Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DonViejo

(60,536 posts)
Fri Feb 8, 2013, 01:03 PM Feb 2013

A New GOP? Not Yet - by Michael Tomasky



Feb 7, 2013 11:12 AM EST

Why it’s going to take four more years before Republicans truly hit rock bottom—and begin moving back to the center. By Michael Tomasky.


You remember the famous Bertolt Brecht line about how the government should just “dissolve the people and elect another”? I keep thinking about it as I read more and more about the Republican attempts at redefinition—Eric Cantor’s speech, Karl Rove’s new group, Fox’s quasi makeover, Marco Rubio’s beer with Ben Smith, and so on. They have all these fancy ideas about how to rebrand. But they can have all the fancy ideas they want. They still have an electoral base that sees politics basically as an arena to exact revenge for a series of resentments and grudges. Until they change that, they are stuck—and it isn’t happening anytime soon.

Cantor’s “Make Life Work” speech Tuesday was more about repackaging than rethinking. He put forward one actually excellent idea, for which I give him credit. He proposed that colleges be required to make public data revealing employment and earning patterns among their graduates. Universities fear this to death, for reasons that education expert Kevin Carey explained in an article in the journal I edit, Democracy, as it could ultimately lead to a reduction in tuition costs.

So I applaud that one. Otherwise, the ideas ranged from OK to largely irrelevant to done before to actively bad. You’ve got to hold on to your wallet any time a Republican talks about “modernizing” Medicare. Endorsing a path to citizenship for DREAM Act recipients is fine, but small potatoes. It is interesting, though, as E.J. Dionne observed, that Cantor was mostly playing on the Democrats’ side of the field, talking about using government to improve people’s lives. Noted.

The Rove–Tea Party feud is a joyous thing to watch. Rove, after an utterly disastrous run around the track in 2012, is now suckering people into writing him checks for a new outfit that will allegedly hold the zanies at bay, filter out the Sharron Angles and Richard Mourdocks of the world, and promote electable conservatives.

more
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2013/02/07/a-new-gop-not-yet.html
3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
A New GOP? Not Yet - by Michael Tomasky (Original Post) DonViejo Feb 2013 OP
Should the G.O.P be outlawed? S.A.M Feb 2013 #1
Not sure how long it's gonna take zappaman Feb 2013 #2
Would the Cantor speech mentioned happen to be the one Proud Liberal Dem Feb 2013 #3
 

S.A.M

(162 posts)
1. Should the G.O.P be outlawed?
Fri Feb 8, 2013, 02:29 PM
Feb 2013

Why not? They (Republicans) outlawed the Communist Party USA in the 50's.

Proud Liberal Dem

(24,414 posts)
3. Would the Cantor speech mentioned happen to be the one
Fri Feb 8, 2013, 03:59 PM
Feb 2013

he supposedly (largely) plagiarized from President Obama? Bottom line is that NOTHING the Republicans *say* is going to matter if they decide to keep pushing the same kinds of regressive policies at the local, state, and federal level. When they start cranking out some reasonable policy proposals, maybe then- and only then- will I pay any attention.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»A New GOP? Not Yet - by M...