2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumRevenge of the sociopaths: Why GOP shut Jeb Bush’s compassion down
The party of Ann Coulter and Karl Rove doesn't want a lecture on tolerance. But there's a political motive, tooDIGBY
If theres ever been a case of a serious presidential contender who doesnt seem to have the fire in the belly, its Jeb Bush. He makes Fred Thompsons somnambulent performance in 2008 look like Rahm Emanuel after shooting a triple espresso.
How else, for example, to explain what seem to be public utterances of an incoherent interior dialogue on the subject of immigration? It was just a few months ago that many in the GOP establishment called for the smelling salts over his rejection of a path to citizenship in his book called Immigration Wars: Forging an American Solution, when various wags whispered that it appeared he was politically rusty and out of step.
Then, this week he switched gears and declared that so-called illegal immigration is an act of love calling forth the condemnation of none other than his brothers brain Karl Rove, who ominously warned him against using such terms and issued a pointed reminder that Rick Perry was roundly chastised for declaring that people who opposed immigration reform were heartless. (Its one thing to deny millions of people basic human rights, its quite another to imply that those who deny them are somehow lacking in compassion. Lets have some civility here, people!)
If theres one thing weve learned from our recent forays into the issue, its that immigration reform is the third rail of GOP politics. Even the crudest Tea Partier knows that the demographics are working against them, but the nativist strain of Americas right wing is a powerful and enduring force that strongly resists legalizing undocumented immigrants for both cultural and political reasons. This analysis of a Washington Post poll last January shows the thin line all GOP hopefuls will have to walk:
more
http://www.salon.com/2014/04/09/revenge_of_the_sociopaths_why_gop_shut_jeb_bushs_compassion_down/
CJCRANE
(18,184 posts)Everyone else can go...you know what.
Proud Liberal Dem
(24,429 posts)Candidates are pretty much screwed no matter what position they take: If they tack to the center and try to make themselves palatable to the mainstream electorate, the wingnuts get mad, if they tack to the far right, they please the wingnuts and make themselves look crazy to everybody else. It's a no-win scenario for them.
stevenleser
(32,886 posts)mercuryblues
(14,537 posts)don't believe it for a second. he is aiming for more of that "compassionate conservatism" pie in the sky. He knows the teafucks will vote for him anyhow, so he is hoping to skim off enough of the Latino vote to win.
Christie was picked off for a reason. Does anyone think that the bridge scandal is a little too convenient.
Remember this is the boosh family cartel and there is nothing they won't do to win a presidency.