2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forum14 Republican Lawmakers who got $7.2 million in farm subsidies voted to cut food stamps.
Fourteen GOP lawmakers have received a total of $7.2 million in farm subsidies, according to the available data since 2004, but all voted for an amendment that would have decreased the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program according to a report Rep. George Miller (D-Calif.) is releasing Monday
Rep. Stephen Fincher (R-Tenn.) has received a total of $3.5 million in farm subsidies, according to numbers tracked by the lobbying firm Environmental Working Group. The company points out that according to his congressional filings, his net worth is between $204,995 and $1.1 million. And 22 percent of the residents of Finchers home county receive food stamps.
snip
Only one of the 14 members listed in the report, Rep. Marlin Stutzman (R-Ind.), voted against the bill when it included SNAP benefits but for it once SNAP was removed.
snip
Rep. Doug LaMalfa (R-Calif.) received $1.7 million in farm subsidies and resides in a county in which 11 percent of the population receives SNAP benefits.
Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2013/07/republicans-who-got-farm-subsidies-targeted-94532.html#ixzz2ZmOa0vn3
*********
Bottom line "they" have no shame ..... overtime pay no way, sticking their noses into women's
health care matters, and now taking away food stamps but taking Fed $s for their farms.
This is not the party of Dwight Eisenhower or Abe Lincoln.
Atman
(31,464 posts)Botany
(70,508 posts)Botany =
Coyotl
(15,262 posts)10 percent of farmers collected 74 percent of all subsidies, amounting to nearly $166 billion over 16 years
62 percent of U.S. farmers did not collect subsidy payments
The bottom 80 percent of recipients averaged just $587 a year
Now, if you look at the leading recipients of commodity subsidies, you'll see the highest earners received payments numbering in the hundreds of millions from 1995-2010 for the top three!
Lasher
(27,597 posts)If that is the case, then it would be corrupt for them to have participated in those votes at all.
bemildred
(90,061 posts)66 dmhlt
(1,941 posts)But the problem is that even if you know the person who owns the farm, quite frequently the farm is given some corporate name - and it's hard to find any facts.
Like Michele Bachmann's farm is listed under her deceased father-in-law's name:
http://www.rippleinstillwater.com/2011/01/michele-bachmanns-family-farm-operating.html