2016 Postmortem

Peacetrain

(22,876 posts) Wed Jun 25, 2014, 12:39 PM Jun 2014

People have an opinion about canidates for a reason..

Whether for or against.

Listening to the other side, will cause no one any harm.

Understanding that when a poster is passionate about or works hard for a particular canidate to get them on a ticket or elected.. name calling of that canidate is going to raise hackles.

Just saying..

4 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

People have an opinion about canidates for a reason.. (Original Post) Peacetrain Jun 2014 OP

It's early and may be helpful to hear more about TBF Jun 2014 #1

I think you are right.. Peacetrain Jun 2014 #2

As it should be bigwillq Jun 2014 #3

You mean you're savalez Jun 2014 #4

TBF

(32,060 posts)

1. It's early and may be helpful to hear more about

Reply to Peacetrain (Original post)

Wed Jun 25, 2014, 12:44 PM

Jun 2014

some of the up and comers (O'Malley, Julian Castro). I really doubt the primary season will be just Hillary v. Elizabeth. In that sense I'd like to hear more about many potential candidates.

But I also have a feeling some of the actual name calling and that sort of thing are folks trying to cause rifts and divide dems.

Peacetrain

(22,876 posts)

2. I think you are right..

Reply to TBF (Reply #1)

Wed Jun 25, 2014, 12:48 PM

Jun 2014

Nothing is set in stone.. hearing everyone out is a good thing..

And being respectful of those who have put in the hard work for their chosen canidate.. by not calling that canidate names .. wouldn't hurt.

I know some say it is about passion to attack other canidates with a fury.. but never knew an insult to work to change anyone's mind or bring them over to a particular side..