Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumThe plot to derail Chuck Hagel
The demands Republicans are making -- and the threat behind them -- create a troubling precedent
BY STEVE KORNACKI
There are two ways of looking at Senate Armed Service Committee Chairman Carl Levins surprise decision to postpone an expected vote on Chuck Hagels nomination for Defense secretary.
Most likely, Levin is simply trying to deny Republicans an excuse to vote against Hagel, whose confirmation had seemed assured earlier this week when John McCain and several other influential Senate Republicans ruled out the use of a filibuster. With a committee vote on Thursday looming, though, 25 Republicans including all 12 GOP members of the committee signed a letter demanding that it be put off.
At issue are requests that several Republican senators made during Hagels hearings last week for transcripts of all of his paid speeches and for records of any foreign funding received by businesses or organizations that Hagel has done work with. On Tuesday, Hagel informed the committee that he had made his best effort to provide the speech transcripts, but that some of his engagements had been private off-the-record affairs for which no texts or recordings are available. And he maintained that hes not in position to provide any information about the funding for the companies hes worked with, citing an obligation to maintain the confidentiality of non-public corporate information.
This prompted the GOP senators to write their letter, and late Wednesday Levin announced that the committees review of the nomination is not yet complete but that he still intends to hold a vote as soon as possible.
more:
http://www.salon.com/2013/02/07/the_plot_to_derail_chuck_hagel/
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 966 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (2)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The plot to derail Chuck Hagel (Original Post)
DonViejo
Feb 2013
OP
LOL, I see comments like yours all over the web, all saying the same thing, but
TwilightGardener
Feb 2013
#2
Zedadiah
(3 posts)1. I don't get it.
I thought the whole point of nominating Hagel was to put up someone that would breeze through. This guy is a disaster by ANYONE's scoresheet. Why the sudden loyalty for this Republican? Or are we so caught up in partisanship, we just knee-jerk defend anything the other team opposes? Dump this clown and call Colin Powell if you want a Republican!
TwilightGardener
(46,416 posts)2. LOL, I see comments like yours all over the web, all saying the same thing, but
demanding "Jim Webb" or "Michelle Fluornoy", but yes, sometimes Colin Powell. Interesting. Hagel isnt' a disaster, the opposition to him is in a panic. They know he will be a great SecDef. Edit to add: you must know nothing about DU, either, or you would know that Colin Powell is not well received here.
leveymg
(36,418 posts)3. AIPAC strikes back. That and the GOP hawks are pissed at Hagel for his criticism of Bush's Iraq War
fiasco.