2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumFree Press activist: Ted Cruz is confused about what ‘net neutrality’ even means
Texas conservative Sen. Ted Cruz (R) said in a statement on Tuesday that the Federal Communications Commission should be stripped of its ability to regulate net neutrality.
Congress, not an unelected commission, should take the lead on Internet policy, he said.
Matt Wood, policy director for the Internet freedom group Free Press, told Raw Story that Cruzs suggestions about the law are based on a fundamental misunderstanding of the situation, and that the lawmakers proposal would make Internet freedom vulnerable to the interests of powerful corporations like AT&T and Comcast.
After years of wrangling over whether Internet providers could create so-called fast lanes for their content, the FCC bunted on Thursday. The regulatory commission passed Protecting and Promoting the Open Internet, a set of preliminary rules meant to protect net neutrality, but leaving broad swaths of policy open-ended and asking for public discussion.
Activists on all sides of the question have made their cases for weeks. Internet Service Providers and their supporters like Cruz would like to keep regulations off the books altogether, allowing the companies to set their own policies with regards to broadband. They argue that the FCC doesnt have the jurisdiction to impose rules on ISPs.
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2014/05/16/free-press-activist-ted-cruz-is-confused-about-what-net-neutrality-even-means/
Blue Owl
(50,435 posts)<>
hlthe2b
(102,298 posts)Good gawd...He is SO willfully ignorant...
MindMover
(5,016 posts)dballance
(5,756 posts)It astounds me that he managed to go to Ivy League universities for both his undergrad and JD. How he didn't manage to get some sort of broadening of his mind is a question.
I have this sneaking feeling he knew how to answer the questions to pass the tests and the bar - even if didn't believe in the answers. I think he believes he's doing "God's" work so it was okay to answer the questions in a way he could pass so he change things for "God."
Enrique
(27,461 posts)more accurate to call it "Orwellian" as Raw Story does further down in the article. i.e. any "confusion" is deliberate