Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumRight-wing garbage debunked: No, regulation doesn’t kill jobs
The right loves to warn that regulations will harm "job creators." A new report explains why that's nonsenseSEAN MCELWEE
Its one of the oldest right-wing claims: Excessive regulation will harm job creators and kill the economy. But is it based on sound economics?
One new study, which examines this particular argument, finds it absurd on its face. Taylor Lincoln, who authored the report for Public Citizen, tells Salon the goal was to point out hypocrisy and contradictions and the chasms between rhetoric and reality. To that end, the report cites one Heritage Foundation study which asserted that a more efficient regulatory system could create 9.6 million jobs. The problem, as Washington Post columnist Steven Pearlstein noted: there are only 7 million unemployed Americans.
Heritage isnt the only one making this argument. A Phoenix Foundation study claimed that, a 5 percent reduction in the federal regulatory budget would yield 5.9 million new jobs over five years. But the Public Citizen report points out that this leads to a ludicrous conclusion: a 16 percent decrease (a figure the authors chose to parallel the amount by which they say federal spending had exceeded revenue since 2000) would result in the creation of 18.8 million new jobs over five years. In contrast, there are only about 11.3 million unemployed Americans.
Dr. Thomas McGarity, a University of Texas professor who has studied regulation for decades, finds the right-wing argument wanting. As to whether cutting regulation could increase economic growth, he tells Salon, its a silly argument. The impact of regulation, particularly in this era when its so darn hard to write a regulation, is nothing compared to what the Fed does each meeting. His most recent book, Freedom to Harm, details how a decade-long assault on regulation threatens workers and the environment.
full article
http://www.salon.com/2013/12/02/right_wing_garbage_debunked_no_regulation_doesnt_kill_jobs/
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 1352 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (4)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Right-wing garbage debunked: No, regulation doesn’t kill jobs (Original Post)
DonViejo
Dec 2013
OP
darkangel218
(13,985 posts)1. Of course its a big, huge lie.
They don't like regulations, so they spew false propaganda, just like with eveything else.
Scuba
(53,475 posts)2. Depends on how one counts "unemployed Americans". For example ...
TreasonousBastard
(43,049 posts)3. I thought everyone knew regulation increases employment...
Regulators are hired, and money is spent complying with the regulations.
Duh!
Proud Liberal Dem
(24,412 posts)4. In a perfect world, regulations would not be necessary
and businesses would do what they need to do to keep their employees and customers safe and healthy because it's the right thing to do. None of us live in that particular world, of course. Right-wingers talk about regulation like a curse- like something that "government" WANTS to do but neglect/overlook the fact that a certain amount of regulation is necessary because at one time businesses were doing all sort of things that were harming their employees and/or customers and had to be forced- by an outside entity- to do what they should have been doing all along.