2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumDebunking Romney’s Claim That It’s Obama’s War On Women (CHARTS)
http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2012/04/debunking-romneys-claim-that-its-obamas-war-on-women-charts.php?ref=fpnewsfeedDebunking Romneys Claim That Its Obamas War On Women (CHARTS)
Brian Beutler April 11, 2012, 3:10 PM
Mitt Romneys having a terrible time turning the tables on Democrats. But his camps claim that President Obama is the one waging the real war on women is best debunked visually.
With thanks to economist Justin Wolfers for the idea, the below graphs compare male and female employment metrics. The former, charting percent change in total monthly payrolls, shows what economists have known for quite some time. Male-dominated industries took a hard, early hit during the recession. As those industries rebound, more jobs are going to men than to women. Conversely, women lost a huge number of jobs in states and municipalities as a result of teacher layoffs a hemorrhaging that could have been stanched by Obama-proposed legislation to spur teacher hiring, which the GOP blocked.
At a White House briefing on women and the economy last week, a senior administration official grappled with this issue.
Nevertheless, male employment and female employment have nearly returned to the levels they were at when Obama took office. And if Obama is waging a war on women, hes doing a poor job of it. Despite these setbacks, female labor force participation remains near its historic high.
Angry Dragon
(36,693 posts)1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)that the gop "brain trust(s)" sit in a black light lit basement, listening to Pink Floyd, smoking some really good weed, as they conduct talking point strategy meetings. I can just hear them, giggling as they ask, then discount, whether their faithful will even question the validity of the talking point.
(Hey, I really do like PF and used to REALLY like the weed; I only mentioning them for their psychedelic effect ... that and I recall making some REALLY bad decisions after combining the two.)
Proud Liberal Dem
(24,437 posts)This idiotic claim falls under the mildest of critical thinking IMHO.
babylonsister
(171,091 posts)believe anything negative they're told about the President.
Proud Liberal Dem
(24,437 posts)*sigh*
mathematic
(1,440 posts)and how the recession and recovery has been different for men and women. When I heard this latest romney stat my first thought was "that's got to be some horrible abuse of statistics".
That first graph really does a great job of telling the story. Romney's reasoning is so whack that after next month's report (where I expect continued small improvements for both men and women) men will have gained jobs during the obama administration while women will still be slightly below and Romney could claim that women had all the job losses during the obama administration! Obviously an absurd characterization.
Here's where things get ha-ha funny. In a few months both men AND women will have recovered all the jobs lost since the beginning of the obama administration. The romney campaign is basically conceding that this is an appropriate way of looking at the recovery. So when obama comes back in the summer and says "we created more jobs for both men and women" what's romney going to say? "It doesn't count now"? Actually that'd be pretty typical romney.