2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumMitt Romney’s Tough Sell: Blaming a Worsening Economy on Obama
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2012/04/22/mitt-romney-s-tough-sell-blaming-a-worsening-economy-on-obama.htmlMitt Romneys Tough Sell: Blaming a Worsening Economy on Obama
by Michael Tomasky Apr 22, 2012 10:00 AM EDT
Some polls have Obama and Romney running neck-and-neck. But the truth is that Mitt can only win if the economy tanks, says Michael Tomasky.
snip//
Obama leads Romney on almost everything. In many categories he just slaughters him. Easygoing and likeable, 54 to 18. Is compassionate, 52 to 23. Middle-class looker-outer, 48 to 27. Even good commander in chief, 43 to 33 (I guess they havent seen the clips of Obama apologizing for Amerioh, right those clips dont actually exist!). Of 13 questions, Romney leads Obama on exactly two. He leads on changing business as usual in Washington, but any challenger is going to lead an incumbent on that, because the sitting president by definition embodies business as usual in Washington. So that one, as they say at the racetrack, you can toss.
That leaves us with one meaningful category on which Romney leadshaving good ideas for how to improve the economy, by 40 to 34 percent. All of this tells us, I think, a lot about how this campaign might play out. Three points:
2. Romney, therefore, will (if hes smart, that is) try to avoid every topic that is not the economy. As the weeks go on in this race, every week in which the debate is chiefly about women or immigration or Afghanistan or whatever will be a week that Obama wins. It doesnt even really matter if Romney holds his own on the particulars. These are loser topics for him and the GOP.
3. Obama will (if hes smart) try to put these subjects at the center of the debate. He cant exactly avoid talking about the economy. Its a pretty dominant subject. And in fact, there are many points on which he can attack Romney on economics (Medicare, his royalist tax plan, etc.). But Obama will probably try to talk a lot about women and immigration and Osama. In addition, hell do things that emphasize likeability and so forth, and that highlight Romneys detachment and insulation from the normal vagaries and vicissitudes of daily life. The Obama campaign should try to create situations that will bait Romney into doing more things like mentioning his wifes dressage horses or insulting the cookies served to him by a middle-class family purchased from the neighborhoods most beloved bakery.
Romney needs a fundamentals election. In fact, he needs the most fundamentals-ist election of all time. He needs the voting public to conclude, we dont really like this guy, in fact we pretty well dislike him; but we need him. A tough sell.
no_hypocrisy
(46,122 posts)Obama will turn the origin of "the worsening economy" back on Jeb's brother and his administration. And Romney knows that.
Arneoker
(375 posts)is that it was all Bush's fault, and that he cannot take responsibility for what happened on his watch. What Obama needs to do is make it a matter of what policies are followed, and point out that Romney is advocating the same policies followed when things got so bad in the first place, and ask why would we go from an improving (if still unsatisfactory) situation to an experiment to see if we tried those previous policies, then maybe this time they would work!
DCBob
(24,689 posts)the President will be reelected. The Republicans know this and they also know the economy is likely not to reverse direction between now and Nov. They gave it their best shot by blocking virtually every jobs initiative the Dems and Obama put forward but they failed.
Liberal_Stalwart71
(20,450 posts)90-percent
(6,829 posts)"Some people get so rich, they lose all respect for humanity. That's how rich I want to get." Rita Rudner
I didn't vet this. I hope it's bona fide. It does summarize Romney's entire existence on this planet, don't it?
-90% Jimmy
mvd
(65,174 posts)And how a guns over butter approach repeatedly has led to a weaker middle class and weaker everything except the 1%.
high density
(13,397 posts)Obama could have some brilliant idea that fixes the world but Congress would not implement it because they do not want the economy to improve.
And then am I supposed to believe that Mitt Romney has an economic idea that we haven't tried yet? We already saw the GOP implement all of their greatest hits under George W. Bush and we know how well that worked out. They did good that it's now being blamed on Obama.