Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ucrdem

(15,512 posts)
Sun Feb 10, 2013, 06:39 AM Feb 2013

Drones: are we shooting the messenger?

Remember James Bond, the guy we shell out 15 bucks a pop to watch extra-judicially blow away evil perps? That's MI5, but US presidents have been granted the same peace-time authority since the CIA was chartered by Congress in 1947, authorizing clandestine and covert operations: http://www.allgov.com/departments/independent-agencies/central-intelligence-agency-cia?agencyid=7293

Have extra-judicial assassinations ever been wholly legal? Apparently not, or Obama wouldn't have felt a need to supply a fresh legal justification. Have they ever been as transparent and accountable as Obama has made them? If they were, would secret agents need to be secret?



So it looks like what's really new here is not a US president authorizing extra-judicial killing, but this US president trying to remain lawful and accountable instead of just secretly slaughtering people. That being the case, wouldn't it be better to focus objections on the policy, which is long-standing, instead of the guy trying to tell us about it, or would we just rather not know at all?

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Drones: are we shooting the messenger? (Original Post) ucrdem Feb 2013 OP
The Man And The Policy Become Inseparable Once One Becomes President cantbeserious Feb 2013 #1
Since you've used a UK analogy dipsydoodle Feb 2013 #2
Plus one zillion. graham4anything Feb 2013 #3
Thanks g4a. ucrdem Feb 2013 #5
An excellent question. nt bemildred Feb 2013 #4
Thank you. ucrdem Feb 2013 #6
 

graham4anything

(11,464 posts)
3. Plus one zillion.
Sun Feb 10, 2013, 06:57 AM
Feb 2013

As a Hollywood figure is being used,
it is like the alt-media and people's love of The Prisoner (aka Drake from Secret Agent Man)
and the show.

People idolize #6(i am not a number, I am a free man), yet forget he was a super spy cold blooded asssassin just like James Bond and the CIA of George Bush's time.

(and some think anyhow that #6 could actually have been #1 and planted not to give information, but to find information as the final episode might have postulated).

As for President Obama, the same haters hate and find one issue after another.

President Obama, being a consittutional scholar, never does anything without looking ten steps ahead.
And the President is doing the ropethedopes again and will in months to come, make the haters as always, look so transparent.

So, to quote Maxwell Smart, secret agent 86 "Would You believe" I agree with you
one zillion times over.

and people also forget (to paraphrase the old Christmas letter to the editor)" yes Virginia, there are bad guys in the world".

Would those same people rather the President get congressional approval and start a ground war in 5 new countries? And have 100s of thousands of dead?

ucrdem

(15,512 posts)
5. Thanks g4a.
Sun Feb 10, 2013, 10:06 AM
Feb 2013

Yep the usual suspects have once again managed to turn an asset into a liability, with the media piling on and missing the point by miles as usual. Well at least a few of us are catching on.

p.s. happy Mardis Gras!

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Drones: are we shooting t...