Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Eugene

(61,963 posts)
Tue Dec 10, 2013, 03:15 PM Dec 2013

Bipartisan negotiators try for modest budget pact

Source: Associated Press

Bipartisan negotiators try for modest budget pact

AP foreign, Tuesday December 10 2013

ANDREW TAYLOR

Associated Press= WASHINGTON (AP) — The lead Democratic negotiator says she is close to a deal with Republicans on a modest budget agreement that's expected to replace tens of billions of dollars in spending cuts this year and next with longer-term savings and revenue from increased fees.

"We're not there yet but we are working out details and I'm hopeful," Sen. Patty Murray said as she entered a meeting where she was expected to brief fellow Democrats on the talks. She said she hopes to announce an agreement by the end of the day.

Murray has been negotiating with House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan, R-Wis.

The two have been holding secretive talks for weeks aimed at producing an accord to replace some, but not all, of the automatic spending cuts known as sequestration. Budget experts and aides briefed on the talks predict that any bargain may replace $65 billion in spending cuts over two years, with half going to the Pentagon and half going to domestic programs. About $45 billion would be devoted to the 2014 fiscal year and about $20 billion to fiscal 2015.

[font size=1]-snip-[/font]


Read more: http://www.theguardian.com/world/feedarticle/11103816
1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Bipartisan negotiators try for modest budget pact (Original Post) Eugene Dec 2013 OP
Even if this is true, there is no certainty that Paul Ryan will not decide against it Mass Dec 2013 #1

Mass

(27,315 posts)
1. Even if this is true, there is no certainty that Paul Ryan will not decide against it
Tue Dec 10, 2013, 03:22 PM
Dec 2013

if he thinks this is to his advantage (he voted AGAINST the deal last time) and that the House leadership will get their caucus behind them, hence no certainty Boehner will call for a vote.

And we know it is a strict minimum with a lot of poisoned pills in it.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Bipartisan negotiators tr...