2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumWhen Conservatives Cry Wolf
Michael Tomasky
The Republican Party claimsonce againthat it's ready for change. But really, all this fanfare seems more like a howl for Washington's attention and a ploy for PR.
There were two important developments in the Republican Party last week. Lets take stock.
First, after years of saying that yes, they would develop and introduce an alternative to Obamacare, three GOP senators finally presented one: Orrin Hatch, Tom Coburn, and Richard Burr unveiled what they call their PCARE plan (yes, its another one of those syrupy, dopey Washington acronyms that have become such a pestilential constant in our city). Conservatives exulted; See? We can be serious about policy! But as Jonathan Chait wrote, the thing was awfully general and sketchy, and as soon as people started asking serious questions about how this or that would work, things began to fall apart. As of now, the plan has evanesced into something that no one really takes seriously and everyone recognizes for what it isa mere talking point, a general outline that exists solely so Republicans can go on teevee and say they have a plan.
The second development occurred several days ago when John Boehner promised big movement on the immigration front. Well do a bill this year, he said. No citizenship, no amnesty, but a process toward legal status. The Republicans were ready to cut a deal. Boehner posted his guidelines for reform on his web site Monday. By Friday, 4,500 comments had been posted, roughly 95 percent (or more!) of them negative (Please tell the Jews that we dont want their One World Order. If they like immigrants send them to Israel[sic], wrote user Barbara Cornett). At the end of the week, Boehner suggested that immigration reform might not, after all, be on the docket this year. (Update: I softened this language from the original, at the suggestion of Greg Sargent, and he's right about Boehner's words, although I remain a hard-shell skeptic.)
Remember when we had a budget deal in December, and the government didnt shut down again, and negotiations didnt go until the eleventh-and-a-half hour? At that point, we actually had some people talking about the dawn of a new day in Washington. Maybe the Republicans really were changing their stripes.
When an alcoholic is destroying a family, its his drinking, self-denial and lies that are creating the problem. But a lot of the time, the family contributes, too. Its in, perhaps, its own state of denial. Oh its not so bad, really. Oh hes under lots of pressure. I think he can stop, I really do. Maybe not just yet. As soon as he gets through this (intense time at work/family illness/etc.).
This is what the larger Washington establishment has become: The enabling spouse of the drunk. Theyll change. I just know it. This time, I really dont see how they cant. I mean, supporting immigration reform is so clearly in their own self-interest! And certainly, it is. But laying off the sauce is certainly in the alcoholics self-interest, too. In that case, we all understand why the alkie doesnt stop. It has nothing to do with self-interest. He knows his own self-interest. But he cant change until his shame and disgust with himself is such that hes ready to try.
more
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2014/02/10/the-gop-that-cries-wolf.html
Proud Liberal Dem
(24,414 posts)When voters- despite all the tried and true reasons not to- give Republicans power in statehouses in a good swath of the country and in the House of Representatives (and may possibly give them control of the US Senate this year) their extremism is basically rewarded and there becomes less incentive and pressure on them to really change anything. After all, if they're still being electorally successful in places, why SHOULD they change anything?