2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumHow States Are Shifting College Costs to Students
Beneath the ever-rising mountain of student debt lies a core question of values and priorities. College degrees benefit both students and society, providing paths to higher personal incomes and broader economic growthbut whos responsible for covering the cost of that investment? A new report shows how in many ways, states have already answered that question. Theyre passing the bill on to families rather than to taxpayers at large.
The Chronicle of Higher Educations report looks at the decades-long erosion of support for higher education. It charts how public colleges were once seen as worthy of collective investment for the greater good but increasingly have been viewed as just benefiting individual students, who ought to foot the bill themselves.
This shift in public attitudes goes hand in hand with declining state support for schools, both reflecting tighter budgets and changing priorities about whats worthy of funding. The Chronicle reports how, for example, a victory for auto dealers in South Carolina imposing a cap on sales taxes cost the state an estimated $169 million last year, which would be sufficient to restore about half of the cuts made to public colleges since 2008.
The report also highlights analysis from the the Pell Institute for the Study of Opportunity in Higher Education that shows if the funding trends since 1980 continue, some states could stop supporting higher ed entirely within the decade. Colorado could be first, reaching $0 in 2022, followed by Alaska two years later. In the 2030s, another nine states could join them, including Virginia, Massachusetts, and Oregon. Heres the Chronicles chart showing the timeline when funding could dry up in different places:
Despite tales of rock climbing walls and bloated administrations, public colleges overall havent changed over the past two decades how much they spend to educate each student. With costs flat, public funding down, and public colleges asking students to fund the shortfall in revenue, the education inequality gap will further widen, the Chronicle argues. That means leaving behind students who would have gone to college, found good jobs, started businesses, paid taxes, and generally helped to drive the economy. An undereducated workforce isnt cheap. States that think theyre saving money by saying higher education is a personal rather than collective investment will wind up paying for the consequences.
http://mobile.businessweek.com/articles/2014-03-03/how-states-are-shifting-college-costs-on-to-students
greymattermom
(5,754 posts)One that I know of is medical schools. If the one where I work became private, it could easily fill the class with out of state students who could afford to pay. How would they find doctors for rural areas then? It's already a big problem. The same goes for all of the Health Professions.
elzenmahn
(904 posts)...one could say this started when Ronniebaby ended free tuition at UC in the late 60s - early 70s.
I used to attend SFSU. I recall that tuition increases back then (the early 90s) were a hot topic, because our dear college President. Dr. Corrigan, wanted to tie fees to costs.
This has to stop. But it will take a shift in culture, which usually is a generational change.