2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumI am anti-Hillary because I am anti-establishment.
She is pro-wall street and I am anti-wall street. She is pro-war and I am anti-war. She is wealthy and so supports the economic status quo; I am poor and so I support radical economic evolution. She is Ivy League and I am public school. For people like her, houses are investment vehicles; for people like me, a house is a home - and a 30 year debt obligation. She is a dominionist seeking more religion in the public sphere and I am an atheist who thinks prayer breakfasts with "the Family" are distasteful clique parties based in dangerous myth.
I don't hate Hillary and I am not bashing her. She is pro-establishment and stands for nearly everything I stand against; I intend to continue to participate in the conversation and hope the democrats can find a better candidate.
SamKnause
(13,108 posts)sufrommich
(22,871 posts)RadiationTherapy
(5,818 posts)on christian dominion over the god blessed usa. You hadn't heard?
JustAnotherGen
(31,828 posts)http://www.businessinsider.com/martin-omalley-is-wall-streets-public-enemy-number-one-2015-6
"Right now people on Wall Street are talking about Martin OMalley. Now does he have a chance to win? Im not a political guy, it would seem like odds are low based on everything that I know," Gasparino said, later adding, "What they're really worried about is not that he's going to win. Its that he's going to force [Clinton] so far to the left with that resonating message."
Gasparino said Wall Street fears this O'Malley effect could stop Clinton from doing "some of the things they want her to do like water down Dodd-Frank."
"They really think that if she gets in there, that if Hillary Clinton gets in there, that Dodd-Frank will be watered down to the point where they can do proprietary trading using their own capital to trade which is outlawed right now. And various aspects of Dodd-Frank will be freed up so the banks can go back to making a lot of money," Gasparino explained. "Not that they don't make a lot of money now, but even more money, Clinton-era money."
upaloopa
(11,417 posts)good things for you know matter what you think of her because she cares about you whether you know it or care. That's why she is running. Some day you will see too.
Just saving your ass from the right wing ideology should be enough.
RadiationTherapy
(5,818 posts)Jeez, that is creepy and condescending and presumptuous, but I don't mind. I am financially desperate enough to need whatever crumbs may shake my way from the aristocrat class, but I can no longer vocally or bodily support this nonsense. I am very tired of the wealth game.
""Lannister, Baratheon, Stark, Tyrell, they're all just spokes on a wheel. This one's on top and that one's on top and on and on it spins, crushing those on the ground."
JustAnotherGen
(31,828 posts)"Well, Ive got news for the bullies of Wall Street: The presidency is not a crown to be passed back and forth by you between two royal families. It is a sacred trust, to be earned from the American people, and exercised on behalf of the people of these United States."
O'Malley's populist ire wasn't limited to Goldman Sachs. In his announcement speech, he focused on income inequality, which he described as a situation wherein "Main Street struggles, while Wall Street soars."
He accused the "privileged and the powerful" of having been "the ones who turned our economy upside down in the first place" and lamented the fact "not a single Wall Street CEO was convicted to a crime related to the 2008 economic meltdown."
Psssst - on a side note - I heard the Dos Equis Man - aka the most interesting man alive - calls Martin O'Malley sir.
RadiationTherapy
(5,818 posts)to the left of the Establishment's nominee.