Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DonViejo

(60,536 posts)
Thu Jul 10, 2014, 10:16 AM Jul 2014

Liberals Need to Learn to Say No

Bernhard Schlink

The legal theorist Richard Weisberg argues that rather than castigate conservatives for their intransigence, liberals ought to become more infliexible themselves.


The Latin proverb “Times Change and We Change With Them” used to be memorized by generations of students of Latin. Today its truth seems more obvious than ever before. The progress of science, the spread of the internet, the globalization of business and finance, the transformation of the working environment, the diversification of familial structures, the threats of terrorism—how might we cope with these changes without being adaptable and flexible? Given the speed of change, yesterday’s experiences and beliefs seem inadequate to meeting tomorrow’s challenges, unless we constantly negotiate and compromise them with new demands.

The liberal mindset is particularly suited to flexibility and compromise. It lives with the heritage of the enlightenment, its idea that all human beings are rational and can find rational solutions for their problems and conflicts, its advocacy of tolerance, its affinity to relativism, its turn against dogmatism. And the liberal mindset is often irritated and even offended when it encounters others who are intransigent, inflexible, unwilling to compromise.

Richard Weisberg’s In Praise of Intransigence: The Perils of Flexibility comes as a surprise and a provocation—and is the right book at the right moment. It comes as a surprise because the author is himself an heir of the enlightenment and defines his political and moral position left of center. It is a provocation because it turns common liberal notions of what’s right and what’s wrong upside down. And it is the right book at the right moment, because today the political and moral position left of center does not run the risk of being too intransigent, but rather of being too compromising. In times of too much intransigence, we need a call for flexibility. In our times of too much flexibility, Weisberg’s call for intransigence reminds us of our duty to hold on to what’s right.

Weisberg begins with the present, with conflicts over abortion, over the teaching of creationism in school, over gun control, and over the use of torture, unlimited detention, and targeted killing in the fight against terrorism. He describes the left’s tendency to attack the right’s unwillingness to compromise instead of answering the right’s substantive arguments forcefully with its own substantive arguments. Instead of battling over beliefs, behavior, and politics, the left engages in battles over the willingness or unwillingness to compromise. And in proving its own willingness to compromise, the left, particularly in times of emergency, sells out its best and deepest values. Weisberg’s American experience matches my German experience: he was as stunned as I was to watch colleagues abandon the taboo on torture because they felt that hard times justified hard means.

more
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2014/07/10/liberals-need-to-learn-to-say-no.html
37 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Liberals Need to Learn to Say No (Original Post) DonViejo Jul 2014 OP
Ding! Doctor_J Jul 2014 #1
I have no problem with a DINO that takes a Republican seat awake Jul 2014 #29
your screen name must be sarcasm Doctor_J Jul 2014 #31
If there was more support for our president I do believe we would be better off awake Jul 2014 #33
liberals need to stand up for themselves samsingh Jul 2014 #2
Ted Rall explains: corkhead Jul 2014 #3
I only buy a portion of the "flexibility" argument. littlemissmartypants Jul 2014 #4
sure do heaven05 Jul 2014 #5
SMH. littlemissmartypants Jul 2014 #7
I'm wrong? heaven05 Jul 2014 #8
No love. They have been littlemissmartypants Jul 2014 #10
yep, I agree, totally heaven05 Jul 2014 #11
Agreed ... 1StrongBlackMan Jul 2014 #9
Well said. nt littlemissmartypants Jul 2014 #12
What inflexible stands have liberals taken in the last 30 years? rhett o rick Jul 2014 #16
don't think you're going to get an answer to that one Doctor_J Jul 2014 #32
The Conservative Dems want to trash liberals by claiming they are inflexible. rhett o rick Jul 2014 #35
You are so wrong. Enthusiast Jul 2014 #20
There is no compromising with the devil. nm rhett o rick Jul 2014 #36
OK, I'll give it a try: NealK Jul 2014 #6
I suggest that Weisberg ... 1StrongBlackMan Jul 2014 #13
Yours should be tested at a battered spouse's home, bet it goes swimmingly. TheKentuckian Jul 2014 #25
The dems exhibit symptoms of battered spouse syndrome Doctor_J Jul 2014 #34
No ... 1StrongBlackMan Jul 2014 #37
We keep steadily losing ground and yet congratulate ourselves for not backsliding even faster. RufusTFirefly Jul 2014 #14
Perfect analogy! Thanks! nt COLGATE4 Jul 2014 #30
Wonderful way to ensure that liberals finish making Gov't unworkable salib Jul 2014 #15
The flexible pseudo-liberals have given away almost everything. Except maybe Social Security and rhett o rick Jul 2014 #17
+1 Enthusiast Jul 2014 #19
The taboo on torture should have been an absolute. Enthusiast Jul 2014 #18
K&R JoeyT Jul 2014 #21
Exactly. Democrats should stand for what they believe in, not give in to Republicans. Louisiana1976 Jul 2014 #28
No, no, it's important that we meet the Republicans half-way. And when they then .... Scuba Jul 2014 #22
What is bizarre Cosmocat Jul 2014 #23
Much of that is the fault of a marketing strategy heavily based on minimizing and avoiding TheKentuckian Jul 2014 #26
yep Cosmocat Jul 2014 #27
Post removed Post removed Jul 2014 #24

awake

(3,226 posts)
29. I have no problem with a DINO that takes a Republican seat
Sat Jul 12, 2014, 04:11 PM
Jul 2014

I do have a big problem with week kneed, appeasing whimsy ass Demarcates who cave to Republican pressure and do not back our president

 

Doctor_J

(36,392 posts)
31. your screen name must be sarcasm
Sat Jul 12, 2014, 05:03 PM
Jul 2014

The only dems who cave to republican pressure are the dinos like our president. Otoh, the ones who oppose him are the real dems who are against endless war, union busting, school privatization, fracking, TPP, drone murder, etc.

Do you really believe everyone should support him on TPP???

awake

(3,226 posts)
33. If there was more support for our president I do believe we would be better off
Sat Jul 12, 2014, 05:10 PM
Jul 2014

For example while I would like a single payer health care Obama Care is way better than what we had, but too many Democrats are afraid to support it out of fear.

corkhead

(6,119 posts)
3. Ted Rall explains:
Thu Jul 10, 2014, 11:34 AM
Jul 2014
Comedian Bill Maher gave them a million cash dollars — yet Democrats don’t agree with him on anything. Why? Because he hates Republicans even more.

Why didn’t Maher save his money? Or better yet, fund a group or a writer or an artist who promotes ideas he actually agrees with? Because he, like tens of millions of other liberals, are stuck in the two-party trap.

The relationship between liberals and Democrats is dysfunctional and enabling, abused pathetics sucking up to cruel abusers. Progressives like Maher are like a kid with two rotten parents. The dad drinks and hits him; the mom drinks less and hits him less. The best call is to run away from home — instead, most children in that situation will draw closer to their mothers.


http://rall.com/2014/07/03/syndicated-column-at-some-point-progressives-need-to-grow-a-pair-and-stop-having-anything-to-do-with-the-democratic-party

littlemissmartypants

(22,722 posts)
10. No love. They have been
Thu Jul 10, 2014, 01:10 PM
Jul 2014

A disappointment in many ways. Harry pipes up occasionally. But they all look old and tired too often.

 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
9. Agreed ...
Thu Jul 10, 2014, 01:09 PM
Jul 2014

But more, the OP neglects to describe the inevitable result of his "inflexible/unwilling to compromise" strategy in real life (of governing) ... Anarchy, as government breaks down further, since there is no way to find the common, or acceptable, ground upon which to govern.

It sounds good and makes for the appearance of toughness (a trait that has bled into the liberal psyche); but to what end?

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
16. What inflexible stands have liberals taken in the last 30 years?
Thu Jul 10, 2014, 01:56 PM
Jul 2014

The hard stand against the IWar? Against tax cuts for the wealthy? Saving Social Security? Helping our vets?

What hard stands that liberals have taken don't you approve of?

 

Doctor_J

(36,392 posts)
32. don't think you're going to get an answer to that one
Sat Jul 12, 2014, 05:08 PM
Jul 2014

The republicans have taken over by holding their ground on everything. 1sbm's post is completely absurd. It's the end result of worshipping someone who is supposed to work for you.

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
35. The Conservative Dems want to trash liberals by claiming they are inflexible.
Sat Jul 12, 2014, 08:16 PM
Jul 2014

And I won't argue. When we get down to little left to defend we have to draw the line and tell the bastards to fuck off. I am inflexible on a lot of things, like destroying SS and/or Medicare. Sorry, no compromise.

 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
13. I suggest that Weisberg ...
Thu Jul 10, 2014, 01:13 PM
Jul 2014

put his theory to test is his marriage and get back to us.

We can all meet up at the local singles bar ... then, we can watch him apply that to his establishing other relationships.

TheKentuckian

(25,029 posts)
25. Yours should be tested at a battered spouse's home, bet it goes swimmingly.
Sat Jul 12, 2014, 02:38 PM
Jul 2014

Also, you've had your way for twenty years and the shit is not really working for most of us and seems to be on a rather intolerable trajectory with ever less ability to change course.

No, appeasement and assimilation will not carry the day better chaos than cruel and wicked order based on soulless extraction.

 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
37. No ...
Sat Jul 12, 2014, 09:37 PM
Jul 2014

I've NOT had my way ... ever, in this society.

But that said ... we have two choices in governance in this/our form of government ... work together or get nothing done.

We can pretend that the OP's theory is a viable political strategy; but in the real world, it leads to none governance ... and that vacuum benefits only the 1%.

RufusTFirefly

(8,812 posts)
14. We keep steadily losing ground and yet congratulate ourselves for not backsliding even faster.
Thu Jul 10, 2014, 01:15 PM
Jul 2014

It's really quite pathetic.

salib

(2,116 posts)
15. Wonderful way to ensure that liberals finish making Gov't unworkable
Thu Jul 10, 2014, 01:20 PM
Jul 2014

Yeah, let's just turn "common liberal notions of what’s right and what’s wrong upside down". Yeah, that's the ticket.

Throw the baby out with the bath water.

Clever.

No! I am a liberal. I know how to say no.

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
17. The flexible pseudo-liberals have given away almost everything. Except maybe Social Security and
Thu Jul 10, 2014, 01:59 PM
Jul 2014

they even made a run at that. The few things we have gained didn't come from being flexible.

Enthusiast

(50,983 posts)
18. The taboo on torture should have been an absolute.
Thu Jul 10, 2014, 02:03 PM
Jul 2014

It shouldn't even be a matter of opinion. It is an entirely black and white issue. It was an impeachable offense.

JoeyT

(6,785 posts)
21. K&R
Thu Jul 10, 2014, 08:27 PM
Jul 2014

If Republicans are so awful, stop telling us that we need to do more things they want.

If Republicans aren't that awful, stop pestering all of us about how important elections are.

We can't run on a platform that amounts to "That party is full of awful people that want to destroy the world and everything in it." then turn around and do whatever they want us to do so we look reasonable. It doesn't make us look reasonable, it makes us look weak and stupid.

 

Scuba

(53,475 posts)
22. No, no, it's important that we meet the Republicans half-way. And when they then ....
Fri Jul 11, 2014, 07:08 AM
Jul 2014

... move further right, we need to move half-way again. How is standing up for traditional Democratic Party principles ever going to inspire voters? Much better that we abandon them in search of the mythical "moderate Republican".

Cosmocat

(14,567 posts)
23. What is bizarre
Fri Jul 11, 2014, 09:52 AM
Jul 2014

is that the "middle" subscribes to this mindless "they are all the same" thing even when the republicans are absolute, 100 percent jackasses and dems (the pols and establishment) are cowering in a corner afraid of their own shadows.

They get the stink of being intransient even when they aren't.

I keep noting this, our focus is on just how extraordinarily horrible Rs are, but just the same, Democrats are all but worthless right now.

We have a Democratic President and because Rs scream like Banshees, Ds have left him out there all alone for all but a few moments of his entire tenure.

TheKentuckian

(25,029 posts)
26. Much of that is the fault of a marketing strategy heavily based on minimizing and avoiding
Sat Jul 12, 2014, 02:49 PM
Jul 2014

the real differences in the parties and efforts to reduce them in actuality have borne the fruit of blowback.

I don't get the anger and frustration that folks are confused when that was the original intent. Did we think only the right leaning would be deceived? I don't get it.

Cosmocat

(14,567 posts)
27. yep
Sat Jul 12, 2014, 03:07 PM
Jul 2014

it is about being scared, frankly. Scared of the labels, scared of the anger.

ACA is an example. Democrats should have OWNED it, there was no other play. Fight for it and take a stand on it. Instead, they barely managed to get it passed then immediately cowered in a corner while republicans threw every bit of shit they could grab against the wall about it and while the results have been fairly decent and most everyone who HAS it likes it, the entire country thinks it is the worst thing ever.

Response to DonViejo (Original post)

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Liberals Need to Learn to...