Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

niyad

(113,315 posts)
Mon Jun 17, 2013, 12:31 AM Jun 2013

trent franks, abortion bans, and the fetal pain lie


Trent Franks, Abortion Bans, and the Fetal Pain Lie
by Jodi Jacobson

Wednesday, an all-male panel of House Judiciary Committee members, led by Rep. Trent Franks (R-GA), passed a 20-week abortion ban. The bill, HR 1797, passed out of the Judiciary Committee by a vote of 20 to 12. The vote count fell along party lines, with the exception of Congressman Pedro Pierluisi (D-PR), the only Democrat who voted in favor.Trent Franks' federal 20-week abortion ban is a dangerous piece of legislation, based on false and completely disproven assertions about "evidence" of fetal pain. Yet many media outlets are assisting in the perpetuation of lies.
House Speaker John Boehner (R-OH) has promised a floor vote on the bill next week.
This is a dangerous piece of legislation. It is based on false and completely disproven assertions about “evidence” of fetal pain; it makes legislators, rather than doctors, the arbiters of gestational age; and it would result in the trial and imprisonment of medical professionals who provide safe abortion care. Yet in what can only be called an irresponsible quest for what they call “balance,” many media outlets are assisting in the perpetuation of lies about a critical aspect of reproductive health care in support of policies that will deeply harm women and criminalize providers.

As currently written, Franks’ bill would create an absolute ban on abortions in the United States after 20 weeks post-fertilization, for any reason, under any circumstance, except the imminent risk of death of the pregnant person, which as the cases of Beatriz and Savita Halappanavar have shown is not exactly reassuring. Contrary to misreporting by the Washington Post and the Associated Press, it is not a “reaction” to the trial of Kermit Gosnell, but simply the newest iteration of a bill Franks has been pushing for years—and he is using the Gosnell case as an excuse to expand the bill from a focus “only” on the District of Columbia to a nationwide ban.

It is no secret that the GOP is out to ban all abortions in the United States, no matter the costs to women’s lives and health, nor the costs to families and society writ large. When they are not acting to ban abortions outright, legislatures controlled by the GOP and Tea Party are passing unnecessary and costly regulations intended to close clinics run by legitimate providers of safe abortion care, and creating hoops through which patients must jump to get safe abortion care intended to raise the costs of early abortion and to humiliate and shame women, plain and simple.
The GOP and anti-choice movement’s claims about “caring for women” are belied by the fact that passage of a bill that would create blanket restrictions on safe abortion care, would remove health-care decisions from the hands of doctors and the women who are their patients—and would guarantee that criminal actors such as Kermit Gosnell get plenty of business.

. . .
http://www.commondreams.org/view/2013/06/13-8
9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
trent franks, abortion bans, and the fetal pain lie (Original Post) niyad Jun 2013 OP
That guy is as dumb as a post. longship Jun 2013 #1
the woman-hatred becomes more obvious every single day niyad Jun 2013 #2
. . . niyad Jun 2013 #3
"fetal pain" vs. the pain of being unwanted, under-educated, under-fed, and denied healthcare Myrina Jun 2013 #4
you are trying to confuse them with facts and logic. niyad Jun 2013 #5
. . . niyad Jun 2013 #6
. . . . niyad Jun 2013 #7
up to recently they didn't even use anesthesia on infant surgeries.... Sunlei Jun 2013 #8
. . . niyad Jun 2013 #9

longship

(40,416 posts)
1. That guy is as dumb as a post.
Mon Jun 17, 2013, 12:39 AM
Jun 2013

Where does the GOP find these nut cases?

I know. The nearest fundamentalist Christian mega church.

The GOP is so transparently obvious. Theres is as much a religious agenda as a political one.

Myrina

(12,296 posts)
4. "fetal pain" vs. the pain of being unwanted, under-educated, under-fed, and denied healthcare
Mon Jun 17, 2013, 10:55 AM
Jun 2013

.... once you ARE born, in most of these cases.

Seems like a nonstarter to me, Mr. TeaBag.

Sunlei

(22,651 posts)
8. up to recently they didn't even use anesthesia on infant surgeries....
Wed Jun 19, 2013, 11:23 AM
Jun 2013

Still don't on many 'painful' procedures, including birth.

so Mr. political/ fetal development expert....exactly when does a fetus develop neural connections?

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»trent franks, abortion ba...