Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumHave We Been Reading the Declaration of Independence All Wrong?
ABBY OHLHEISER
Here's some fun news for the Fourth of July: America might be reading an important passage of the Declaration of Independence all wrong. A scholar's argument that an authoritative transcription of the Declaration contains a period that isn't actually in the original document has convinced the National Archives to re-examine their presentation of the document. That's according to a well-timed New York Times story on the controversy, which could change how we read the passage beginning "We hold these truths to be self-evident."
First, let's pinpoint what's in question here. The official transcription from the National Archives reads (emphasis ours):
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.
See that period? According to Princeton professor Danielle Allen, it's not actually in the original document. If she's right, then the individual rights of "Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness" would share a sentence with what follows:
That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.
Allen, speaking to the Times, argues that Thomas Jefferson intended to emphasize the second part of this passage the role of the government equally with the individual rights in the first part. Instead, with the period in place, there's an implied hierarchy. So you can begin to see how one little punctuation mark's presence or absence could become the subject of heated debate among those who have strong opinions about the role of government as it concerns individual liberty. Although the punctuation mark is still very much up for debate among experts, Allen has convinced several scholars that she might be on to something. The National Archives told the Times that they "want to take advantage of this possible new discovery" and find a way to re-examine the incredibly fragile original Declaration of Independence.
more
http://www.thewire.com/culture/2014/07/typo-could-mean-weve-been-reading-the-declaration-of-independence-all-wrong/373915/
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
7 replies, 1529 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (6)
ReplyReply to this post
7 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Have We Been Reading the Declaration of Independence All Wrong? (Original Post)
DonViejo
Jul 2014
OP
I can buy that Jefferson was an anti-federaltist who wanted the bill of rights so it's
craigmatic
Jul 2014
#4
It is interesting but we use the Constitution not the Declaration as the basis of law.
former9thward
Jul 2014
#5
enlightenment
(8,830 posts)1. Interesting.
It is very clearly a semi-colon in the draft version - and since he used a semi-colon later in the same paragraph, it is easy to compare the two marks.
COLGATE4
(14,732 posts)2. Without doubt you are correct, which means
that the thought continues with "that to secure these rights...". It's one coherent thought, not two hierarchical paragraphs.
littlemissmartypants
(22,692 posts)3. Today would be a good day to just burn
It and start over. Ok, seriously, punctuation matters. Interesting thread? Indeed!
craigmatic
(4,510 posts)4. I can buy that Jefferson was an anti-federaltist who wanted the bill of rights so it's
not a stretch to believe that he wanted individual rights equal with a role of the government.
former9thward
(32,025 posts)5. It is interesting but we use the Constitution not the Declaration as the basis of law.
So it seems somewhat academic.
YoungDemCA
(5,714 posts)6. The Declaration seems to hold a bigger place in American cultural mythology/civil religion though
So it's not academic in that sense.
YoungDemCA
(5,714 posts)7. K&R
Very interesting.