Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

mahatmakanejeeves

(57,511 posts)
Fri Mar 13, 2015, 03:06 PM Mar 2015

Tom Cotton picked apart by Army general over ‘mutinous’ Iran letter

Tom Cotton picked apart by Army general over ‘mutinous’ Iran letter

PostPartisan
By Jonathan Capehart March 13 at 10:29 AM
@capehartj

The open letter to the leaders of the Islamic Republic of Iran signed by 47 senators and instigated by Sen. Tom Cotton (R-Ark.) was a stunning breach of protocol. One so outrageous that my former colleagues at the New York Daily News dubbed the signers “traitors.” While it is indeed a slap in the face of President Obama and an affront to the presidency, I’m not sure I would go that far, especially since Cotton is an Army veteran of the Iraq and Afghanistan wars. So, I turned to retired Major Gen. Paul D. Eaton for perspective. He wouldn’t say Cotton and Co. were “traitors,” either. He had a better word.

“I would use the word mutinous,” said Eaton, whose long career includes training Iraqi forces from 2003 to 2004. He is now a senior adviser to VoteVets.org. “I do not believe these senators were trying to sell out America. I do believe they defied the chain of command in what could be construed as an illegal act.” Eaton certainly had stern words for Cotton.

“What Senator Cotton did is a gross breach of discipline, and especially as a veteran of the Army, he should know better,” Eaton told me. “I have no issue with Senator Cotton, or others, voicing their opinion in opposition to any deal to halt Iran’s nuclear progress. Speaking out on these issues is clearly part of his job. But to directly engage a foreign entity, in this way, undermining the strategy and work of our diplomats and our Commander in Chief, strains the very discipline and structure that our foreign relations depend on, to succeed.” The consequences of Cotton’s missive were plainly apparent to Eaton. “The breach of discipline is extremely dangerous, because undermining our diplomatic efforts, at this moment, brings us another step closer to a very costly and perilous war with Iran,” he said.
47 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Tom Cotton picked apart by Army general over ‘mutinous’ Iran letter (Original Post) mahatmakanejeeves Mar 2015 OP
"gross breach of discipline" n/t handmade34 Mar 2015 #1
Those 47 should either resign or issue an apology. Treason, sedition, in violation of the Logan ... Botany Mar 2015 #2
Post removed Post removed Mar 2015 #46
".....that our foreign relations depend on, to succeed.” Turbineguy Mar 2015 #3
Yup, That is the Key Word alright. Add Bibi's congressional campaign photo op, misterhighwasted Mar 2015 #4
KICK!!!! calimary Mar 2015 #5
Is Cotton still active in the Military asiliveandbreathe Mar 2015 #6
I bet he is still a member in the IRR (independant ready reserve) Victor_c3 Mar 2015 #23
K & R SunSeeker Mar 2015 #7
SUCK on this, Tehran Tom! SoapBox Mar 2015 #8
I think Gen. Eaton pretty much summed up what it has come down to. Wash. state Desk Jet Mar 2015 #9
I wonder if Cotton is starting to realize yet...... dawnie51 Mar 2015 #10
Rightwingerdingers are NEVER wrong. OldRedneck Mar 2015 #12
The fox entertainment crowd kacekwl Mar 2015 #16
yeah........ BlancheSplanchnik Mar 2015 #20
Fuck his war service. BlueStater Mar 2015 #11
As a fellow veteran, I doubt the legitimacy of his war service Victor_c3 Mar 2015 #24
Big Dose of Reality Victor_c3. A sincere moment of silence for your memories here, and Thank You... misterhighwasted Mar 2015 #26
Didn't they used to hang mutineers? world wide wally Mar 2015 #13
State GOPs are brining back the firing squard and hangings Iliyah Mar 2015 #22
Who is his "adult" handler? realFedUp Mar 2015 #14
It kind of tells you what the "adults" think when the head of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee Victor_c3 Mar 2015 #25
The political higher ups who paid Cotton $900,000 in campaign money for his "other service"..to them misterhighwasted Mar 2015 #28
That's what I was looking for! Dustlawyer Mar 2015 #15
The Republicans believe their own propaganda. Enthusiast Mar 2015 #17
What the General said. leanforward Mar 2015 #18
Honestly, I doubt they were misled. hedda_foil Mar 2015 #47
Huge K & R !!! - Thank You !!! WillyT Mar 2015 #19
“The breach of discipline is extremely dangerous, because undermining our diplomatic efforts, at Cha Mar 2015 #21
And there it is Cha. That's it. misterhighwasted Mar 2015 #29
Cotton mouth Traitortot is the new neocon Rat pack rolled into one big ball. Cha Mar 2015 #30
Mutinous. The perfect word for it...K&R n/t ms liberty Mar 2015 #27
I totally agree! AwakeAtLast Mar 2015 #32
K&R DeSwiss Mar 2015 #31
Mutiny on the Tom Cotton Bounty lovemydog Mar 2015 #33
I've been waiting to hear from an honorable officer about Cotton--and Ernst Hekate Mar 2015 #34
JAG should be reviewing the actions of both Cotton & Ernst. misterhighwasted Mar 2015 #35
Cotton was honorably discharged sarge43 Mar 2015 #37
Yes I debated that same point, but was informed that misterhighwasted Mar 2015 #38
If so, things have changed since I certified 214s. sarge43 Mar 2015 #39
Correct on McCain. My concern is that none will be held misterhighwasted Mar 2015 #41
Couldn't agree more sarge43 Mar 2015 #42
Service doesn't excuse Cotton for sabotage Evar Mar 2015 #36
Rec'd sellitman Mar 2015 #40
Mutinous and and traitorous are synonymous enough to make the differences not matter. EOM Veilex Mar 2015 #43
Mutinous and and traitorous are synonymous enough to make the differences not matter. EOM Veilex Mar 2015 #43
Traitorous, uninformed and uncaring Repug conniving to make America look bad to the world, lark Mar 2015 #45

Botany

(70,521 posts)
2. Those 47 should either resign or issue an apology. Treason, sedition, in violation of the Logan ...
Fri Mar 13, 2015, 03:16 PM
Mar 2015

.... act, or a mutinous act I don't know which one applies but that letter and bringing in Bibi
were very acts by a group who see their #1 job as thwarting President Obama anytime and
anywhere they get the chance.

"If Republican senators want to make the point that an Iran deal requires a treaty, they should
make that case to the American people, not to the Iranians. Congress simply has no business
conducting foreign policy with a foreign government, especially an adversarial one."

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10026353858

Response to Botany (Reply #2)

Turbineguy

(37,346 posts)
3. ".....that our foreign relations depend on, to succeed.”
Fri Mar 13, 2015, 03:17 PM
Mar 2015

Succeed being the operative word. Opposite to Fail.

misterhighwasted

(9,148 posts)
4. Yup, That is the Key Word alright. Add Bibi's congressional campaign photo op,
Fri Mar 13, 2015, 03:24 PM
Mar 2015

and the picture completes itself.
They invited Bibi into sway his election then sent The Letter to encourage the failure of the delicate Iranian foreign relations talks.

Mutiny, is a milder word than I would use.

"Operative word... "
That is correct, good point!

asiliveandbreathe

(8,203 posts)
6. Is Cotton still active in the Military
Fri Mar 13, 2015, 04:05 PM
Mar 2015

in some capacity? - Is he retired? - is he a member of any Reserve? -- If he is, he needs to be put on notice and relieved of any military position he holds. And take Lindsey with him...


It is about time our Military commanders speak up and our vets for that matter - in what world do we put our men and women in harms way to score political points..or the AMERICAN people...SPEAK UP _ SPEAK OUT _ NO WAR!

Victor_c3

(3,557 posts)
23. I bet he is still a member in the IRR (independant ready reserve)
Fri Mar 13, 2015, 08:45 PM
Mar 2015

independent ready reserve.

Basically, that is a passive reserve. No drills, no meetings, you hardly even know you in it. It's in the fine print of your commission. Basically, after your 4 years of active duty time is up and you leave the army, they reserve the right to call you back to active duty for an additional 4 years.

I had a run-in with the IRR, which basically started the whole PTSD fiasco I've been dealing with for 10+ years (but that is another very long story, probably worthy of its own thread).

Wash. state Desk Jet

(3,426 posts)
9. I think Gen. Eaton pretty much summed up what it has come down to.
Fri Mar 13, 2015, 04:21 PM
Mar 2015

Mutineers by the way are notoriously known to commit treasonous acts. What this is now seems to stop short of treason. What becomes of what it is may not.

47 senators on the same page at the same time pens in hand ,signatures applied is not just a mistake.
The Strom coming is far far worse than that snow storm over Washington DC that maverick mutinous McCain claims they
all were in a hurry to run away from at the time of the signing. Short on time.

dawnie51

(959 posts)
10. I wonder if Cotton is starting to realize yet......
Fri Mar 13, 2015, 04:36 PM
Mar 2015

how badly he has fucked up. Or is the money from the MIC making him feel all better?

 

OldRedneck

(1,397 posts)
12. Rightwingerdingers are NEVER wrong.
Fri Mar 13, 2015, 04:48 PM
Mar 2015

It's the rest of us who don't recognize how brilliant they are -- that's why we think they are wrong.

I know -- I live across the road from a Tea Bagger. Talking with him is like talking to a brick wall. Only the brick wall is smarter.

kacekwl

(7,017 posts)
16. The fox entertainment crowd
Fri Mar 13, 2015, 06:00 PM
Mar 2015

and mouthpieces have not approved Maj. Gen. Eaton because he is the wrong kind of military man. Better to ask the "Man who killed Osama" or Ollie North.

BlueStater

(7,596 posts)
11. Fuck his war service.
Fri Mar 13, 2015, 04:46 PM
Mar 2015

Only thing it makes him, unlike so many of his Republican colleagues, is not a chickenhawk.

His actions as a senator make him a traitor. And that's what I'm going to call the asshole. Ollie North was a veteran too and he's still traitorous scum.

Victor_c3

(3,557 posts)
24. As a fellow veteran, I doubt the legitimacy of his war service
Fri Mar 13, 2015, 08:59 PM
Mar 2015

He was an Infantry Platoon Leader in 2007 if I recall correctly. I did the same job, but in 2004.

Given his stance and politics, I fail to believe that this guy really got intimate with combat on the same level that many other combat veterans do. I doubt he's stuffed a body bag with the body of a person that he shot or that he dealt with losing Soldiers under his command and their grieving families. Those sorts of images shock the urge to fight in a war right out of - quick.

I fail to accept that a fellow combat veteran who really experienced combat close and personally could be so callous as to want to push us towards yet another war in the Mideast.

--- edit to add---

Not all veterans are created equal. Some get more direct exposure to combat than others. it's one thing to drop a bomb from an airplane 30,000+ feet in the air and kill people that way and it's another thing to kill someone with your rifle and to see them drop right in front of you. Likewise, it adds a whole level of "reality" to the experience when you have to recover the body of the person you killed. You get to see right up close and personally what your weapon did to their body. You get to look at their gaping mouths and open blank eyes and you get to feel that pit in your soul that tells you that what you did was wrong no matter how much you try to justify why you shot that person as you stuff their meat into what is basically a black garbage bag.

Some veterans just sit on a base in an airconditioned office and have mortar rounds land a few hundred yards from them and that's the closest they get to combat.

misterhighwasted

(9,148 posts)
26. Big Dose of Reality Victor_c3. A sincere moment of silence for your memories here, and Thank You...
Fri Mar 13, 2015, 09:25 PM
Mar 2015

..for making your way to DU.

Kudos to you & speaking the truth about Mr Cotton.
Your input here is valuable.
Peace

realFedUp

(25,053 posts)
14. Who is his "adult" handler?
Fri Mar 13, 2015, 05:30 PM
Mar 2015

Surely a freshman needs to pass this shit to someone higher up? Look higher up for the same idiots in charge.

Victor_c3

(3,557 posts)
25. It kind of tells you what the "adults" think when the head of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee
Fri Mar 13, 2015, 09:11 PM
Mar 2015

(a republican) won't sign your letter. (republican Bob Corker from Tennessee)

misterhighwasted

(9,148 posts)
28. The political higher ups who paid Cotton $900,000 in campaign money for his "other service"..to them
Fri Mar 13, 2015, 09:31 PM
Mar 2015

Somewhere on DU yesterday was a post about who bought Mr Cotton.
They did belong to the Hard Right tho I don't recall who the Post stated, Adelson maybe & ??
Maybe someone else can locate this info

Dustlawyer

(10,495 posts)
15. That's what I was looking for!
Fri Mar 13, 2015, 05:52 PM
Mar 2015

He and the other 46 in effect, breached the chain of command! They did attempt to sabotage the President and the State Department.

leanforward

(1,076 posts)
18. What the General said.
Fri Mar 13, 2015, 06:24 PM
Mar 2015

Thank you sir. And it has been said the "senate is the greatest deliberative body in the world". Thanks for the comments. Where were the "wise ones"? Someone said this document was presented to the signing senators as they were headed out for a weekend or something like. Horses headed for the barn. This letter is a disaster, ala, the Air Florida disaster. Turn around, go back, don't sign it until . . . . They were mislead by a senator with little experience. But, had a million dollars from an Israelie PAC.

hedda_foil

(16,375 posts)
47. Honestly, I doubt they were misled.
Sat Mar 14, 2015, 05:03 PM
Mar 2015

Turtleman signed it, as did the rest of the highest levels of leadership. Former did the right thing, but it seems to me that this letter had to have had the blessings of the caucus to have gotten that many signatures. Otherwise, a very new freshman senator wouldn't have had that much buy in on such a major breach of Senate behavior. Adelson and company may have sponsored Cotton but the influence they exerted was most likely felt by his seniors.

Cha

(297,323 posts)
21. “The breach of discipline is extremely dangerous, because undermining our diplomatic efforts, at
Fri Mar 13, 2015, 07:47 PM
Mar 2015
this moment, brings us another step closer to a very costly and perilous war with Iran,” he said.

Which is exactly what they want.

Thank you, General Eaton! Thank you, mhmkj

misterhighwasted

(9,148 posts)
29. And there it is Cha. That's it.
Fri Mar 13, 2015, 09:34 PM
Mar 2015

Bush's Saudi pals invented a reason for war.
This is no different.
Cotton is the new GW.

 

DeSwiss

(27,137 posts)
31. K&R
Sat Mar 14, 2015, 12:03 AM
Mar 2015
“The breach of discipline is extremely dangerous, because undermining our diplomatic efforts, at this moment, brings us another step closer to a very costly and perilous war with Iran,” he said.


- Another war. That's exactly the point.

Hekate

(90,715 posts)
34. I've been waiting to hear from an honorable officer about Cotton--and Ernst
Sat Mar 14, 2015, 02:42 AM
Mar 2015

There should be consequences.

misterhighwasted

(9,148 posts)
35. JAG should be reviewing the actions of both Cotton & Ernst.
Sat Mar 14, 2015, 05:27 AM
Mar 2015

It may take awhile until the public is privy to any decisions if any at all.
Dont know how quickly they move on such subjects.

sarge43

(28,941 posts)
37. Cotton was honorably discharged
Sat Mar 14, 2015, 08:09 AM
Mar 2015

He is a civilian. The military has no authority over him.

Further, a reservist, retiree or guard cannot be activated solely for the purpose of investigation or punishment.

I am in no way defending what those creatures did, but the military cannot be given that authority over prior active duty service members.

misterhighwasted

(9,148 posts)
38. Yes I debated that same point, but was informed that
Sat Mar 14, 2015, 08:33 AM
Mar 2015

..following discharge one can still be called back for, I think 5 years, so Cotton would still need to keep his military reputation spotless during that time.
The person debating me on this point yesterday was also ex military & quite adamant.
Regardless, as an ex military Afghan Veteran, the person I spoke with was quite pissed about Cotton's disloyalty to his Country not to mention the Million dollar payoff he received prior.
I am not arguing here, am just going by what my friend stated with convincing certainty.
Perhaps he was referring to some technical code of conduct.





sarge43

(28,941 posts)
39. If so, things have changed since I certified 214s.
Sat Mar 14, 2015, 09:04 AM
Mar 2015

It's a binary: Discharged: No longer subject to military authority. Released from active duty: Reserve status of some type and subject (however unlikely) to recall to active duty.

Have to see Cotton's 214 to be sure. It may be a binary, but how it's determined can be complicated.

Again, it's a mute point and a good point. Do we want the military arresting legislators; that's a coup.

If anyone in that bunch should have known better and needs his ass kicked, it's McCain. Third generation navy, academy grad, 22 years active service, retiree. However, as many have allowed, he's probably flying with the flaps down now. Snow storm? -- please.

misterhighwasted

(9,148 posts)
41. Correct on McCain. My concern is that none will be held
Sat Mar 14, 2015, 09:57 AM
Mar 2015

..to any account in the end.
It will remain just one more issue to have total disgust for the GOP

Evar

(44 posts)
36. Service doesn't excuse Cotton for sabotage
Sat Mar 14, 2015, 06:26 AM
Mar 2015

While serving in Iraq and Afghanistan is admirable, that doesn't excuse Cotton for sabotage of the president's negotiations with Iran. Benedict Arnold was a general in the Revolution, but arrogance led to his downfall, too.

lark

(23,121 posts)
45. Traitorous, uninformed and uncaring Repug conniving to make America look bad to the world,
Sat Mar 14, 2015, 02:55 PM
Mar 2015

weaken this government and make themselves seem more important than they are. Yep, Cotton is a totally typical Repug and that's sad. The party of Lincoln has tumbled badly and is a disgusting mockery of an American political party when all they care about is enriching the 1% and themselves and hurting this government (not giving a damn about the people it hurts) because it's not giving them 100% of what they want quickly enough. Rabid dogs is too kind of a description for these perverse and hateful schemers and charlatans.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Tom Cotton picked apart b...