2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumStatement by President Obama on Republican Filibuster of Caitlin Halligan
The White House
Office of the Press Secretary
For Immediate Release
March 06, 2013
Statement by the President on Republican Filibuster of Caitlin Halligan
I am deeply disappointed that despite support from a majority of the United States Senate, a minority of Senators continues to block the nomination of Caitlin Halligan to serve on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Nearly two and a half years after being nominated, Ms. Halligan continues to wait for a simple up-or-down vote. In the past, filibusters of judicial nominations required extraordinary circumstances, and a Republican Senator who was part of this agreement articulated that only an ethics or qualification issue not ideology would qualify. Ms. Halligan has always practiced law with the highest ethical ideals, and her qualifications are beyond question. Furthermore, her career in public service and as a law enforcement lawyer, serving the citizens of New York, is well within the mainstream.
Todays vote continues the Republican pattern of obstruction. My judicial nominees wait more than three times as long on the Senate floor to receive a vote than my predecessors nominees. The effects of this obstruction take the heaviest toll on the D.C. Circuit, considered the Nations second-highest court, which now has only seven active judges and four vacancies. Until last month, for more than forty years, the court has always had at least eight active judges and as many as twelve. A majority of the Senate agrees that Ms. Halligan is exactly the kind of person who should serve on this court, and I urge Senate Republicans to allow the Senate to express its will and to confirm Ms. Halligan without further delay.
http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2013/03/06/statement-president-republican-filibuster-caitlin-halligan
Firebrand Gary
(5,044 posts)Blocking Halligan's appointment to the D.C. Circuit is nothing more than pure politics. Keeping the D.C. circuit weighted in Republican appointments is their modus operandi. If anyone is under any illusion that the Supreme Court is going to be different than the D.C. Circuit, they ought to think differently.
alcibiades_mystery
(36,437 posts)Rand Paul is a cover operation. Brennan will be confirmed. Sorry, friends and Code Pink. Nobody really gives a shit about Brennan. The real issue is judicial nominees. the R's continue their obstruction, and there's no real movement in the Dem caucus for filibuster reform. Durbin brings it up again. What to do?
Deploy a "bi-partisan" filibuster in the old style, so that any attempt to reform the filibuster will look like it is aimed at that, rather than at what's really at stake: the continuing refusal of perfectly qualified judicial nominees. Trust the so-called progressives to fall for it hook, line, and sinker. Then, after Brennan is confirmed anyway, they'lll never remember. When was the last time a progressive complained about far left judicial nominees being filibustered? Oh yeah: never. So easily manipulated.
JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)Cha
(297,312 posts)Last edited Thu Mar 7, 2013, 03:33 AM - Edit history (1)
about this!?
Tx4obama
(36,974 posts)... the floor again in the future.
Roll call here: http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=113&session=1&vote=00030#position
Cha
(297,312 posts)alive, Tx!
Firebrand Gary
(5,044 posts)That Reid can muster the votes needed. Looking at the vote tally, there should be enough to get her through. If not, then DSCC will have one hell of argument against any incumbent Republican Senator and definitely any Democratic challenger in 2014.
On a side note, this is where I am baffled by the GOP... Not allowing Halligan's nomination to proceed is just plain foolish. They are going to get hammered for this in the next 3 Senatorial election cycles.
While I am genuinely surprised and disappointed, if she does not eventually get confirmed, we are going to rail against them for 6 years for it.
davidpdx
(22,000 posts)I wonder if that was intentional or related to the storm.
I guess even if the 4 Ds had voted yes, they still would have been stuck at 56.
Regarding Senator Lautenberg (D-NJ) he is listed as not voting on March 4th, March 5th, March 6th, and March 7th - maybe he is out sick with the flu or something.
Regarding Sen Lisa Murkowski - This is the first time I've ever seen her be the 'only' republican voting with the Dems - usually anytime that Murkowski votes yes Susan Collins usually does also but not this time.
I haven't a clue about the others - could be they are sick or missed the voted due to other problems.
treestar
(82,383 posts)november3rd
(1,113 posts)Until you put some teeth behind the rhetoric, they're going to keep stepping on your face, Mr. Prez.
Stuart G
(38,434 posts)Here is how I feel about Harry The Liar...an example of proof and an opinion:
proof:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/101794872
opinion:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022270043