2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumSupreme Court allows Texas to use voter ID law (Under the cover of darkness)
The Supreme Court in a pre-dawn order Saturday said Texas could proceed with its strict voter ID law in next months election, despite a lower courts ruling that it was unconstitutional.
The court gave no reasoning for its decision, but Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg dissented, joined by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan.
The greatest threat to public confidence in elections in this case is the prospect of enforcing a purposefully discriminatory law, one that likely imposes an unconstitutional poll tax and risks denying the right to vote to hundreds of thousands of eligible voters, Ginsburg wrote.
An appeals court had said it was too close to the election to stop what has been described as the nations strictest photo ID law.
But Ginsburg said the court had shirked its duty, since a district court after a full trial had said the law was written with discriminatory intent and could keep an estimated 600,000 registered voters from casting ballots.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/courts_law/2014/10/18/0439b116-5623-11e4-892e-602188e70e9c_story.html?wpisrc=al_national
Prophet 451
(9,796 posts)Demographic changes were threatening to break the GOP's stranglehold on Texas but disenfranchising all the Democrats (let's not lie, that's exactly the intention) will keep the state under the Republican heel for another generation.
DhhD
(4,695 posts)while running for Governor of Texas. Many of these voters have valid registration cards and will be turned away at the voting booth not knowing when the came to vote, what this representative of Government has done to them and did not send them a notice about either. Abbott is hiding under a rock. (That's like a snake under a rock, in Texas talk.)
left-of-center2012
(34,195 posts)The conservative controlled Supreme Court is allowing voter discrimination.