Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

LiberalElite

(14,691 posts)
Sun Feb 1, 2015, 12:21 PM Feb 2015

NY Times: Blue Dot for Obama Prompts Red Nebraska to Revisit Electoral College Rules

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/02/01/us/politics/blue-dot-for-obama-prompts-red-nebraska-to-revisit-electoral-college-rules.html?rref=us&module=Ribbon&version=context®ion=Header&action=click&contentCollection=U.S.&pgtype=article

-snip-
LINCOLN, Neb. — If this state had an official color, it would most certainly be red. Football fans here don scarlet sweatshirts each game day, red meat is a dietary staple and, for decades, Republican presidential candidates filled Nebraska’s borders on the electoral map with their party’s hue.

But in 2008, a Nebraska quirk injected a drop of blue into that sea of red, in the form of a single, lonely electoral vote for the Democratic presidential candidate.

Nebraska is one of just two states, along with Maine, that do not award all their electoral voters to the statewide winner. And that meant that in 2008, Barack Obama picked up an electoral vote from the congressional district around Omaha, even as Senator John McCain trounced him across the rest of the state.

One electoral vote — out of five in Nebraska and 538 nationally — might seem trivial, but Republicans do not see it that way. It was the first time since Lyndon B. Johnson beat Barry Goldwater in 1964, when Mr. Obama was a toddler, that the state awarded any votes to a Democrat.
-snip-
6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
NY Times: Blue Dot for Obama Prompts Red Nebraska to Revisit Electoral College Rules (Original Post) LiberalElite Feb 2015 OP
They adopted the rule rogerashton Feb 2015 #1
Republicans keep pushing for apportionment of electoral votes in California merrily Feb 2015 #2
They push for it in blue states. Red states, not so much. Thor_MN Feb 2015 #3
Republicans win when they rig the game in their favor. blkmusclmachine Feb 2015 #4
I'd rather the whole country adopt Maine/Nebraska rules Telcontar Feb 2015 #5
Take a look at the current Congress, or even the last three.... lastlib Feb 2015 #6

rogerashton

(3,920 posts)
1. They adopted the rule
Sun Feb 1, 2015, 12:27 PM
Feb 2015

Giving one electoral vote to each congressional district thinking that it would favor the conservative rural districts. Numerically, it does -- one vote in the rural districts counts for more than one in Omaha. But they were foiled by their own Gerrymander tactics.

merrily

(45,251 posts)
2. Republicans keep pushing for apportionment of electoral votes in California
Sun Feb 1, 2015, 01:54 PM
Feb 2015

If that happens, we just might be cooked, unless we pick up Texas.

 

Telcontar

(660 posts)
5. I'd rather the whole country adopt Maine/Nebraska rules
Mon Feb 2, 2015, 09:37 AM
Feb 2015

Would make the election of Presidents at least a little closer to the actual will of the people.

lastlib

(23,336 posts)
6. Take a look at the current Congress, or even the last three....
Mon Feb 2, 2015, 12:03 PM
Feb 2015

and you'll be glad we don't do that. We'd be talking about President McCain and (God help us!) Vice-President Palin if we did. Granted, we would have been talking about President Gore after 2000 (what a refreshing thought! no SCOTUS selection!), but I think it's a double-edged sword that could cut us badly in the current environment.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»NY Times: Blue Dot for Ob...