2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumTexas figures out how to disenfranchise female voters.
If you can't win their votes, erase their votes!
http://thenewcivilrightsmovement.com/texas-republicans-find-a-way-to-disenfranchise-women-voters/news/2013/10/17/77023#.UmHykxbvzlQ
Theyve targeted Blacks, Latinos and college students. Now Texas has come up with a Voter ID law that will disproportionately affect women the constituency they most fear will support Wendy Davis.
Women are Wendy Davis natural base. Her eleven-hour filibuster of an abortion bill that closed family planning clinics in Texas is the reason she has the name recognition and the political capital to make a run for governor. Anti-choice groups who have never before had to spend money opposing a pro-choice candidate are scrambling to form political action groups to run ads against her. Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott, the man who is most likely to be her opponent, has been touting himself as the real pro-woman candidate for his success at collecting back child support from deadbeat dads. Now, Republicans have found what they hope will be a more reliable plan than trying to persuade women that Republicans have their best interest at heart:
Dont let women vote.
Think Progress reports that as of November 5, Texans must show a photo ID with their up-to-date legal name. It sounds like such a small thing, but according to the Brennan Center for Justice, only 66% of voting age women have ready access to a photo document that will attest to proof of citizenship. This is largely because young women have not updated their documents with their married names, a circumstance that doesnt affect male voters in any significant way. Suddenly 34% of women voters are scrambling for an acceptable ID, while 99% of men are home free.
As of November 5, a birth certificate is not enough. Women voters will have to show legal proof of a name change: a marriage license, a divorce decree, or court ordered change; and they have to be the original documents. No photocopies allowed. This means thousands of women face the hassle of figuring out what they need and how to get it. Then they face at least a $20 fee, more if a woman doesnt have the time to stand in line and wants it mailed. As a result, many women who are eligible to vote, wont.
TDale313
(7,820 posts)The voter suppression efforts just make me absolutely sick.
johnnyrocket
(1,773 posts)they don't want the people doing the picking....oh no, that would be, shutter, democratic.
IrishAyes
(6,151 posts)libdem4life
(13,877 posts)not idiots. If they want to vote, FFS, they can figure out how to get and show an goshdarned ID. Please...again, stop with the victim female-good male-bad programmed shit.
SharonAnn
(13,776 posts)They have little time to get these documents, once they figure out what they need, and little money to pay for the forms, original copies, etc. And then little time to get it all together and go visit the appropriate office (during office hours) to get it all approved.
Many of us don't really understand how limited time is, especially during office hours, for people who are in jobs where they can't just "take time off" for these types of things. Oh, and they often can't even make phone calls while they're "on the clock" to find out the information they need.
Since "Voter Fraud" is almost non-existent, these requirements aren't trying to solve that problem. They have another purpose which is to disenfranchise targeted groups of people.
libdem4life
(13,877 posts)knowing about that first hand, it does not preclude getting important things done during working hours. There are lunch hours...I spent those getting business done. Few places don't have pay phones and it is law to provide lunch and breaks. I got my out-of-state birth certificate in the mail. If you had a marriage or divorce and lost the paperwork, it's a trip to the County Recorder's office and I'm pretty sure anyone can get those for you...unfortunately...unless they are sealed. If you're a naturalized citizen, your papers are precious. It's not like you have to do it every year. And this category includes men, as well.
Everything is a hassle...doctor's appointments, children's emergencies or illness, personal emergencies...when you're poor or language-challenged or overworked, agreed. But most Health and Human Services offices have someone to help, often in various languages.
I'd prefer to just say that everyone living and/or working in the US should have a driver's license or a state photo ID, especially women. It's hard to get to a poll if you don't drive. You can't get a bank account, a check cashed or take money out of the bank without it.
If nothing else these laws will empower women (and men) to help take charge of their lives, unless they are here illegally in which case voting disenfranchisement is not the issue, and that's another subject.
csziggy
(34,136 posts)They should keep the name they were born with. When I married in 1977 it was an uphill battle to NOT change my name - I had hassles with the IRS and the Social Security Administration. Both agencies assumed that I had taken my husband's name. It took four years before they finally quit making that assumption.
Now I am very, very glad I went through that.
On one level I am kidding. On another, I would recommend that no young woman change her name, ever. KEEP YOUR NAME!