Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

flpoljunkie

(26,184 posts)
Mon Oct 21, 2013, 02:06 PM Oct 2013

Peter Beinart: Republicans Don’t Really Care About Reducing America’s Debt

Republicans Don’t Really Care About Reducing America’s Debt
by Peter Beinart

Oct 21, 2013

They love deficit reduction in the abstract—they even risked a second financial crisis over the debt ceiling. But over the next two months, watch them avoid making tough debt choices to avert another shutdown, says Peter Beinart.

The press has spent the last few days tallying the reasons Congress probably won’t forge the big budget deal necessary to spare the country future brinkmanship of the kind we endured last week. The reasons are familiar: John Boehner is still weak. President Obama still won’t fold. Ted Cruz still exists.

But there’s another reason, which gets less attention. Most Republicans aren’t really interested in reducing America’s debt. I know that sounds strange. After all, conservatives have spent the Obama era screaming that unless America reduces its debt, we’ll become Greece or Detroit or ancient Rome. Last week, some congressional Republicans found the prospect of raising the debt limit so horrifying that they were willing to risk a second financial crisis instead.

But ignore the rhetoric and watch what the GOP does between now and December. Last week, as part of the deal to reopen the government and raise the debt ceiling, Congress gave budget negotiators roughly two months to agree on a deficit-reduction deal. Basically, the negotiators have three options. First is to replace the “sequester”—the automatic cuts to discretionary spending that kicked in last March—with cuts to long-term “entitlement” programs such as Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security. Second is to replace the sequester with both entitlement cuts and tax hikes. Third is to do nothing and let the sequester continue.


more...

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2013/10/21/republicans-don-t-really-care-about-reducing-america-s-debt.html
7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Peter Beinart: Republicans Don’t Really Care About Reducing America’s Debt (Original Post) flpoljunkie Oct 2013 OP
Kind of a "Well, d'uh!" article, but interesting.... Wounded Bear Oct 2013 #1
LOL! You're correct. And I have lost a ton of respect for... DonViejo Oct 2013 #3
Kudos to anyone writing column titled 'Republicans Don’t Really Care About Reducing America’s Debt' flpoljunkie Oct 2013 #4
True, but it needs to be repeated, repeated, repeated... JHB Oct 2013 #6
They ran the damned thing up in the first place BeyondGeography Oct 2013 #2
Fourth option includes raising taxes and lifting the SS cap. Just sayin'. SharonAnn Oct 2013 #5
It seems a given that SS and Med HAVE to be cut Proud Liberal Dem Oct 2013 #7

DonViejo

(60,536 posts)
3. LOL! You're correct. And I have lost a ton of respect for...
Mon Oct 21, 2013, 02:26 PM
Oct 2013

the author, Peter Beinart. Well, actually, my respect level for him was kind of low any way. Beinart is one of the Dems that advocated for the overthrow of Saddam and then took a long while to see the light. Further, just last week, Beinart was authoring columns urging the President to cave to the House GOP and Carnival Cruz.

flpoljunkie

(26,184 posts)
4. Kudos to anyone writing column titled 'Republicans Don’t Really Care About Reducing America’s Debt'
Mon Oct 21, 2013, 03:19 PM
Oct 2013

I don't agree with everything he writes, either, but pleased he wrote this.

JHB

(37,162 posts)
6. True, but it needs to be repeated, repeated, repeated...
Mon Oct 21, 2013, 05:31 PM
Oct 2013

...in public to have a chance of getting absorbed by the "I'm not really into politics" people.

BeyondGeography

(39,382 posts)
2. They ran the damned thing up in the first place
Mon Oct 21, 2013, 02:21 PM
Oct 2013

Which Beinert doesn't even mention. They don't want smaller government; they want to screw poor people and they want ineffective/less regulation and the ability to self-deal in the Halliburton manner with impunity.

They have zero integrity, Peter. Stop pretending.

SharonAnn

(13,779 posts)
5. Fourth option includes raising taxes and lifting the SS cap. Just sayin'.
Mon Oct 21, 2013, 05:23 PM
Oct 2013

His three options include only cuts that include SS and Medicare or the sequester.

Proud Liberal Dem

(24,438 posts)
7. It seems a given that SS and Med HAVE to be cut
Tue Oct 22, 2013, 01:58 PM
Oct 2013

My question is, why? I can see maybe updating it in some ways to keep it current and with the times but given the lousy economy and other cuts to the social safety net, cutting SS and Medicare doesn't make a lot is sense to me.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Peter Beinart: Republica...