2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumRand Paul Remains A Fake Or A Dunce
I read that Senator Aqua Buddha is out there rewriting history again. The Great Populist Hope is promising to bring back the glory days of Reaganomics, which is when all the economic ills bedeviling the middle class began, and he is doing so by being either stupid or dishonest.
"What did Ronald Reagan do, did he come forward and say Oh, lets just cut taxes for low-income people?" he said. "No! He said forthrightly Let's cut everyone's taxes.' He did dramatically. The top rate, that's what rich people pay, the top rate was 70%, he lowered it to 50% then he lowered it again to 28% and 20 million jobs were created!"
Return with us now to those thrilling days of yesteryear. Reagan did nothing "forthrightly" in his first budget. (David Stockman, in the interview with Bill Greider that got Stockman in trouble, admitted that the first Reagan budget was "a Trojan horse to bring down the top rate." As to the rest of the passage, well, Aqua Buddha got stomped pretty badly back at the beginning of April when he took this rap out for a spin in New Hampshire, and by FactCheck.org of all people.
He is trafficking here in one of the primary myths of Republican politics -- the Reagan "Recovery," whereby the only relevant numbers are the ones produced after the massive recession of 1982. (This is not unlike the "Bush kept us safe, if you ignore that one bad day in 2001," trope.) The 1982 recession was so bad that the Democrats picked up 27 seats in the House during the 1982 midterm elections, which is why the golden days of Tip'nRonnie happened in the first place. Nonetheless, Aqua Buddha is spinning the tale again.
http://www.esquire.com/blogs/politics/rand-paul-reaganomics-042814
merrily
(45,251 posts)PatrickforO
(14,576 posts)The libertarian evangel sounds great unless you're old, poor, sick or different. In that case you have the privilege of enduring horrible suffering in this exceptional country.
That said, I do agree with Paul on one thing: we don't need any more wars, and we spend far too much on military-industrial jobs programs like the Abrams tank. Paul's right on that one.
Everything else? Not so much.
merrily
(45,251 posts)Best I can tell, the freedom that Libertarians want most is freedom from taxation. The big difference between them and Republicans, as far as I can tell, is that Republicans want to limit spending of tax dollars to nothing besides war, while Libertarians are not that crazy about spending tax dollars for even war.
I don't think an intelligent foreign policy can be based on either "Don't tax me for anything, even military spending," or "Tax me only for military spending."
ashling
(25,771 posts)mutually exclusive
Gothmog
(145,291 posts)Rand Paul is not that bright
Blue Owl
(50,391 posts)PatrickforO
(14,576 posts)and I'll tell you why. A couple years ago, there was a disaster, and Sen. Paul tacked a 'sanctity of life' amendment onto the relief bill. The result of this, of course, was that the bill was delayed, and more importantly, material aid was delayed to fellow Americans who were homeless, jobless, without transportation, and even without food and potable water.
I wrote a letter to Sen. Paul reminding him that he is a public servant and for him to delay aid to people who desperately need it for the sake of a narrow ideology is unconscionable. To his credit, he wrote me back and told me that he always has been and always will be 100% pro-life and that he would advance such legislation as and when he wished.
Rand Paul: loyal to a cause? You bet
Loyal to the American people? Not at all - it's everyone for him/herself!
SummerSnow
(12,608 posts)Wounded Bear
(58,662 posts)blkmusclmachine
(16,149 posts)Cosmocat
(14,564 posts)dumber than a box of rocks for sure.
But, I think he is very clearly what he is ...
There is nothing fake about it.
A self entitled, son of privilege taking the mantle of the you can have what you want without paying for it machine.
Sunlei
(22,651 posts)I'm sure he will be rewarded with a wholesale buy of whatever next 'book' he puts up for sale. Some republican campaign will buy a couple thousand copies for their campaigns party gifts.
demigoddess
(6,641 posts)he has shown that over and over. He seems to think in sound bites not facts. I think he is another like shrub who is trying to outdo his smarter father.
KamaAina
(78,249 posts):fake: