Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Alan Grayson

(485 posts)
Fri Mar 14, 2014, 03:47 PM Mar 2014

It Would Be Nice If Someone In Congress Knew Something

I’m really getting tired of listening to people who don’t know what they’re talking about.

One of the dirty little secrets of Congress is that many of us legislate in areas in which we are utterly bereft of knowledge. If ignorance is bliss, then some of our Members must be deliriously happy. (No wonder Sen. Ted Cruz is always smiling. Green eggs and ham. Yummy!)

Seriously, we have Members on the Agriculture Committee who couldn’t tell a plow from a harvester. We have Members on the Science Committee who couldn’t tell a proton from a photon. We have Members on the Foreign Affairs Committee who couldn’t locate Indonesia on a globe if their lives were at stake. And we have Members on the Intelligence Committee who are as dumb as . . . .

Well, you get the idea. And don’t even ask me about the Ethics Committee.

So that’s why I’m supporting George Gollin for Congress, and why you should support him, too. He actually knows stuff. Lots of stuff.

Even worse, to the extent that Members of Congress know any stuff at all, it’s always the same stuff. According to Roll Call, out of the 435 Members of the House, we have 187 businessmen, 156 lawyers, and 77 educators. Do the math. That leaves 15 Members.

For four years, I worked as an economist. As far as I know, I’m the only Member of Congress who can make that claim. Roll Call did not uncover anyone else. And believe me, whenever I start to talk economics in a Congressional hearing, the eyes glaze over. Quickly.

But don’t worry. Whenever we need an expert opinion on something, we can turn to the three former talk radio hosts in the House. (It was four, until one got caught inhaling cocaine.) Or perhaps we can benefit from the expertise of the former professional football player – whenever it’s third and nine on the Floor of the House.

This is why we need George Gollin in the House. The man actually knows what he’s talking about.

George Gollin is a physicist. In the 70s, he worked on muon scattering, to test quantum chromodynamics theory. (I’m not making this up.) In the 80s, he studied neutral K meson decay, to test for CP violation. (I swear that this is true.) In the 90s, he measured the production and decay properties of heavy quarks. (I kid you not.) Since then, he has specialized in the design and construction of electron-positron colliding beam facilities. (This is indeed bona fide.)

So we can elect George Gollin to Congress, or settle for yet another lawyer/businessman tool. What do you think? And as you consider that question, also consider that the U.S. Department of Energy spends roughly $10 billion a year in taxpayer dollars on physics research, with no one in Congress qualified to do oversight on that effort.

I serve on the House Science and Technology Committee. It is bleak, really bleak. A few months ago, one of our Members on the Committee said that evolution is “a lie straight from the pit of hell.” Most of the Members are climate change deniers. I keep encouraging them to transfer from the House Science Committee to the House Religion Committee, and follow their true calling. (There is no House Religion Committee, but their eyes light up anyway, when I tell them that.)

I need George Gollin’s help on the Science Committee, and in Congress. So we should help him get there.

Here’s another really good thing about George Gollin – he’s a liberal Democrat, and he’s not afraid to say so. In fact, that’s exactly what his TV ad says – that he’s a proud progressive Democrat. For that reason alone, he deserves our support. A progressive who is proud to be a progressive – how refreshing! I hope that this catches on.

By the way, there is another good progressive in this three-way primary, named David Green. I respect Green’s stands on the issues, but I don’t think that he has a chance to win. Gollin does.

George Gollin is in a tough primary race on Tuesday. It looks like he’ll come in ahead of David Green, but his real opponent is a Democrat-in-name-only, the choice of the local political machine, who appears to suffer from issuephobia. She’s a lawyer. Maybe Congress always will be crawling with witless lawyers and businessman, like vermin. But if someone like George Gollin can win, then maybe not. Maybe there is hope.

To help George Gollin win his primary on Tuesday, click here. Because George Gollin has both a head and a heart.

Courage,

Rep. Alan Grayson

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
It Would Be Nice If Someone In Congress Knew Something (Original Post) Alan Grayson Mar 2014 OP
gollin is my pick for il cd 13 questionseverything Mar 2014 #1
It would be good to have a physicist in Congress. Sunlei Mar 2014 #2
Rep. Rush Holt (D-NJ)...Ph.D. Physics 1981 xocet Mar 2014 #5
Knowing something is not the reason they're elected. rock Mar 2014 #3
Tweeted for Alan Grayson! yuiyoshida Mar 2014 #4

xocet

(3,871 posts)
5. Rep. Rush Holt (D-NJ)...Ph.D. Physics 1981
Sat Mar 15, 2014, 01:46 AM
Mar 2014

Here is a link to the abstract of his doctoral thesis:

Calcium absorption lines and solar activity: A systematic program of observations
Holt, R. D.
Ph.D. Thesis New York Univ., New York.

An observatory was erected at New York University to carry out a long term program of solar spectral observations in support of an effort to compare the line shapes of the chromospheric calcium spectral lines of the Sun viewed as a star with the corresponding ones of other stars. The facility has a plane mirror, equatorial mount heliostat which directs spatially integrated sunlight into a 1.8 meter Ebert-Fastie spectrometer with a resolution of about 0.03 Angstroms. Calcium H and K spectral line profiles are measured photoelectrically, displayed in analog form, and stored digitally. Data are taken almost daily. The construction of the observatory, the observational procedure, and the treatment of the data collected are described. The general nature of solar and stellar activity are reviewed and theories of the formation of the H and K lines in the chromosphere are discussed. Parameters characterizing the line shape are defined. Changes in these parameters, especially that describing asymmetry, correlate with other measures of solar activity.


http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1981PhDT.........4H

rock

(13,218 posts)
3. Knowing something is not the reason they're elected.
Fri Mar 14, 2014, 04:46 PM
Mar 2014

Adult elections work pretty much like school elections.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»It Would Be Nice If Someo...