2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumGardner to Oppose Udall, Complicating Democrats’ Senate Hopes
WASHINGTON Representative Cory Gardner, a rising star in the Republican Party, will run for Senate in Colorado, the latest complication to Democrats hopes to hold on to a number of Senate seats that had seemed relatively safe.
Mr. Gardner, 39, will challenge Senator Mark Udall, a Democrat in his first term. His decision to enter the race was an unexpected development, and to the Democrats an unwelcome one. Mr. Udall, 63, had so far attracted only Republican opponents whose campaigns were struggling to gain traction.
One of them, Ken Buck, a district attorney who ran for the Senate but lost in 2010, suddenly dropped his bid after news of Mr. Gardners candidacy, which was first reported by The Denver Post.
We need to replace Mark Udall in the Senate, and I believe Congressman Cory Gardner is in the strongest position to make that happen, said Mr. Buck, who said he would run for Mr. Gardners seat.
With Mr. Buck out of the race and Mr. Gardner already sitting on more than $875,000 he had raised for his House race, the two-term congressman would be a logical front-runner for the June primary. To beat Mr. Udall, who has almost $5 million on hand, will be no simple feat.
more...
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/02/27/us/politics/gardner-to-oppose-udall-complicating-democrats-senate-hopes.html?_r=0
Proud Liberal Dem
(24,422 posts)Is Udall having problems in the polls? Or is the story just concern-trolling?
otohara
(24,135 posts)This is after all a midterm election and D's are notorious for not voting. The whole gun thing has the GOP riled up in CO and weed isn't on the ballot this time. Not that the weed vote was helpful to D's in November - 58,000 voted against POTUS.
Purveyor
(29,876 posts)on our Nov ballot here in Michigan.
Sen. Levin's senate seat is up for grabs and the GOP is running a strong, woman candidate with very good name recognition. Our candidate, not so much. Going to be a tough one imo.
dsteve01
(312 posts)we have nothing to worry about. He's got deep pockets in New Mexico and he's been in congress a while for NM. I can't really see the guy losing.
DavidDvorkin
(19,480 posts)smokey775
(228 posts)This is about Mark Udall D-CO.
FBaggins
(26,753 posts)Gardner wouldn't have given up a safe seat unless there was a reason to believe that he could win.
Polling for Udall was troubling before Gardner got in the race (and two people backed out and endorsed him). Udall was leading by a couple points, but drew only 43-45% (a problem for any incumbent).
The bad news is that the Senate is in real trouble if this race comes into play... but the good news is that this is all caught up in the President's awful polling numbers (ACA, etc). If they start to improve at the right time, the race should move back to comparatively safe.
Hippo_Tron
(25,453 posts)At this point assuming they pick up WV, MT, SD, AR, and LA they've got two paths to a majority through either NC or AK. All of these are Romney states. The fact that they can put Dems on the defensive in Colorado is not good news to what's already shaping up to be an extremely difficult year. If they nominate reasonable people rather than Tea-Nuts in these states (and it looks like they're headed that way in most of them), it's going to be very hard for Dems to hold the Senate.
Sunlei
(22,651 posts)Personally I am sick and tired of paying about $30,000 (over a decade) to a state gov. on a modest house. You never really 'own' your home or property when republicans like Gardner boast about how much "State Revenue" they generate from YOUR property taxes.
A really good issue, a good bill to D politicians to promote to regular local citizens is to stop property tax on primary family homes after people have paid in for 10 or 20 years. And only restart the tax when the property is sold to another. This would directly benefit the middle class and it sure would be nice to have an extra 3k a year to fix-up the old house.