Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

TwilightGardener

(46,416 posts)
1. How long were these guys going to be in Gitmo, and what would the justification
Sun Jun 1, 2014, 06:45 PM
Jun 2014

be for keeping them past 2014 anyway? What would, or could, be done with them, Bergdahl aside? The whole war lasting as long as it did was stupid, and starting Gitmo was stupid, and now Obama is tasked with cleaning up the mess that no one feels good about.

busterbrown

(8,515 posts)
2. Ted Cruz stated this a.m. on ABC(?) that Bergdahi who was in very serious medical condition wouldn't
Sun Jun 1, 2014, 06:58 PM
Jun 2014

have approved of the action taken by our govt... He’s nothing but a piece of slime..

Just found Rice’s statement on Huffington Post..

"This is a very special situation," Rice said. "Sergeant Bergdahl wasn't simply a hostage, he was an American prisoner of war, captured on the battlefield. We have a sacred obligation that we have upheld since the founding of our Republic to do our utmost to bring back our men and women who were taken in battle. And we did that in this instance."

Rice noted that, in the 21st century, "some of our adversaries may not be traditional state actors," but that failing to negotiate the release of a prisoner of war based on that "would break faith with the American people and with the men and women who serve in uniform."

"Regardless of who may be holding an American prisoner of war, we must do our best to bring him or her back," Rice said.

Rice also defended the decision to go forward with the release without consulting Congress. She said the administration consulted with both the Department of Defense and the Department of Justice and "determined that it was both appropriate and necessary for us to proceed in an expedited fashion." Rice said the administration had "in the past had extensive consultations with Congress" about the Bergdahl situation and that legislators "were well aware that this idea and this prospect was one that the administration was seriously considering."

"We had reason to be concerned that this was an urgent and an acute situation, that his life could have been at risk," she said. "We did not have 30 days to wait. And had we waited and lost him, I don't think anybody would have forgiven the United States government."

TwilightGardener

(46,416 posts)
3. Ted Cruz is simply dumb as ass. I've yet to see evidence of his brains.
Sun Jun 1, 2014, 07:05 PM
Jun 2014

Bergdahl is probably a mess, emotionally if not physically--nobody is sure where he's at mentally, at this point. For Cruz to say such a thing tells me his only insight into Bergdahl's situation is having once read heroic POW accounts from WW2 or Vietnam and applying that to this case. He really should STFU on military matters, he knows nothing.

busterbrown

(8,515 posts)
4. Bullshit!!! Cruz’s military record speaks for itself...
Sun Jun 1, 2014, 07:18 PM
Jun 2014

You know the one he is making up in his damaged mind( imagination) right now...

jmowreader

(50,557 posts)
7. Whatchu talkin bout Willis? Ted Cruz has a stellar military record!
Mon Jun 2, 2014, 05:05 AM
Jun 2014

Why, he sat through an entire screening of "When Eagles Dare" without once screaming, "Couldn't you fuckers find one German actor?"

Kablooie

(18,634 posts)
6. So they release 5 of the worst Taliban leaders while the innocent taxi drivers have to stay.
Sun Jun 1, 2014, 09:31 PM
Jun 2014

Something just isn't right about this.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Well, you knew this would...