Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DonViejo

(60,536 posts)
Thu Oct 17, 2013, 06:45 AM Oct 2013

The Myth of the Medical-Device Tax

OP-ED CONTRIBUTOR

The Myth of the Medical-Device Tax

By TOPHER SPIRO

Published: October 16, 2013


WASHINGTON — IN the last few days of negotiations in Congress, repeal of the Affordable Care Act’s tax on medical devices emerged as a key Republican demand. The medical-device industry waged an intense lobbying campaign — even garnering the support of many Democrats who favored the law — arguing that the tax would stifle innovation and increase health care costs.

This argument is doubly disingenuous. Not only can the medical-device industry easily afford the tax without compromising innovation, but the industry’s enormous profits are a result of anticompetitive practices that themselves drive up medical-device costs unnecessarily. The tax is a distraction from reforms to the industry that are urgently needed to lower health care costs.

The medical-device industry faces virtually no price competition. Because of confidentiality agreements that manufacturers require hospitals to sign, the prices of the devices are cloaked in secrecy. This lack of transparency impedes hospitals from sharing price information and thus knowing whether they are getting a good deal.

Even worse, manufacturers often maintain personal relationships (sometimes involving financial payments like consulting fees) with physicians who choose the medical devices that their hospitals purchase, creating a conflict of interest. Physicians often don’t even know the costs of the devices, and individual physicians often choose devices on their own, which weakens a hospital’s ability to bargain for volume discounts.

full article
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/10/17/opinion/the-myth-of-the-medical-device-tax.html?partner=rss&emc=rss

1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Myth of the Medical-Device Tax (Original Post) DonViejo Oct 2013 OP
Pharma and Medical Device Industries... Jeff In Milwaukee Oct 2013 #1

Jeff In Milwaukee

(13,992 posts)
1. Pharma and Medical Device Industries...
Thu Oct 17, 2013, 07:11 AM
Oct 2013

Are quite possibly the most subsidized in the country, with the possible exception of the oil industry.

Taxpayers support dozens of major research facilities and conduct the basic research that underpins their product, and the fruits of this research is generally available free of charge. When when it gets down to clinical trials of new drugs and devices, these are also heavily underwritten by the government.

The idea that these industries are even responsible for "innovation" in their field is ludicrous in itself. And the idea that they can't afford to pay back some of their massive subsidies in the form of a tax on their profits is galling.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»The Myth of the Medical-D...