Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

question everything

(47,521 posts)
Fri Mar 7, 2014, 11:59 PM Mar 2014

There's No Need to End Saturday Mail Delivery - Bernie Sanders

And Op-ed in the WSJ

(snip)

The Postal Service is under constant and vicious attack. Why? The answer is simple. There are very powerful and wealthy special interests who want to privatize or dismember virtually every function that government now performs, whether it is Social Security, Medicare, public education or the Postal Service. They see an opportunity for Wall Street and corporate America to make billions in profits out of these services, and couldn't care less how privatization or a degradation of services affects ordinary Americans.

For years, antigovernment forces have been telling us that there is a financial crisis at the Postal Service and that it is going broke. That is not true. The crisis is manufactured. At the insistence of the Bush administration, Congress in 2006 passed legislation that required the Postal Service to prefund, over a 10-year period, 75 years of future retiree health benefits. This onerous and unprecedented burden—$5.5 billion a year—is responsible for all of the financial losses posted by the Postal Service since October 2012. Without prefunding, the Postal Service would have made a $623 million profit last year. Excluding the prefunding mandate, the Postal Service estimates it will make more than $1 billion in profits this year. This is not surprising, since the Postal Service made a combined profit of $9 billion from 2003-06, before the prefunding mandate took effect.

(snip)

In the House, Rep. Darrell Issa (R., Calif.) passed a bill through his committee that would do all of these things. The bill would drive more customers to seek other options and will lead to a death spiral—lower-quality service, fewer customers, more cuts, less revenue and eventually the destruction of the Postal Service. In the Senate, Sens. Tom Carper (D., Del.) and Tom Coburn (R., Okla.) also passed a postal reform bill through the Homeland Security and Government Affairs Committee. While not as destructive as the House proposal, the Carper-Coburn bill could lead to the loss of about 100,000 jobs, allow the Postal Service to eliminate six-day mail delivery, substantially slow down the delivery of mail, and lead to the loss of more mail processing plants and post offices within the next few years.


There are much better ideas that would strengthen, not destroy the Postal Service, and they are in the Postal Service Protection Act that has been introduced by Rep. Peter DeFazio (D., Ore.) in the House and by me in the Senate. The House bill has 174 co-sponsors. The Senate bill has 27 co-sponsors. First, prefunding must end. The future retiree health fund now has some $50 billion in it. That is enough. This step alone will restore the Postal Service to profitability.

Second, the Postal Service should have the flexibility to provide new consumer products and services—a flexibility that was banned by Congress in 2006. It is now against the law for workers in post offices to notarize or make copies of documents; to cash checks; to deliver wine or beer; or to engage in e-commerce activities (like scanning physical mail into a PDF and sending it through e-mail, selling non-postal products on the Internet or offering a non-commercial version of Gmail).

More..

http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052702304914204579393510572563436

(If you cannot open by clicking, try copy and paste the title onto google. Or, perhaps, find it on Sen. Sanders page)

11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
There's No Need to End Saturday Mail Delivery - Bernie Sanders (Original Post) question everything Mar 2014 OP
Weirdly enough, SheilaT Mar 2014 #1
And, when you add the fact that so many holidays are on a Mondy question everything Mar 2014 #2
Basically, all those Monday holidays SheilaT Mar 2014 #3
And the recent storms question everything Mar 2014 #6
Plus, the office workers often have SheilaT Mar 2014 #7
Maybe I got the point of these posts wrong jeffrey_pdx Mar 2014 #8
I just learned something new. SheilaT Mar 2014 #10
They get 2 days off a week regardless of holidays. jeffrey_pdx Mar 2014 #11
Basically the same thing repubs did to public education. pangaia Mar 2014 #4
K&R.... daleanime Mar 2014 #5
K and R bigwillq Mar 2014 #9
 

SheilaT

(23,156 posts)
1. Weirdly enough,
Sat Mar 8, 2014, 12:09 AM
Mar 2014

I so rarely get mail on Saturdays that a while back I thought they'd already stopped it.

I guess it's just the timing of the mail that comes to me. And no, I don't think we should cut out mail delivery that day. For one thing, the accumulation will make delivery on Monday even harder than it currently is. I have long noticed that my mail arrives much later on Monday than it does later in the week.

question everything

(47,521 posts)
2. And, when you add the fact that so many holidays are on a Mondy
Sat Mar 8, 2014, 12:12 AM
Mar 2014

at least, holidays where there is no mail, Tuesdays are going to be overwhelming.

If they are going to cut a day, it should be a Wednesday or a Thursday or a Friday.


 

SheilaT

(23,156 posts)
3. Basically, all those Monday holidays
Sat Mar 8, 2014, 03:00 AM
Mar 2014

are days we don't get mail.

Those who work for the Federal Govt get all the holidays. Good for them, but it has consequences. Not only do we not get mail those days, but their workload is greatly increased immediately thereafter.

It's not discussed much, but there is a real tension between holidays and people in many work areas having those days off, and the fact that the work then does not get done those days.

Don't get me wrong. I'm in favor of holidays, especially as I have almost always worked jobs where I've worked holidays. That means I'm acutely aware of the fact that a lot of work must still happen those holidays: the very necessary things like police, fire fighters, hospitals, airlines, and so on vs the fact that offices are generally closed (depending on the holiday of course) and the fact that a lot of businesses are open on essentially a volunteer basis, such as retail. Food establishments might theoretically be considered voluntarily open, but in reality the expectation is that they are open 7 days a week 52 weeks a year. I'm old enough to recall when Monday was a traditional day for restaurants to be closed, but that has pretty much disappeared by now.

It is also my observation that those who work office jobs with weekends and holidays off simply have no comprehension of what those other jobs are really like.

question everything

(47,521 posts)
6. And the recent storms
Sat Mar 8, 2014, 12:12 PM
Mar 2014

that swept through the east coast and the super cold temp. in the midwest:

Many were told to stay home. And I was thinking, like you, about the many people who had to go to work. Not just emergency personnel, but retails and restaurants. Yes, people did not go to work, or left early, but this did not mean they did not go shopping, or eating, or even to the neighborhood movie theater.

It is easy to think about office workers who can just shut off and leave early or "stay home." But many cannot.

 

SheilaT

(23,156 posts)
7. Plus, the office workers often have
Sat Mar 8, 2014, 01:28 PM
Mar 2014

sick or vacation days they can use. Sometimes the company or the govt agency will simply forgive the day, paying them without requiring using their own leave. Retail and restaurant workers on the other hand often have no leave time to use. They don't work, they don't get paid.

jeffrey_pdx

(222 posts)
8. Maybe I got the point of these posts wrong
Sat Mar 8, 2014, 05:48 PM
Mar 2014

Most people don't know this, but postal workers are working on those federal holidays. My father and an uncle both work for the USPS and they regularly work on those holidays. Mail just isn't delivered on those days.

 

SheilaT

(23,156 posts)
10. I just learned something new.
Sun Mar 9, 2014, 01:36 AM
Mar 2014

Thank you.

I do NOT mean this sarcastically, but what are they doing on the holidays? What do they do on those days? Do they normally deliver the mail. Why in the world do they not get holidays off?

Personally, I think far too many of us work on weekends and holidays.

jeffrey_pdx

(222 posts)
11. They get 2 days off a week regardless of holidays.
Sun Mar 9, 2014, 02:50 AM
Mar 2014

Last edited Sun Mar 9, 2014, 04:32 PM - Edit history (1)

My uncle drives one of their big trucks, so he does his normal job on holidays.

My Dad has a route. On holidays they help sort mail. Sorting mail is a never ending job at the post office.

ETA: I misspoke. They used to do that, but not any more.

pangaia

(24,324 posts)
4. Basically the same thing repubs did to public education.
Sat Mar 8, 2014, 09:20 AM
Mar 2014

Take money from it, destroy it and then claim it was a failure.
DUH !!!

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»There's No Need to End Sa...