin america. And Bannon's bullshit American Nationalism clap trap and anti-trade hysteria could see us become isolationist and obsolete on the world stage.

Good job America.

http://money.cnn.com/2016/11/23/news/economy/tpp-trump-america-china-russia/

 

FairWinds

(1,717 posts)
13. Well, I am not in favor of Russia's apparent meddling in US elections, but . .
Fri Nov 25, 2016, 01:36 PM
Nov 2016

where was the outrage when the USG interfered in other countries' elections
(including those of Ukraine) with tactics up to and including murder.

The USG has done this dozens of times - just ask the Chileans, Brazilians,
and many others.

This is what American "exceptionalism" really means, you get all hissey when
other countries do what you have done forever.

Veterans For Peace

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»How Russia Pulled Off the...