Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Purveyor

(29,876 posts)
Mon Apr 28, 2014, 06:32 PM Apr 2014

Rand Paul Remains A Fake Or A Dunce

I read that Senator Aqua Buddha is out there rewriting history again. The Great Populist Hope is promising to bring back the glory days of Reaganomics, which is when all the economic ills bedeviling the middle class began, and he is doing so by being either stupid or dishonest.

"What did Ronald Reagan do, did he come forward and say ‘Oh, lets just cut taxes for low-income people?" he said. "No! He said forthrightly ‘Let's cut everyone's taxes.' He did dramatically. The top rate, that's what rich people pay, the top rate was 70%, he lowered it to 50% then he lowered it again to 28% and 20 million jobs were created!"


Return with us now to those thrilling days of yesteryear. Reagan did nothing "forthrightly" in his first budget. (David Stockman, in the interview with Bill Greider that got Stockman in trouble, admitted that the first Reagan budget was "a Trojan horse to bring down the top rate.&quot As to the rest of the passage, well, Aqua Buddha got stomped pretty badly back at the beginning of April when he took this rap out for a spin in New Hampshire, and by FactCheck.org of all people.

He is trafficking here in one of the primary myths of Republican politics -- the Reagan "Recovery," whereby the only relevant numbers are the ones produced after the massive recession of 1982. (This is not unlike the "Bush kept us safe, if you ignore that one bad day in 2001," trope.) The 1982 recession was so bad that the Democrats picked up 27 seats in the House during the 1982 midterm elections, which is why the golden days of Tip'nRonnie happened in the first place. Nonetheless, Aqua Buddha is spinning the tale again.

http://www.esquire.com/blogs/politics/rand-paul-reaganomics-042814

14 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Rand Paul Remains A Fake Or A Dunce (Original Post) Purveyor Apr 2014 OP
I am going with a bloodless fake and a dunce. merrily Apr 2014 #1
I agree with bloodless fake PatrickforO Apr 2014 #5
I'm a pacifist, but I'm sticking with dunce. Here's why. merrily Apr 2014 #7
Not that those choices are ashling Apr 2014 #2
I vote for Dunce Gothmog Apr 2014 #3
A toupee wearing a dunce cap Blue Owl Apr 2014 #4
Now that I think about Rand Paul a bit, I'm doubling down with heartless fake PatrickforO Apr 2014 #8
hahaha SummerSnow Apr 2014 #6
Or? .....methinks "and" is more applicable...nt Wounded Bear Apr 2014 #9
, blkmusclmachine Apr 2014 #10
Anything BUT a fake Cosmocat Apr 2014 #11
He does his part of hanging on to a nice large chunk of republican votes. Sunlei Apr 2014 #12
Dumb as rocks for sure demigoddess Apr 2014 #13
Or both KamaAina Apr 2014 #14

PatrickforO

(14,576 posts)
5. I agree with bloodless fake
Mon Apr 28, 2014, 07:40 PM
Apr 2014

The libertarian evangel sounds great unless you're old, poor, sick or different. In that case you have the privilege of enduring horrible suffering in this exceptional country.

That said, I do agree with Paul on one thing: we don't need any more wars, and we spend far too much on military-industrial jobs programs like the Abrams tank. Paul's right on that one.

Everything else? Not so much.

merrily

(45,251 posts)
7. I'm a pacifist, but I'm sticking with dunce. Here's why.
Mon Apr 28, 2014, 07:52 PM
Apr 2014

Best I can tell, the freedom that Libertarians want most is freedom from taxation. The big difference between them and Republicans, as far as I can tell, is that Republicans want to limit spending of tax dollars to nothing besides war, while Libertarians are not that crazy about spending tax dollars for even war.

I don't think an intelligent foreign policy can be based on either "Don't tax me for anything, even military spending," or "Tax me only for military spending."

PatrickforO

(14,576 posts)
8. Now that I think about Rand Paul a bit, I'm doubling down with heartless fake
Mon Apr 28, 2014, 07:58 PM
Apr 2014

and I'll tell you why. A couple years ago, there was a disaster, and Sen. Paul tacked a 'sanctity of life' amendment onto the relief bill. The result of this, of course, was that the bill was delayed, and more importantly, material aid was delayed to fellow Americans who were homeless, jobless, without transportation, and even without food and potable water.

I wrote a letter to Sen. Paul reminding him that he is a public servant and for him to delay aid to people who desperately need it for the sake of a narrow ideology is unconscionable. To his credit, he wrote me back and told me that he always has been and always will be 100% pro-life and that he would advance such legislation as and when he wished.

Rand Paul: loyal to a cause? You bet

Loyal to the American people? Not at all - it's everyone for him/herself!

Cosmocat

(14,564 posts)
11. Anything BUT a fake
Tue Apr 29, 2014, 07:52 AM
Apr 2014

dumber than a box of rocks for sure.

But, I think he is very clearly what he is ...

There is nothing fake about it.

A self entitled, son of privilege taking the mantle of the you can have what you want without paying for it machine.

Sunlei

(22,651 posts)
12. He does his part of hanging on to a nice large chunk of republican votes.
Tue Apr 29, 2014, 08:44 AM
Apr 2014

I'm sure he will be rewarded with a wholesale buy of whatever next 'book' he puts up for sale. Some republican campaign will buy a couple thousand copies for their campaigns party gifts.

demigoddess

(6,641 posts)
13. Dumb as rocks for sure
Tue Apr 29, 2014, 10:27 AM
Apr 2014

he has shown that over and over. He seems to think in sound bites not facts. I think he is another like shrub who is trying to outdo his smarter father.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Rand Paul Remains A Fake ...