Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DonViejo

(60,536 posts)
Wed Jan 16, 2013, 03:03 PM Jan 2013

Filibuster Reformers Coalesce Around Reid’s More Modest Reform Plan

SAHIL KAPUR JANUARY 16, 2013, 12:30 PM

The filibuster reform endgame is coming into focus.

Reformers are closing ranks behind a more modest proposal by Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) that they believe could pass with a 51-vote threshold when the Senate returns next week and chip away at the minority party’s power to obstruct. It represents a concession that the full “talking filibuster” they want may not happen. But by accepting the emerging Reid proposal, reformers are warding off a competing plan that they consider even weaker than Reid’s.

Leaders of Fix The Senate Now, an outside pro-reform coalition, are accepting the modest approach, wary of seeing the whole effort collapse.

“We’re optimistic that some good changes are going to happen,” said Shane Larson, the legislative director for Communications Workers For America, whose group has already spent more than $300,000 on TV ads in the D.C. area pushing filibuster reform. “We’re very optimistic that we’re going to get there, that we’ll have 51 votes to put this through.”

Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR) says he’s still fighting for the talking filibuster and believes it can pass. His aide said he isn’t convinced the Reid plan would take on the core problems of the Senate, but Merkley didn’t rule it out.

-snip-

http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2013/01/filibuster-endgame-in-sight.php?ref=fpblg

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Filibuster Reformers Coalesce Around Reid’s More Modest Reform Plan (Original Post) DonViejo Jan 2013 OP
Kick! n/t Tx4obama Jan 2013 #1
that's our dems always allowing things to be watered down so as not to piss off the republicans leftyohiolib Jan 2013 #2
The Founding Fathers never intended for filibusters to be a tool to prevent debate of legislation shawn703 Jan 2013 #3
Fools are giving it all away stultusporcos Jan 2013 #4
Nooooooo! Proud Liberal Dem Jan 2013 #5
Why TF did they even bother! SouthernDonkey Jan 2013 #6
 

leftyohiolib

(5,917 posts)
2. that's our dems always allowing things to be watered down so as not to piss off the republicans
Wed Jan 16, 2013, 03:36 PM
Jan 2013

i dont really mean that i just wanted the talking filibuster

shawn703

(2,702 posts)
3. The Founding Fathers never intended for filibusters to be a tool to prevent debate of legislation
Wed Jan 16, 2013, 03:39 PM
Jan 2013

It's funny how the Republicans like to talk about what they believed to be the intentions of the Founding Fathers when it supports their theocratic or racist views, but forget about them when it comes to how laws are supposed to be passed in this country.

 

stultusporcos

(327 posts)
4. Fools are giving it all away
Wed Jan 16, 2013, 08:10 PM
Jan 2013

Pubs will not change, they cannot be trusted with anything on anything, not a single one, they and thier supporters are evil and vile to the corei

SouthernDonkey

(256 posts)
6. Why TF did they even bother!
Wed Jan 16, 2013, 11:19 PM
Jan 2013

It's almost as if they really didn't give a shit about it to begin with. What a bunch of empty nutsacks! Good changes?? What a laugh.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Filibuster Reformers Coal...