2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumPolls: Shutdown Puts 48 Republican House Incumbents Behind Generic Democratic Opponent
Polls: Shutdown Puts 48 Republican House Incumbents Behind Generic Democratic Opponent
-snip-
-snip-
This third round of polling shows even more Republican incumbents in danger:
Incumbent Republicans trail generic Democrats in 15 of the 25 districts we most recently surveyed. This means generic Democrats lead in 37 of 61 districts polled since the beginning of the government shutdown. Democrats only need to net 17 seats in order to retake the House.
And the bad news for Republicans doesnt stop there, because in the minority of the 61 districts where Republicans lead in the initial head-to-head question, 11 more Republicans fall behind once voters are informed that the Republican supported the government shutdown and 1 race becomes tied. This means that our results indicate Democrats have pickup opportunities in an astounding 49 of the 61 districts surveyed.
Of course, important caveats apply. The 2014 elections are more than a year away, and these surveys were conducted in the midst of a high-profile shutdown debate. Moreover, generic Democratic candidates are not the same as actual candidates. Democrats must recruit strong candidates and run effective campaigns in individual districts if they are to capitalize on the vulnerability revealed by these surveys, and they must maintain a significant national advantage over Republicans.
Its entirely up to Republicans if they want to ignore the push-poll question (they shouldnt, though, because people really, really do blame them for the shutdown), but even without that, 37 seats is more than enough to give Democrats the House in 2014. Answering a telephone survey isnt the same as actually voting in a non-presidential election, though, which is the lone scrap of security blankie that Republicans can hold to their cheeks. Gerrymandering and low midterm turnout remain their allies.
What this poll does do, however, is ensure that Democratic donors will pour money and resources into these races that they otherwise might not have. Can Democrats figure out a way to translate 48 leads and three near-ties into 17 wins? Stay tuned.
Full article here: http://www.mediaite.com/online/polls-shutdown-puts-48-republican-house-incumbents-behind-generic-democratic-opponent/
Benton D Struckcheon
(2,347 posts)Ha! I need to post this to his (Scott Garrett's) Facebook page...
ChangeUp106
(549 posts)Let them keep doing what they do
loveandlight
(207 posts)I love to see him go. Maybe my state can get a little bit cleaned up. Gonna be a lot more interesting election this time around.
Laelth
(32,017 posts)-Laelth
libdem4life
(13,877 posts)Hutzpa
(11,461 posts)Coyotl
(15,262 posts)DallasNE
(7,403 posts)Democrats have been successful in recruiting strong Democrats to run in 2 of 3 House races in Nebraska. One of those has a decent shot at replacing an incumbent Republican. But even in the other district Republicans will need to spend money to defend the seat, leaving less money for other races, i.e., they will be defending their own turf rather than pouring that money in races with Democratic incumbents and that matters. When that happens elsewhere it means there could be higher than expected Democratic turnout with consequences statewide in competitive Governors rand Senate races.