2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumTea Party is an anti-populist elite tool. And it has progressives fooled
This is not some spontaneous uprising. It's the newest incarnation of a rich, elite, right-wing tradition
BY MICHAEL LIND
In recent essays for Salon I have argued that progressives and mainstream pundits are making a profound mistake by treating Tea Party radicalism as an outburst of irrationality by moronic low information yokels, rather than understanding it as a calculated (if not necessarily successful) strategy by the regional elite of the South and its allies in other regions. In an Op-Ed for the Wall Street Journal titled The Tea Party and the GOP Crackup, William Galston presents data that reinforces this conclusion:
Many frustrated liberals, and not a few pundits, think that people who share these beliefs must be downscale and poorly educated. The New York Times survey found the opposite. Only 26% of tea-party supporters regard themselves as working class, versus 34% of the general population; 50% identify as middle class (versus 40% nationally); and 15% consider themselves upper-middle class (versus 10% nationally). Twenty-three percent are college graduates, and an additional 14% have postgraduate training, versus 15% and 10%, respectively, for the overall population. Conversely, only 29% of tea-party supporters have just a high-school education or less, versus 47% for all adults.
I have also argued that the Tea Party is not a new movement that sprang up as a result of spontaneous populist anger against Wall Street bailouts in the Great Recession, but rather the newest right, the most recent incarnation of an evolving right-wing tradition that goes back beyond Reagan and Goldwater to mostly Southern roots. Galston notes the high degree of overlap between the Tea Party and mainstream Republican conservatives:
Nor, finally, is the tea party an independent outside force putting pressure on Republicans, according to the survey. Fully 76% of its supporters either identify with or lean toward the Republican Party. Rather, they are a dissident reform movement within the party, determined to move it back toward true conservatism after what they see as the apostasies of the Bush years and the outrages of the Obama administration.
more
http://www.salon.com/2013/10/22/tea_party_is_an_anti_populist_elite_tool_and_it_has_progressives_fooled/
JaneQPublic
(7,113 posts)...of the American Revolution.
Always Randy
(1,059 posts)you are right -----these people ---particularly their financiers need to be put up on center stage------maybe Mother Jones could get some video on these RW's
Blue_Tires
(55,445 posts)Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)Same old radical right wing racists and bigots.
beltanefauve
(1,784 posts)Teabagger Republicans are exactly that: Republicans. Ask any of these people who they voted for during the last six election cycles and you will get Republicans, Republicans,Republicans every time. Same for so-called Libertarians. Better to attach the word Republican to Teabagger, IMO.
YoungDemCA
(5,714 posts)And they have driven a lot (though not all) of so-called "moderate" Republicans into the arms of the Democratic Party.
UCmeNdc
(9,600 posts)That is why they vote and identify with the GOP. If they were truly anti GOP they would support a party outside of the GOP to represent their views. A portion of the Republican Party represents their views so these Tea Party people vote for those Republican politicians.
frylock
(34,825 posts)are these people like the self-identified liberals that embrace right-wing policy if it comes from a democrat? moreover, you can collect as many diplomas and degrees as you like, but if you still unquestioningly accept Fox as a legitimate news source, then you're still a moronic low information yokel. they may be fooling the centrists and moderates on the left, but progressives have had these idiots pegged from jump.
YoungDemCA
(5,714 posts)It's that they're BAD information voters.
There's a difference, and the latter is worse, IMHO. It's the difference between ignorance and delusion.
Proud Liberal Dem
(24,414 posts)What did they ever get upset at the Bush (mis-)Administration about? For all of their complaints about Wall Street bailouts, TARP, etc., they have been mighty resistant to any sort of meaningful reforms and/or increasing regulations on Wall Street following the 2008 meltdown. Many of them blame left-wing groups and government-run entities for the meltdown. Most of them- or at least a lot of them- were its most ardent defenders about just about everything- torture, Iraq, illegal (at the time) wiretapping, tax cuts, deregulation. You name it. None of them AFAIK were upset about the massive tax cuts for the wealthy or the massive deregulation or the vast sums of money or lives spent in Iraq over phantom WMDs not to mention the money and equipment that was stolen and/or went missing (or both). The only people raising objections to the Bush (mis-)Administration were progressives and Democrats though we were mostly shut out in the cold from any serious discussions of what it was up to. The Tea Party movement is/was IMHO a right-wing reaction against President Obama's election disguised as a populist movement supported and funded by rich right-wingers to cripple and obstruct his (and the Democrats') agenda and boost the Republican Party after it was left flagging after the 2008 election and the failures of the Bush (mis-)Administration.
YoungDemCA
(5,714 posts)nt
YoungDemCA
(5,714 posts)Who dominate the party everywhere.