Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumObama’s Understated Foreign Policy Gains
Obamas Understated Foreign Policy Gains
By MICHAEL A. COHENJULY 9, 2014
Its been a pretty good couple of weeks for American foreign policy. No, seriously.
On June 23, the last of Syrias chemical weapons stockpile was loaded onto a Danish freighter to be destroyed. The following day, President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia asked his Parliament to rescind the permission that it had given him to send troops into Ukraine. Meanwhile, there is still cautious optimism that a nuclear deal with Iran is within reach.
What do these have in common? They were achieved without a single American bomb being dropped and they relied on a combination of diplomacy, economic sanctions and the coercive threat of military force. As policy makers and pundits remain focused on Iraq and the perennial but distracting discussion about the use of force, these modest but significant achievements have, perhaps predictably, been ignored. Yet they hold important lessons for how American power can be most effectively deployed today.
Nine months ago, President Obama eschewed military means to punish Syria for its use of chemical weapons and instead negotiated an agreement to remove them. Critics like Senator John McCain blasted it as a loser deal that would never work. By refusing to back up a stated red line with military force, Mr. Obama had supposedly weakened American credibility.
In Damascus, however, the threat of military engagement by the United States was taken more seriously. And when given the choice between American bombing or giving up his chemical weapons, President Bashar al-Assad of Syria chose the latter.
more
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/07/10/opinion/obamas-understated-foreign-policy-gains.html?_r=0
By MICHAEL A. COHENJULY 9, 2014
Its been a pretty good couple of weeks for American foreign policy. No, seriously.
On June 23, the last of Syrias chemical weapons stockpile was loaded onto a Danish freighter to be destroyed. The following day, President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia asked his Parliament to rescind the permission that it had given him to send troops into Ukraine. Meanwhile, there is still cautious optimism that a nuclear deal with Iran is within reach.
What do these have in common? They were achieved without a single American bomb being dropped and they relied on a combination of diplomacy, economic sanctions and the coercive threat of military force. As policy makers and pundits remain focused on Iraq and the perennial but distracting discussion about the use of force, these modest but significant achievements have, perhaps predictably, been ignored. Yet they hold important lessons for how American power can be most effectively deployed today.
Nine months ago, President Obama eschewed military means to punish Syria for its use of chemical weapons and instead negotiated an agreement to remove them. Critics like Senator John McCain blasted it as a loser deal that would never work. By refusing to back up a stated red line with military force, Mr. Obama had supposedly weakened American credibility.
In Damascus, however, the threat of military engagement by the United States was taken more seriously. And when given the choice between American bombing or giving up his chemical weapons, President Bashar al-Assad of Syria chose the latter.
more
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/07/10/opinion/obamas-understated-foreign-policy-gains.html?_r=0
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
9 replies, 1414 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (8)
ReplyReply to this post
9 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Obama’s Understated Foreign Policy Gains (Original Post)
flpoljunkie
Jul 2014
OP
While asking for no credit, ever. Notice that, they never ask for credit, they are mature men.
Fred Sanders
Jul 2014
#4
Understated as in little reported by the corporate media, it is getting pretty obvious the cabal
Fred Sanders
Jul 2014
#3
Sunlei
(22,651 posts)1. Love the way Pres. & VP work hard for us all
Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)4. While asking for no credit, ever. Notice that, they never ask for credit, they are mature men.
karynnj
(59,506 posts)7. As they are foreign policy gains, add the Secretary of State
who was a key player on all three of these goals --- and for brokering the deal in Afghanistan that may prevent a collapse of their government.
Sunlei
(22,651 posts)8. Yes, much respect & love to Mrs Clinton &
John Kerry. The Democratic Party and all the American people are fortunate to have so very many best of the best.
karynnj
(59,506 posts)9. Clinton had little to do with either the chemical weapons removal or Ukraine,
but she was there at the beginning of the opening to Iran, when Nicolas Burns, her deputy SoS was involved in the back channel talks. So, you are correct in adding her as well. (I hadn't thought of her because all three issues are recent accomplishments.)
bemildred
(90,061 posts)2. I concur, he may save the country yet. nt
Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)3. Understated as in little reported by the corporate media, it is getting pretty obvious the cabal
Last edited Sat Jul 12, 2014, 03:47 PM - Edit history (1)
will not let Obama have any credit, the negativity they project is sad and frightening.
Cosmocat
(14,575 posts)6. Corporate media is doing its job
breathlessly waiting to be led around by their noses by the republican noise machine ...
MisterP
(23,730 posts)5. fueling bloodthristy rebels for years is NOT "eschewed military means"