2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumExplosion of Support Groups For Bernie Among Minorities Across Social Media.
Looking back to Jan of this year, Bernie was virtually unknown to Whites, Latinos, Blacks, Asians, Muslims and in fact he was at 3% among ALL Americans just months ago.
That was going to be his biggest challenge when he decided to run for the Presidency.
Hillary otoh, was a household name, which is to be expected. She was First Lady of the US and then Senator from NY. ran for the office in 2008 and was then SOS under Obama.
So for Bernie's campaign the first hurdle to overcome was getting his name out there to the overwhelming majority of Americans who had no idea who he was, what he stood for and probably had no idea of which state he was from.
So, the campaign decided on a strategy. First to focus on the critical, though small states. Score some victories there, gain some media attention from that, hoping to increase his name recognition.
Clearly the strategy is working, because people are now not just finding out about his campaign, but are so supportive of it that they are forming groups all over the country to help him form the Political Revolution they know is needed right now.
One other important tool to get the word out, was the very powerful New Media which is where people from across the country get their news now.
His name recognition has improved, though nowhere near where it needs to be yet.
I see some 'concern' from a few people about ONE GROUP among all the minorities and in fact Whites who did not know Bernie.
This seems odd to me since imo, Bernie needs to 'reach out ' TO ALL AMERICANS and he is doing just that.
However, to set the minds of those who appear to think that only African Americans are not likely to find out about Bernie on their own, at rest, not to worry, AAs, Latinos, just like Whites ARE finding out about him, the same way, from the sources and are JOINING his Political Revolution along with every other American.
Some of the groups that have formed within the past few weeks are:
@POCForBernie who have established a FB and Twitter account joining the campaign to do what Whites are doing, get his name known to All Americans. Some of the work they are doing since their launch is to make sure people know about Bernie's 'incredible history of fighting for Civil Rights for ALL Americans by posting it on their websites, informing people about WHO he is. This is now posted on @POCForBernie's twitter acct eg.
So as you can see, people are taking the lead themselves because they understand the daunting task it will be for Bernie to reach ALL Americans.
@LGBTForBernie, again, taking the initiative themselves to make sure all Americans know about the man they support for POTUS
@LatinosForBernie, doing what all Americans who support Bernie are doing, working with the campaign now to overcome the huge task of getting his name out there because, they believe, once people KNOW him, they will support him.
@BlacksForBernie, joining Bernie's Political Revolution, not waiting for anyone to 'reach out' to them because they KNOW Bernie's history of fighting for their Civil Rights from BEFORE he entered Politics.
I am puzzled by the singling out of ONLY AAs who are as capable as any other group of following this election and deciding who best represents them. AND taking action without anyone holding their hands.
There are dozens of other minority groups forming every day.
So to those who are worried that only ONE group might need someone to hold their hands, rest assured, they do NOT.
Americans KNOW something is terribly wrong in this country.
Now many have found a candidate who is speaking to THEM and highlighting the ISSUES that concern THEM, not engaging in the dirty tricks and negative campaigning Americans are so sick and tired of, but focusing on the ISSUES.
And they are not waiting for the campaign to organize them, they are doing it themselves, because they understand what Bernie means about not being able to do it alone, that it will take a 'Political Movement' and they GET THAT.
So please do not single out any group of people and assume they, more than any other group, need to have the way pointed out to them. That is pretty insulting imho.
No American who has watched the downward trajectory of this nation in so many areas needs their hands held when they finally see someone who is willing to stand up for them and fight for them and who has done so for decades.
They know exactly what to do AND they are doing it. This, after all, is THEIR COUNTRY!
It is rather demeaning imo, to assume that just one group is incapable of doing what every other group is doing so I would like to put that to rest if possible. There is absolutely NO NEED TO WORRY about that.
The Bernie Sanders Campaign plans to reach out to All Americans, their strategy of gaining some name recognition AND SUCCESS to begin with, has worked.
This has led Americans to take matters into their own hands and help the Campaign by forming their own groups all over the country to spread the word!
If anyone wants to help any of these groups, some are asking for help eg, people to provide content for their online accounts, to help forward the message by adding their groups names to their own FB and Twitter accts etc.
It is very exciting to watch this Campaign grow from where it was on the day Bernie Announced to where it is now.
From 3% all the way to being neck and neck with the Front Runner in the states where he has focused his campaign up to now, in less than two months.
And that is due mainly to the massive army of volunteers who have helped spread the word and of course to his campaign managagement.
And once again, that army of campaigners includes ALL Americans.
daleanime
(17,796 posts)sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)Americans find out about Bernie. I am amazed at how fast it is happening, in less than 2 months!
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)Just 1 week ago he was a virtual unknown among black voters, and now there's an EXPLOSION!
Feel the Bern!
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)needed to be led to his campaign, was pretty insulting imo.
It took a while to get the word out across the country that Bernie was even running in this campaign.
Whites knew nothing about about him other than in his own state, then we political junkies who are tuned in to these things, found out he might run and began to have hope that it might happen.
AAs are no more uninformed about his campaign than anyone else and now they are finding out, as you can see, like everyone else they are spreading the word.
appalachiablue
(41,171 posts)The Video by the young man who points out the candidates positions so well and gets right to the heart. Amazing-
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)here a few days ago http://www.democraticunderground.com/128016210
I think that kid has a future in politics.
Glad to see he is getting a lot of attention. I think he's probably too young to vote, but he sure is doing a great job educating people on the issues AND Bernie.
I posted a link to some of his other videos in that OP which was supplied by hedda_foil. Still in awe of how much knows about all the issues.
Rockyj
(538 posts)And Bernie is becoming well know with Native Americans!
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)But I am so impressed with those who are not waiting for him to get to every individual and group himself, because it would be virtually impossible and he doesn't have the money to make it happen.
They are helping him now by reaching out to their own communities on his behalf. It is a true grass roots effort.
I am glad to learn that he is becoming known to Native Americans also. I have a feeling once he is heard that his support will grow. How could it not? He has fought so hard for equality for all Americans when it wasn't 'cool' to do so.
Thank you for your comment, it is great to know he is reaching more people even without all that corporate money.
Number23
(24,544 posts)He may very well get there. But he ain't nowhere there yet.
BainsBane
(53,066 posts)2032.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)ago, now they have over 4000. It's called 'campaigning which is what the AA groups are doing right now. The more successful they are the more followers they will get THAT IS THEIR PURPOSE in setting up their accounts.
You seem to want AAs to fail or am I misunderstanding your comment. There are more than those two groups, and check back in a month and see how this works. Or don't.
I hope they get what they want, they certainly are working hard to get their candidate who represents their interests, elected. They will get lots of help as they are supporting a candidate who has literally an army of supporters doing what they are doing, getting the word out. Not to mention all the FB pages I didn't bother to list.
Sorry to disappoint you, but they are going to grow and grow like all the other groups who started before them.
You seem so intensely 'concerned' about Bernie's supporters and almost angry at them for some reason. That's too bad really, I can't imagine being that invested in wanting other people to fail, why so focused on AAs? Seems very odd to me.
sheshe2
(83,898 posts)Number23. It is an explosion!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)believe best represents them? Really? How sad. I wish them great success in their campaigning for Bernie.
Why so concerned about this one group of people? Many people have noticed the offensive suggestions that AAs out all the many groups of people you all seem to believe could not do what they obviously can do.
Any 'concerns' about Bernie 'not reaching out to Asian Americans'??? Or Chinese Americans? Why not? He isn't doing that, how about Jewish Americans? You would think he would be reaching out to all these groups, and that YOU would be as 'concerned' that he is not as you are about AAs.
Is it that you believe all those other groups don't need anyone to hold their hands? That is how it comes across just so you know, to many, many people and is extremely offensive to single out any group that way. Are you aware of the many AAs on this site who do not identify themselves as such? Think about that for a while.
Response to sabrina 1 (Reply #87)
Post removed
demwing
(16,916 posts)AUTOMATED MESSAGE: Results of your Jury Service
On Thu Jul 2, 2015, 06:29 AM an alert was sent on the following post:
Sabrina. http://www.democraticunderground
REASON FOR ALERT
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.
ALERTER'S COMMENTS
'You think about the AA's you are running off this board.'
Accusing a long-term DUer like Sabrina of running African American DUers away is nasty and strongly implies that Sabrina's a racist. This is ugly stuff and should be hidden.
JURY RESULTS
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Thu Jul 2, 2015, 06:38 AM, and the Jury voted 4-3 to HIDE IT.
Juror #1 voted to HIDE IT Explanation: Looking at the whole exchange in context leads me to the conclusion that the alerted post is unhinged and over the top hostile. I think one of her earlier posts should be hidden as well.
Juror #2 voted to HIDE IT Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE Explanation: Alerter: long-term means nothing. Ugly stuff should be hidden but this post is not it. This is truth. Why is it that the ones always whining about alert-stalking are the ones alert-stalking?
Juror #4 voted to HIDE IT Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #5 voted to HIDE IT Explanation: race baiting nonsense
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE Explanation: Well, I'm not sure I would say that it is "OK," but -- the post is confrontational, but the basis of the alert is contrived and I think to post is within reasonable limits.
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE Explanation: No explanation given
Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.
marym625
(17,997 posts)Quite an accusation. Especially considering one of the two that said they were leaving, or at least taking a break, is a Sanders supporter.
Thanks for the jury results. Very interesting. It seems that with some people, and I don't mean just here, that if you are a Sanders supporter you are not really a Democrat. Sad state of affairs when what we all claim to value most is the same as a candidate, that has fought for those same things, for longer than anyone currently sitting in the Senate, unwavering support for equality in action, votes, bills introduced and walking the walk, is so vilified. Just makes absolutely zero sense.
sufrommich
(22,871 posts)hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)BrotherIvan
(9,126 posts)It's always so odd when people say they don't see attacks from HRC supporters in threads. Well, there is a fine example. I don't think it should have been hidden; the post should have been called out for being totally untrue and manipulative, which it is.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)BrotherIvan
(9,126 posts)Atwater?
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)BrotherIvan
(9,126 posts)I don't see anyone calling her Atwater.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)The hosts felt the need to ban the poster.
BrotherIvan
(9,126 posts)I guess we can't discuss this honestly, so I will respect the civility you show most people here and return it to you. I very much respect that.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)So sorry.
demwing
(16,916 posts)and the hide was warranted on this nonsense comment: "think about the AA's you are running off this board"
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)a hard time. Several AA members have left due to the hatred towards Obama here and one is taking a break because he got two bogus hides for questioning Sanders.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)good democrats who are accused 'hating Obama' simply for disagreeing on Policy, The internet is a lot bigger now than it used to be where people can disagree with a politician without being accused of hatred. So thankfully we can still communicate with the many many great DUers who don't have the time to bother with such personal attacks. And work for the candidate they support without being subjected to constant attacks.
Personally I don't much care about personal attacks, I am pretty immune so they are wasted on me, I prefer to use them when they occur to demonstrate all that is wrong with our political system. Not into alerting or hiding much, I prefer to talk about ISSUES but will NOT stand by and watch the attempts to smear a good candidate with false claims.
If that bothers anyone, so be it. Facts are facts and I will post them here, or anywhere else it is needed.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)poster cannot respond.
randys1
(16,286 posts)but trying to make it better and NOT at the expense of anyone else.
That is who Bernie really is, which is why I support him.
Much work to be done on his team's part, of which I am part.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)He knows he can't reach everyone, so he needs all those who have discovered him and who support and respect him, to do what these people are doing.
Over the past couple of weeks, there HAS been an EXPLOSION of people from across the political spectrum, who having heard Bernie realize he speaks for them, smart enough to get that he doesn't have the big Corporate dollars to hire people to get his message out there, and taking matters into their own hands and using the tools available to THEM to spread the word to their own communities.
To mock those efforts is very wrong. Eg, the links I provided are just a small sampling of the literal army of people who are starting accounts to promote the candidate they believe represents them.
I would have thought that at the very least there would be approval by those who claimed to be 'concerned' that Bernie wasn't reaching these communities to see that they are doing it themselves FOR HIM.
Instead it is sad to see quite the opposite reaction, leading me to the conclusion that there was no real concern, confirming what many have surmised.
Number23
(24,544 posts)hundred followers somehow implies that the work has "been done" is not something that I would expect that you, a Bernie supporter who really is interested and committed to minority issues and social justice, would have to resort to.
Much work to be done on his team's part, of which I am part.
And he is damn lucky to have you.
randys1
(16,286 posts)to address that otherwise he will struggle with Hillary.
I honest to god believe that Bernie is the best choice, that Hillary would be FAR better than the alternative, but that Bernie is the best choice.
HOWEVER, I say that being a WHITE privileged, middle class non Jewish male, i.e. the most privileged class on the planet.
So I worry that people in my category will forget how little they know about most everything else, myself included.
You see, for a white male in America to tell a Black anybody in America that their needs have been addressed, is absurd.
Same as if I told Women their needs are addressed.
I believe Bernie cares about minorities and Women, big time. But I can AFFORD to believe that without knowing it for sure.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)thousands of volunteers with more joining every day who actually DO support him and are stepping in to bridge the MONEY gap working hard to make sure he gets the reach he needs to let as many people as possible know who he is.
I posted some samples to assure those expressing 'concern' about just one group, that that particular group is actively jumping into the campaign to respond to the call for help in getting his name out there.
They were MOCKED in this thread. That is too bad but it confirms what so many people had already surmised.
As for 'believing' that Bernie supports minorities and women, I don't 'believe' it, I never accept faith in a candidate without absolute proof, not since the last time I made that mistake. I don't have to 'believe' it in his case. He has one of the best records of anyone, in this race or not, on Civil Rights, and it is that fact that is attracting more and more people who themselves have been denied Civil Rights, to his campaign.
And each day there are more, proof that the army of volunteers he has attracted are doing a great job so far.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)claiming they need their hands held is extremely offensive to that group. As many have and are saying. This tactic has already backfired so it would be best for Hillary if her supporters stopped insulting voters who she is likely to need herself.
She already has problems with the AA community. Many have expressed anger at her due to her lack of knowledge, evidenced by the remark she made in a Black Church, of the fact that there is now a strong movement, Black Lives Matter, formed due to the killing by cops of young African American men.
If I were a Hillary supporter I would not be spending my time being 'concerned' about a candidate I do not support, I would be trying to mend fences with voters she is likely to lose herself.
Which leads me to wonder, why are her supporters not helping her instead of attacking another candidate? That certainly won't help their candidate.
I think Hillary needs to reach out to the AA community and apologize for offending them. That would be my advice if I were to actually be 'concerned' about a candidate I am not supporting.
Instead I spend my time promoting my candidate which makes a lot more sense to me.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)SoapBox
(18,791 posts)Bouncing for Bernie!
BrotherIvan
(9,126 posts)There are many PoC, women, LGBT, vets, and other posters on DU that keep trying to say over and over that those who claim to speak for them don't. And yet, they are used for "research" and as props to prove that neoliberalism is in fact the order of the day. It is downright Orwellian.
I will say it again that talking about economics in a speech does not in fact mean you do not care about social issues. Economic policy is the direct purview of the government and one of the most direct ways the executive branch can effect people's lives.
Jobs, healthcare & education--every person, regardless of income race, gender or sexual orientation deserves these things. How can we ignore that 37.9% of black children and 33.8% of Hispanic children are living in poverty?? Below a poverty line that we know is far too low. Who here thinks that is acceptable? Because they're not as poor as in Africa? How about the staggering black unemployment rate, especially the young people in depressed communities? Cursory support of the minimum wage when there are NO JOBS is just a smack in the face. People are struggling, tired and hungry. How come we can't fucking talk about it??
The executive does not have control over the Judicial Branch other than appointing justices. And how many times have we heard that the executive has no control over the Legislative Branch either? So what really is the point here? It remains to be seen whether the DoJ who does report to the president has any control over local police departments and state prosecutors. So far, the DoJ has mostly stayed on the sidelines of the murders.
The president of the united states has no more power over people to stop thinking racist thoughts or doing racist things or a woman clutching her purse when a I walk by at night. That is cultural racism and has to be attacked from a different angle such as education and social programs. What is illegal and can be more strongly enforced is discrimination in housing and jobs and we now have a decision of the Supreme Court to back that up. Voting rights, let's work on those. Let's work on restricting funding for states and police departments that hire racist cops. Let's figure out all the ways that are possible to change things and then let's go demand that our local, state, and federal politicians do something about it. But that's not the point of this exercise, is it?
I have no idea why one candidate has been singled out for this ire when the other two main Democratic candidates have abysmal records on some of these issues. Well, yes, I do.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)without the power needed to stand up and be counted. Bernie KNOWS this, so do Black Leaders, see MLK, Jesse Jackson especially in his second campaign where he made it an issue.
And btw, Bernie and Hightower as Jackson stated 'were the only two White Legislators who stood up for me when it was needed'.
The attempts by a few here to discredit Bernie's beyond par record on Civil Rights is a ROVIAN tactic. 'Attack the STRENGTHS of your opponent, not their weaknesses' and whether they realize or not, this IS a tactic and it is about to FAIL SPECTACULARLY as AAS SPEAK FOR THEMSELVES.
The minorities who are now organizing FOR Bernie, are excited about him FOR has focus on Economic Justice. THIS is what most are saying appeals to them.
I have seen comments THANKING HIM for this.
So ignore those who are using a very nasty and FAILED tactic to try to prevent people from supporting him. It isn't going to work as Minorities KNOW what is wrong and KNOW who is speaking for them. Not some anonymous posters on the internet with nothing to offer other than try to silence the one person who has fought for decades for Civil Rights.
They will be met with an army of supporters telling the TRUTH and will find themselves overwhelmed and discredited themselves for their what appears to most people now, as feigned 'concern' where it is not needed at all.
whathehell
(29,090 posts)Progress in social issues is great, but as the Reverend Al Sharpton said in his Presidential race of 2004:
"It's not who you go to bed with at night, but whether you have a job to go to in the morning".
He is totally correct!
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)people seem to want to DEPRIVE the AA community of accessing the same Economic Opportunities everyone else wants to have.
The cop killers are not murdering WEALTHY AAs, they are killing the poor, the disenfranchized and have been getting away with it for so long because they could.
Bernie is absolutely correct and I know that most thinking people are with him on this.
whathehell
(29,090 posts)They don't cost them anything. .
BrotherIvan
(9,126 posts)They love it even more when neoliberals fight the progressive wing. It means they don't have to lift a finger.
whathehell
(29,090 posts)People really need to wise up.
The Bernie surge suggests to me they may finally
be doing so...Let's hope.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)standing up for the candidate THEY choose, not the ones chosen for them.
THAT is why we are seeing so much effort to try to undermine Bernie. But look what happens, the more they attempt to smear him, the more people roll their eyes and think, 'not THIS again'.
And the more popular he becomes.
I am making a list of the attempted and now failed smears because as each one fails, we know there are think tanks busy working on another and we will be prepared to turn them back on those who attempt to do what they have in the past done to prevent the people from getting what they deserve and what Bernie is giving them, a campaign BASED ON THE ISSUES.
He has an literal army of volunteers now, growing every day, ready to take on the smear merchants and doing so very effectively.
As Bernie says 'enough is enough' and the people ARE ANGRY something the out of touch 'experts' have not yet understood. Their attempted smears only make people MORE angry because we deserve better, much better and we are sick to death of dirty politics, especially of the money that pays for it.
BrotherIvan
(9,126 posts)I think everyone has a right to speak their personal truth. I will listen to those who have standing to make these arguments, but I will not listen to their "allies" who are using it for their own ends. But perhaps some people do not quite encounter the reality every day because of their economic status.
I was the same a little bit. I grew up middle class in a family that prized education above all else. And I was lucky enough to receive a top grade education. So even though my industry was decimated and I have had to find another career, I know I will always be ok.
It wasn't until I taught in the next town over that I saw the reality of the poor and working classes. I taught in a high school where kids had no hope and no future. There were no jobs and they couldn't afford college. They were living in one bedroom apartments with 12 people. Their parents were gone all day long at work if they had jobs. They were being robbed and abused by their employers. The only meal some of them ate was free lunch and chips from the vending machine and whatever some of the teachers brought from school. I have talked at length about this experience on DU, but I have to say it profoundly changed my outlook. I wish everyone could have the same experience so then maybe we could come together and change this awful reality. This isn't an outlier, this is a huge chunk of the community.
This is happening all over our country, the richest country on earth. It is happening in Ferguson, Baltimore, the South Side, from coast to coast. If "Democrats" feel that these issues are unimportant and that Oprah being followed in a boutique in Switzerland is the most pressing issue, then neoliberalism will continue its destruction and we all have no one to blame but ourselves.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)told incredibly 'that won't cure racism'. Well really? Who knew? Money doesn't cure many things, but it sure would help those families you have talked about to be safer, to have some hope of a chance in life, to have some POWER, just like everyone else.
The USING of AAs in this election as a mere tool for political purposes is sickening frankly.
I know they will speak for themselves in this campaign, and as I demonstrated in this OP, already are.
But it is a shame that the ONLY interest some people have in minorities AND women (they usual groups used for political purposes) is to try to score points for their candidate. And that is shameful.
I know many families, Black and White who can't tell where their next meal is coming from because they have no access to a decent living. What that does to a person is so debilitating that it's hard to explain to those whose lives have always been comfortable.
I'm with Bernie on this, let's get ECONOMIC JUSTICE for ALL Americans. Enough is enough. No one should be living in the substandard conditions you are talking about in a country as wealthy as this.
But they are. And they are being kept from accessing what is their right by those who have no interest in seeing it happen for whatever reason.
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)African-Americans and people of color are followed in stores because of their race. But their race gets them followed because they are viewed as likely to be poor and desperate because of their race.
There is a very definite perception of poverty associated with the appearance of a person of color whether black or Hispanic or Asian.
marym625
(17,997 posts)I'm assuming the south side is Chicago? I just wanted to make sure no one else has our south side. It is ours, dsmn it!
BrotherIvan
(9,126 posts)I haven't been there but I have seen how economically depressed it is. Interestingly enough, the city where I taught, which was once higher than Chicago for murders, has improved and is having a rebirth which is great to watch. I also just watched a documentary about backyard fighting in Florida called Dawg Fight. This is another community with over a third unemployment and it looked very run down and depressing. I'm very shocked by the Marie Antoinette attitude on DU, but there it is.
marym625
(17,997 posts)My mom taught on the south side. A 5'2" white woman. All the students just loved her. When they were on strike one year back in the 70s my mom said to a reporter that there should be a moratorium on the current educational system that is passing kids that haven't earned it. That the ptb were forcing teachers not to teach, that lower grade classrooms were so full that those teachers had no time to do anything but babysit. So by the time they got to high school, the kids hadn't learned what they needed to know and then the administration forced the teachers to pass kids that didn't know 6th grade English. (She said it much better and much shorter though )
The Chicago Tribune ran the headline "Teacher says there should be a moratorium on education. "
Oy vey!
BrotherIvan
(9,126 posts)She taught primary school in this same town for forty years. The neighborhood peaked violence in the 90s during the gang wars. She was tough as hell but the kids ended up liking her because she also cared about them and wanted them to have a good education. She was always doing extra curricular stuff with them like science fair and plays and sports leagues because the school couldn't afford any of that. It was the era before testing, before teachers were beat to shit. My mom, who was also a white lady, was infamous for walking up to the front door of the biggest gang leader in town and telling him his son needed to stop skipping school. The guy looked like he was gonna punch her, then he said, "Ok, Teacher, he'll be there every day." And he was. And the boy grew up and came back to show off his young family and said he was working his way up to managing a company. My mom had a lot of students who came back to thank her. Every time I visited her in her classroom, there was a line of kids coming to visit. No lie.
I could tell a million stories of her students and my students, some good, some very sad. But I do know that people in these neighborhoods are being oppressed, not in an abstract way. It is systematic and self-fulfilling.
So do I think that having good jobs and access to education will help to change things at their very core? Yes, yes I do.
marym625
(17,997 posts)My brother from the same mother She did exactly the same thing. Gang members, in high school, in Chicago and they respected her, even when she was in their faces.
Damn straight it will change everything. But as long as there's money in elections, there will be no change.
No child left behind, which Clinton supported, has actually left almost every child in the dust
Bonobo
(29,257 posts)sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)themselves as such who I know are extremely offended by the singling out of and USE of AAs here for political purposes. I'm sure that would come as a surprise to those who claim to speak for ALL POC here. Same thing happens with women, a small group here claimed to speak for ALL women when in reality they speak only for a very few.
Paternalism IS a good for what they do.
I wonder too why this candidate who has done more for Civil Rights than all of the others put together. Which is why it is such a failed tactic so you wonder, 'what is behind it'?
You are correct, the point is not real 'concern' for women or minorities, so what is it? I know women and minorities have been political tools for a long time, but those days are over we women are NOT fooled by the pretend 'caring' that seems to occur ONLY during elections.
AAs I know are not fooled either. I could post some comments from AAs that would shock those here who claim to speak for them. They are WELL aware of being used this way and deeply resent it.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)Interesting!
BrotherIvan
(9,126 posts)sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)thread for your answer. Try to acknowledge those who are here speaking for themselves.
I speak for me only and resent the use of women for political purposes. That got old long ago so I understand those who feel the same way and are making it clear they need no hand holding by anyone.
Btw, on which ISSUES do you disagree with Bernie Sanders? His support for Civil Rights? Unions? Veterans? His opposition to job killilng TPP? What is it that you disagree with?
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)I just thought it was an.... interesting way to phrase it.
Kinda patronizing.
Aerows
(39,961 posts)guidance.
I don't go to a voting booth without being convinced as to why I should vote for one person vs. another, so yeah, that's called politics.
Do you run to a voting booth and randomly pull the lever for who knows what?
You are a smart individual based upon your posts here, so I'm going to go with "No, I don't just pull the lever randomly and without consideration."
BrotherIvan
(9,126 posts)The usual suspects just can't help themselves. I see the LGBT community speaking up and hitting back because all these SAME people who used to accuse people fighting for their rights as wanting a pink pony are now the first to draw the "AA forum" card.
THE SAME PEOPLE. The funny thing is, I'm pretty sure everyone knows who the biggest manipulators are. And their shit is wearing very thin. They always have some kind of giant, revealing, left-hating post and then the game is up. Most of the "stealth" Bernie supporters have also revealed themselves (but won't admit it) which makes me wonder just who would actually fein supporting a candidate and why? SMH. And apparently, it's been going on on other boards like kos as well which makes me wonder if this was driven by the campaign. I see people mention it just like DU.
Whatever, they are fooling nobody except those who share their own confimation bias.
Aerows
(39,961 posts)"You dumb childish people don't realize that Bernie Sanders can't win and you are inhibiting our inevitable President Clinton from taking the oath of office, you worthless heathens."
That isn't paternal, is it?
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)something one of those expensive think tanks came up with. And yes, they have revealed themselves as it's pretty obvious. Real honesty and sincerity are qualities that cannot be feigned. It's just impossible to feign those qualities. It's a bad tactic because you have no choice but to reveal yourself since the whole purpose is to 'attack, subtly and with 'concern' they think, from the 'inside'. Lol, and when they join in the spreading of the latest 'concern' it leaves no doubt.
Who would do that? Good question, but I have a few theories. It's not succeeding on forums either. I wonder why they don't just promote their own candidate, talk about the issues, try to get people on board. What I don't understand is what exactly all these 'tactics' are supposed to for THEIR candidate?
Your first two paragraphs are spot on. Most DUers are on to them.
BrotherIvan
(9,126 posts)I guess all these people just spontaneously decided to pretend to support Sanders so they can become hosts of groups or part of protected groups and then spread concern trolling. There are a few left who were craftier than the others who flamed out. The whole thing is the stupidest thing I've ever seen on the internet I think. Some people have way too much time.
marym625
(17,997 posts)I've been saying repeatedly that the economics that are intrinsically woven into the fabric of social justice is the money in politics.
As you so eloquently stated, we cannot change the thoughts of anyone. We can try but it doesn't always succeed and it usually takes a great deal of time.
However, laws can be changed. Laws can be enacted. Laws can be enforced. And laws can be shut down completely. None of those things will happen with politicians in the pockets of the corporations that gain so much from people being oppressed. To not see the connection between privatized prisons and other things that should be government run and never done for profit, and laws that allow for such blatant racism, or that are never enforced, you have to be blind, deaf and dumb and stupid.
Obviously, the social programs need politicians that care more about people than money. Women need politicians that will stop screwing with Roe v Wade and so many other things. As long as there is anything other than public funding of elections, it will never happen.
A free college education and a much higher minimum wage are important things to bring people out of poverty. But without laws, programs etc to bring social justice and equality, nothing will change
BrotherIvan
(9,126 posts)Why can't we talk about that? Instead we just have infighting and "allies" on this very thread trying to stir the shit. Or scream who is more racist. It's crazy and it does nobody any good.
How come we can't talk about the fact that the entire police and justice system funds itself on the backs of black and brown people. Remember when NYC cops decided to stop arresting people and crime didn't explode? Why didn't we take that bull by the horns and start something? Why can't we talk about that?
Or another DU poster and I were talking about education about slavery and programs to stop generational racism and she said brilliantly, "They should teach slavery like the Holocaust." Because people are being educated that slavery was all Gone with the Wind and that black people are making a big deal out of nothing. We should be teaching slavery as its own course, as part of our history and as a way to end racism in this country. How come we can't talk about that?
Like I said, I know why we can't talk about it. It's because we are flooded with memes and snipes and false divisions of social vs economic justice fueled by our wealthy posters. Now, even though there are African Americans who support Bernie on this board, we are treated to the new meme that Bernie supporters are "driving off AAs." Dear Lord, make it stop.
marym625
(17,997 posts)I find it really weird that the black people here on DU that support Sanders are being called out as if they're traitors. That one of the people who stated he needs a break is being used as an example of how Sanders supporters drove him away, when he himself supports Sanders. It's baffling to me.
I would love to talk about everything you said. I would especially love to talk about it with you. I know we'll agree so that will make it an easy conversation I would gladly talk to others that wouldn't agree, as long as it's people that can discuss and not threaten or make false accusations.
BrotherIvan
(9,126 posts)I would like that group. I don't expect people to agree, but the snipers are detrimental to any and all discussion and make a JOKE of DU. This social vs economic justice division is happening NOWHERE else on the web. It's funny, I see people trying to mimic the same talking points on articles at places like Huffpo: gun nut, doesn't care about AAs. I mean, so identical in use of words and phrases, I think they must be DU people. But the funny thing is, they make you post by your facebook profile and so you see who the people are and they always fit the same age, race, and gender. Check it out, it's very revealing. The Berniemania story last night has exactly what I'm talking about. Didn't work there either. I wonder when people will figure it out.
marym625
(17,997 posts)I seldom pay attention to comments on posts like that.
Maybe we should ask for a safe haven group here to discuss race? Put together a different SoP and ToS. Absolutely zero snark allowed. Not to censor but to immediately shut down anything that isn't causing good discussion.
What do you think?
Aerows
(39,961 posts)You laid it on the line. Anybody that doesn't get what you are saying benefits from NOT WANTING to get what you said.
You explained how the cow ate the cabbage with that post.
(I'm a Southerner - that means explained it so that a kindergartner could understand)
BrotherIvan
(9,126 posts)Thank you, but I'm sure it will be taken the wrong way by those that want to. And boy oh boy, do they want to.
Jefferson23
(30,099 posts)aspirant
(3,533 posts)including all Americans, there is no stopping him
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)No one event is a measure. I'm amazed that Bernie has lit up the nation as quickly as he has. People compare Bernie to Howard Dean, but Bernie is a far more seasoned politician with a much more realistic view of the world and on his campaign than even Howard Dean.
I think Bernie is pleasantly surprised by the reception thus far, the enthusiasm, the crowds, but I don't think he is overly optimistic. I think he realizes that he is speaking for millions and millions of Americans even though many of them don't know it yet.
That makes me very happy.
aspirant
(3,533 posts)sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)and are being dismissed and told 'everything is getting better' when we KNOW that is not the case.
And with the entire political system which people are sick to death of. It is not about THEM, it's about entertainment and money.
And it's old and jaded and more like an old vaudeville act at this point to the point where so many no longer even participate.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)outside who did not get in but were able to hear him.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)The goal posts have been moved however and now the naysayers think that 'crowds don't matter'! Lol Imagine if he had not filled that hall, how much they would have mattered then. All you can do is laugh.
donnasgirl
(656 posts)Seems to me Bernie is resonating with Blacks more than people want to admit.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)that if they really believe what they post, they have no CLUE what has been going on and are deeply insulting minorities which can only hurt their own candidate.
Yes, I did see that video and posted it in the Bernie Forum last week. Amazing young man and I hope more people get to see what he is doing for Bernie. Which is why I posted the link to the video and the link to his Utube account was provided in the thread.
Vattel
(9,289 posts)Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)by not taking any corporate money. I also wrote an OP in Bernie's forum about her run for office, she's in Washington State and since Bernie will need a large, Progressive Congress to help him when he is President, I think we should support people like Angie Marx also.
Just wanted to mention her as she is very brave to take that step imo.
So 'Angie For Congress' and 'Bernie for the WH'!
bunnies
(15,859 posts)Awesome post.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)out to such a large country, when he first announced and wondered how it would happen.
Now I see how starved people are for a real leader who is focused on what concerns them and THEY are doing the work for him.
It's amazing really!
bunnies
(15,859 posts)is just icing on the cake. People are connected. People can be heard. And no one has to choke down what pundits are trying to feed them. Supporters of the status-quo seem to be having a hard time accepting that their ways of thinking are (seemingly) on the way out.
The lying, the waffling and the flip-flopping is what turns people of to politics. Its what leads them to feel as though both parties are the same because in that respect, they are.
Bernie offers an honest, authentic alternative. Amazing indeed!!
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)are going to be informed. Especially the younger generation who do not watch the Corporate media at all. Which explains WHY they are so much more informed that the talking heads on Corporate Controlled Media.
Btw, in case you hadn't heard yet, but Bernie supporters have created Bernie TV where it will follow his campaign with volunteers make sure to get his campaign news out to the people.
They just started so we need to promote them wherever we can.
They are launching their project today by covering his Madison Event.
I posted the info in the Bernie Forum. They will be livestreaming the event and have people on the ground to talk to attendees and get their views on Bernie's 'revolution'.
It will start around 6.30 and I am going to watch it on their Utube channel!
bunnies
(15,859 posts)and Im waiting to hear from them about being involved. I live in NH so I should have plenty of opportunities.
I didnt realize they were starting tonight though. Guess I know what Ill do with my evening. I cant wait to see the crowd!
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)the Madison Event. They will start broadcasting at 6.30 PM. I posted the link to their Utube channel where we can follow Bernie's campaign from the ground throughout this campaign.
See here: http://www.democraticunderground.com/128018754
Right now they have a countdown to the event on the screen. Approx 3 hrs to go last time I checked!
bunnies
(15,859 posts)sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)marym625
(17,997 posts)Jwirr suggested it and we agreed. So it's right there with the pinned posts
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)marym625
(17,997 posts)I just agreed
You're welcome.
winter is coming
(11,785 posts)If his candidacy and ideas get traction, who knows what those peasants will be demanding next?
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)TRUTH. It's like finding gold in the political arena. Nothing they can do to stop the PEOPLE from supporting him. His record speaks for itself and all the angry, negative attempts to minimize the importance of having such a candidate step forward, only backfires on them.
WillyT
(72,631 posts)Dont call me Shirley
(10,998 posts)Blue_In_AK
(46,436 posts)lordsummerisle
(4,651 posts)Great post Sabrina 1!
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)stonecutter357
(12,697 posts)you should be ashamed of yourself.
marym625
(17,997 posts)So she couldn't have blocked you
Shame on you for accusing someone of doing something they couldn't have done and for doing it publicly. Shame on you for saying it here at all.
You have a problem with the Sanders group I suggest you take it up with a host, privately
Have a nice day
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)I didn't ban you.
I don't like all this "banning" stuff of good DUers. I am in the group that bans trolls from DU but I'm not very good at it because I never seem to spot objectionable posts. I don't know why. Maybe just my luck.
I'm interested in what people say and the various arguments. I rarely vote against posts when I am on a jury.
So, I did not ban you. If you know otherwise, please let me know the details.
I am sorry that you have been banned. Your avatar may have offended someone.
I have been banned from both the Obama and the Hillary groups. So I know how it feels. Some people are just peevish. Can't help themselves.
Rosa Luxemburg
(28,627 posts)sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)if you could help me say it in a more accurate way. 'Black, Latin, Asian and Muslim Americans? Does that sound better?
Rosa Luxemburg
(28,627 posts)Also Jews for Bernie
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)WomenForBernie, there is even a 'DogsForBernie' group complete with merchanize for dogs.
There are so many groups it would have taken up the entire page to list them all. Therefore I used a small sample of the groups that have started up over the past few weeks to make a point.
And that point is, and it seems most people did get it, that it is reprehensible to single out ONE GROUP of so many and insinuate they are not capable of finding out about Bernie to the point that HE must go find them when in fact there is no such problem. He hasn't made any special attempt to reach individual groups, he has succeeded in sewing the necessary seeds and the rest is beiing done by the people themselves.
So it is downright insulting to make it appear that ONLY AAs need to be specially treated when nothing could be further from the facts. It is imo, despicable to make such a claim about one group of people.
I will make a list in the Bernie Forum of as many of these activist groups as I can. It will be a very, very long post, and will have to be updated by the week, maybe even by the day.
Rosa Luxemburg
(28,627 posts)peacebird
(14,195 posts)George II
(67,782 posts)sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)Last edited Wed Jul 1, 2015, 04:36 PM - Edit history (1)
real meaning.
My point is, why are people singling out ONLY the AA community to target as 'needing Bernie to reach out' to them when the fact is as you say, starting from zero means he needs to reach out to ALL Americans. I find that to be very insulting frankly.
aspirant
(3,533 posts)any #'s is an IMPLOSION
Admiral Loinpresser
(3,859 posts)Martin O'Malley's numbers have gone up, but that is not an explosion (he is a good Democrat, btw). I could probably research the GOP polls and find somebody on that side who has come up. But there are no "explosions" except the laughable Donald Trump.
No, this movement for Bernie has exploded in outraising every Republican and raising more money from real people than ANY candidate. This movement has exploded in grassroots enthusiasm (we already have two Bernie groups in my small midwestern town). This movement has exploded into double digit national support beyond the predictions of the pundits only weeks ago. This movement has generated the largest and most enthusiastic crowds in the country, with standing room only, many of these events thrown together in a few days and on a shoestring budget. This movement is growing faster than any of the corporatists. And this movement is demanding justice for all. You ain't seen nothin' yet!
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)In October of 2014 Bernie was polling at 1%! But the minute people get to know him and his record, you are correct: We ain't nothing yet!
MuseRider
(34,119 posts)I live a little South of Topeka but do a lot of my things in your awesome town. I will check it out.
George II
(67,782 posts)...to flooding DU with their posts......yet......like the Sanders followers have.
Admiral Loinpresser
(3,859 posts)George II
(67,782 posts)Admiral Loinpresser
(3,859 posts)Bernie is one of the best fundraisers of all time, already. His earned media is on the ascent. You need those to win. Bernie's money comes from the grassroots. Hillary's comes from the decades old Clinton machine and Dark Money. Yuck.
George II
(67,782 posts)And on what do you base that conclusion?
Admiral Loinpresser
(3,859 posts)have raised $15M in candidate money in the two months after declaring? I think that is a short list. Go ahead and disprove me and I'll admit I was wrong. No Dark Money, just candidate money. Anybody get a quarter million donors in the two months after declaring? I'll bet that is a short list also. And he's hardly going to any fundraisers, compared to Hillary.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)you need to talk to the Admins about it. Before Bernie announced Hillary supporters were flooding the forum assuming she was already the nominee. But we live in a democracy and that means no one is guaranteed an election no matter how it may seem.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)That must mean there are at least 48 by now. And 72 by Friday!
hootinholler
(26,449 posts)2banon
(7,321 posts)sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)still coming in. Very exciting evening.
Btw, I love your sigline images. Have to get mine in case anyone doubts who I am supporting! Lol!
Crowd yelling: FEEL THE BERN!! Lol! Getting louder!
swilton
(5,069 posts)Bonobo
(29,257 posts)It is what I like to think I would have written if:
A. I was as expressive as you, and
B. If I didn't let being pissed off affect me so quickly.
Anyway, great, great OP. You hit every nail on the head.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)can contradict his long, impressive record. ANYONE calling themselves a Democrat who even tries to attack that RECORD, is imo, not worth repsonding to.
What's so great about finally having a Candidate like Bernie is that you NEVER, EVER have to defend him. I got used to trying to do with other candidates I supported and it is a very exhausting.
In THIS case, my response to the negative political attacks, is to post MORE of why we support him.
Thanks for your post, Bonobo ...
Bonobo
(29,257 posts)That is true wisdom.
You're so right!
cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)eom
PatrickforO
(14,587 posts)I agree with you. The word is getting out on Bernie because of all of us talking about him. Lord knows, it WON'T get out if we depend on the corporate-owned media.
Like an increasing number of people, I'm thinking Bernie might end up surprising lots of people and the establishment in general.
I'm supporting him!
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)his campaign. As he says though, and I believe he is right, this isn't just about HIM, this is a reaction by the people to the old, corrupt system where money rules and the people KNOW they do not matter.
They needed a voice, there was no one on the horizon and then Bernie took the responsibility to speak for them.
I'm watching the Madison Rally right now and it truly is awesome what is happening.
Maedhros
(10,007 posts)The Clinton campaign has done its homework.
On economic issues, Bernie Sanders wipes the floor with Hillary. It's not even close. Therefore, the Clinton campaign is staying as mute as possible on economic topics (cf. the TPP).
They have calculated - correctly - that their best chance comes from facing Bernie on the social justice battlefield. Bernie's long, consistent, and stellar record on civil rights still bests Hillary's, but the gap is not as glaring as on the economic front. Further, the Clinton campaign knows that they must convince primary voters that Hillary is a social justice warrior in order to propagate the "she's better than the Republicans" meme - without social justice credibility, she isn't any better than them.
The strategy they came up with is to start a whisper campaign questioning Bernie's commitment to social justice: Why doesn't he say more? Why is he concerned only with economic justice? He didn't really support gay marriage until Hillary did. The recent tragedy in Charleston, and the recent victory in the Supreme Court, were opportunities they seized to undermine Bernie's positions.
It's Atwater/Rove politics 101.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)Dems on their STRENGTHS. Civil Rights, IS Bernie's strength.
What they have NOT calculated on is that these are different times. That people are no longer UNAWARE of this despicable tactics.
That the minute they began to appear people instantly recognized them and responded quickly to expose them. Leaving the backlash against their candidate the end result, rather than what they intended.
They demonstrate ALL that is WRONG with the system AND WE CAN USE THEM as an example of WHY we need to totally reform the entire 'rigged' money driven system because it does not serve the American people.
Note how these early attempts have had ZERO impact on Bernie's campaign.
My response to these feeble and old tactics is 'just talk about where your candidate stands on the issues'. Let the people decide ON THE ISSUES, ON THEIR RECORDS who they believe is the best candidate for this COUNTRY, not the Big Banks, right now.
Maedhros
(10,007 posts)because in each and every case Bernie's stance is as good or better.
There is no issue on which Hillary is superior to Bernie, save two:
1. Selling one's self for political money.
2. Pushing military intervention.
Neither of those play well to traditional Democrats.
nxylas
(6,440 posts)If he did, that video of Hillary talking about "Hard-working Americans, white Americans" would be all over his campaign materials.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)so, did they start this "whisper campaign"? Or is Bernie's campaign now continuing it?
Aerows
(39,961 posts)Proof, or equate people talking about anything and everything as a "whisper campaign".
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)the subject of more than one OP over there. Last hide I got was pointing that out to someone who wrote the OP, but denies it in GD. So it seems they really thought they were whispering over there.
Aerows
(39,961 posts)is so off the wall and awful - but it was allowed to stand - yet you fear linking to it for FEAR of a hide... uh.
You lost me somewhere.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)there was no problem. While posting about solving it in the Sanders group- going as far as saying LOL! - that they should not respect anyone in GD who said the same fucking thing.
It was a laugh riot.
And yeah, I'd get alerted on again, and I'm over it.
well, at least we aren't bringing it back up again.
Vattel
(9,289 posts)Maedhros
(10,007 posts)on multiple issues - racial, LGBTQ, gun control - at the exact same time.
That leads me to think it was coordinated, and we're naive to think that the candidates don't have people working the various political forums.
Vattel
(9,289 posts)Gutierrez got the ball rolling with the remark about not knowing if Sanders likes immigrants. Usually I like Gutierrez, and I like to think that he just made a silly offhand remark because he didn't know much about Sanders. Be that as it may, others picked up on the idea and soon Joan Walsh jumped in with her stupid editorial that suggested that Bernie was out of touch with the issues that matter to POC and that, by contrast, Hillary understood and was addressing these issues. Then suddenly the meme that Bernie doesn't care enough about issues that pertain to women and minorities was everywhere.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)climate. They are SO out of touch with the American people that they have NO IDEA from inside their small elitist bubble, just how ANGRY the American people are.
My guess is that it is a Wall St/Third Way strategy. Those are the people who have the Think Tank, who pat themselves constantly on the back, actually thinking they are smarter than anyone else.
Eg two of the Third Way founders came out of the shadows a few months ago so ANGERED by the popularity of Elizabeth Warren that they just had to go public to ADMONISH HER because in their warped view 'ENOUGH IS ENOUGH', they mean of Warren's truth telling regarding them and their buddies on Wall St.
They chose Murdoch's WSJ to write their OP Ed to that 'naughty woman' who just wouldn't play the game and knowing her place, just STFU.
They THOUGHT this would settle the matter, after all the Masters of the Universe know what is good for ALL of us.
But the backlash they received must have stunned them. For the first time they got a taste of just how ANGRY the people they have no contact with, are. Since then they have refused to discuss that OP and have gone back into their shadowy place.
I hope they understand that we the people are all older and wiser than we were when they began to play their dirty political tricks.
Vattel
(9,289 posts)morningfog
(18,115 posts)KoKo
(84,711 posts)L0oniX
(31,493 posts)Bonobo
(29,257 posts)We will NOT sit on our hands and have some "inevitable" candidate selected for us.
We will NOT have a dynasty shoved down out throats, or a candidate that was given opportunities not possible for someone without the closest ties to the most powerful.
It is the voice of the true Democratic party shouting out now and Bernie just happens to represent US.
We will NOT have the lesser of two evils again or let the good cop/bad cop kabuki shell game determine how we deal with the vital next decade or so.
No, we will use our votes, our only true weapon.
We will claim those votes as our own and NOT sell them out cheaply! They are ours and belong to us!
Go, go, go Bernie! Represent us!
Rosa Luxemburg
(28,627 posts)so easy for MSM. Hillary vs. Jeb Jeb vs. Hillary Hillary vs. Jeb
People are already getting off their coaches and energizing. The fact is people are working 3 jobs or more and can't make ends meet. It's all very well going to college but students are hit by huge debts and are not able to get a job. People are cynical and do not trust politicians. At least Bernie speaks for the people.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)He did it as a part of his teaching the Republicans the REAL meaning of 'Family Values'. He said that it is NOT a family value when both mothers and fathers have to leave their children to work several jobs just to make ends meet. Not a family value when parents who have worked hard cannot afford to send their children to college.
And the crowd showed their appreciation that not only does he identify the problems, he offers solutions.
marym625
(17,997 posts)You're post is on the money. It's righteous. It's beautiful just like you!
Amen to this!
Standing ovation!
Woman, this just fucking rocks it!
Here's another Facebook page, AA4Bernie African Americans for Bernie Sanders, that I posted about before when they got the news out about the phony super package http://www.democraticunderground.com/128015162
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)Thank you for your kind words, I am psyched to see so much support for the first candidate I really feel I can support without any reservations.
marym625
(17,997 posts)rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)that we all know and love.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)that all by itself. Can't think of too many others who would be so hard to attack on the issues. Barbara Lee is one, voted with Bernie against the Patriot Act and the Iraq War at a time when to do so was very personally risky. Remember the Anthrax case, delivered to Dems who were hesitant?
Barbara Lee had to get protection. Bernie I'm sure was attacked fiercely. But they were right.
Would love to see her in his Admins, VP maybe.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)marym625
(17,997 posts)And then they were swept away.
It's very difficult to argue something when the facts prove differently. Even harder to do so when the falsehoods spewed forth are true of the candidate you support.
Those damn historic records and facts just always get in the way
kwassa
(23,340 posts)I am puzzled by the singling out of ONLY AAs who are as capable as any other group of following this election and deciding who best represents them. AND taking action without anyone holding their hands.
..............................
So please do not single out any group of people and assume they, more than any other group, need to have the way pointed out to them. That is pretty insulting imho.
This is where the disconnect is, at this moment.
It is not about holding hands, or having the way pointed out to them. That is not now, nor ever been what some of us have been talking about.
Bernie may have marched with MLK fifty years ago, but what has he done to address the specific concerns of African-Americans lately? Nothing, as far as we can see.
His refusal to address these concerns is the problem, easily rectified. He has, to date, made no attempt to do so. Bernie avoided dealing with these concerns in the NPR interview I listened to, actively ducking the question.
It is up to Bernie to fix this. I hope he sees the importance of it.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)'concern' doesn't resonate. I eg, don't 'worry' about other candidates and whether or not they are 'reaching out' to anyone. THAT is for their supporters to worry about.
It's an old and despicable tactic to use women and minorities for political purposes, but we are now in an era where people are very, very aware of these old tricks.
It's personal, put it that way.
Don't worry about Bernie and his supporters, they are doing just fine, and please stop singling out AAs from the hundreds of groups who are working AS THEY ARE, to get the word out about Bernie. It is offensive.
As for a 'few groups'. I used just a few examples as to list all of them would require pages.
Every day there are more.
Now I prefer to keep this an ISSUES BASED election. Not the old way of 'politics of personal destruction' or 'rovian tactics' which waste time, as intended, NOT talking about issues. And are exactly what the public is sick and tired of.
But if I were to be 'concerned' about another candidate I would be concerned that Hillary is not reaching out at all.
The AA community was offended by her lack of knowledge of the Movement 'Black Lives Matter' evidenced by the remark she made in a Black Church. You need to reach out to those who were offended on HER behalf, NOT spend your time worrying about candidates you do not support.
Where does your candidate stand on the TPP? THAT issue is driving the Unions, see my other OP in this forum, into the arms of Sen. Sanders. As the powerful head of the CWA Union stated 'we will not forget her silence'.
t
However, your candidate is NOT my concern, I will work to get MY candidate elected and will not allow a single lie or smear about him to pass without correcting it with facts.
If you don't want to spend your time getting your candidate elected, but prefer to 'worry' other candidates, a complete waste of good energy imo, there isn't much I can do about it.
Very well said!
kwassa
(23,340 posts)I don't have a candidate, yet.
Your declaring that I do is your way of avoiding the question that I asked, that is all.
There is no one in this election that excites me, frankly. Hillary doesn't excite me, nor does Bernie, because he is unelectable, in my humble opinion.
All I am doing is pointing out an obvious flaw in Bernie's campaign, because I personally heard him do it. Sorry if that offends you. If Bernie wants to win he needs to do a lot better than this.
I am pointing out, once more, that you have not answered my concern about Bernie, nor has anyone else. It is not my concern alone, but the concern of many voters.
I don't expect you to answer it, because you can't. All you are doing is deflecting.
BainsBane
(53,066 posts)either in percentage of people of color or in the overall percentage of Democrats supporting Sanders. He remains around 12-15 percent, though Hillary has gained on him recently in the Real Clear Politics Average. http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2016/president/us/2016_democratic_presidential_nomination-3824.html
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)Bernie neck and neck with Hillary in critical states. The states where he is now known. That is going to spread as more people get to know him.
And he's doing it all without Corporate Money.
And without the help of the Corporate media.
It is amazing how fast he has gone from 1% in Oct to 32% in Iowa after less than two months of campaigning.
Once people know him and learn about him, they are onboard. As I said, that is the biggest challenge but his army of volunteers are handling that and each day more people are joining his campaign.
Locrian
(4,522 posts)Add to that the lack of substance in the corporate backed candidates vs the depth and honesty and you have a huge potential for swing over.
The corporate candidates have create a "don't say or be controversial" bubble around them as they try to ride the the "vanilla statistics" fence. It's immediately transparent especially when someone comes along and DOESN'T PLAY THE GAME.
And that's the key and what we want and find most refreshing: NOT PLAYING the same old game of kiss up (to the monied corporate class) and kick down to the 99%
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)plan how to deceive us with all their 'advisers' and 'experts' as if we were simple minded and don't seem to get how much smarter the people are once they know the facts.
People are truly offended by the condescension that is so apparent in these campaigns. They are treated as if they are preparing an ad campaign for a terrible product to dress it up and make it look good.
And they think we will fall for that.
They are so out of touch with the people as was apparent with the attempt to smear Bernie with a word that represents a terrible phase in our relatively recent history only to find out that today's generation is more afraid of the word that describes their policies, Capitalism.
Bernie tells the truth, he shies away from NOTHING while they gather around to try to 'figure out how to talk to the 'people' for one purpose only, to get the votes they need to maintain the power structure that has been set up fearing that it is now exposed for what it is.
Truth is so much easier, it never changes, no one needs to meet with a bevy of 'advisers' to determine how to talk AT the people.
Bernie simply tells the truth and names names. Finally someone who isn't inclined to 'reach across the aisle' and capitulate to bigots and Koch bought morons who slap down the extended hand every time and only demand MORE capitulation. He is far more likely to do what he did to Greenspan and in doing so, far more likely to gain their respect if not their agreement.
All the reaching across the aisle has only empowered the extremists to stamp their feet and ask for more, like spoiled children with ineffective parents.
That won't happen when they are faced with someone who isnt' impressed by their temper tantrums.
Locrian
(4,522 posts)The straight talk and not ducking the questions (or falling for the soundbites) will be seen by the media as not playing their game, and they will likely go on attack or deride mode.
But it has the real potential (the straight talk) of coming in like a hurricane. Once people see the contrast with the evasiveness, word games, etc it's starkly apparent who's merely playing the corporate "safe" game and who is actually interested in the people.
At that point, the corporate "game" falls apart like the bullshit talking points and plastic talking heads they really are.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)playing. Frank Luntz eg, didn't hide HIS fear when he saw the huge success of Occupy Wall St, which was the first public outcry against the corrupt system they have created.
He said about OWS I am terrified of this movement'.
Bernie was not only NOT terrified of it, he was an early and eager supporter of a movement that finally brought attention to much of what he had been trying to get out there.
Luntz is right to be terrified of the people knowing what they are up to. He must be shivering in his boots over Bernie.
Someone described OWS as 'the seed that was planted by the people' and Bernie as 'the fruit of that seed'.
No wonder OWS has finally entered the political arena endorsing Sanders as the only candidate who gains their trust.
Locrian
(4,522 posts)People are fed up. The hate filled GOP, out of control cops, destruction of the lower, middle class, half truths and politically calculated speeches etc is pushing people to finally realize they can't sit on the sidelines and do nothing. The media circus, corporate bullshit is getting old - people don't buy into the corporate pablum that they are pushing.
They want REAL change - they see the problems building and they want to stop the same old lies and half truths that come out of EVERY politician that the corporate overlords pick for us to provide entertainment and distractions while feeling we have a "choice".
Seems like a pretty clear choice.
There will be dirty tricks coming - which could easily backfire of course. And there will be powerful money thrown around - which will work to convince a lot of people still not willing or able to see thru the lies. But its a real chance that things could come together.
And THAT would be AWESOME.
marym625
(17,997 posts)Hmm. 33% + 15% = 47% 55%-5% = 50%.
I give it 2 months and we're and ahead passed the margin of error.
Plus having crowds larger than anyone and above the response that are coming.
http://time.com/3943994/bernie-sanders-hillary-clinton-iowa/
He's not going to be in the rear view mirror much longer. She will be in his
midnight
(26,624 posts)davidpdx
(22,000 posts)Looks very informative, but I'll need awhile to sit down and carefully go through it.
ejbr
(5,856 posts)I disparately wanted to vote for Hillary this time around. To FINALLY have female energy leading this great nation (yes, she is still odds on favorite), but Bernie speaks my language. His subtle fuck the status quo stance aligns with me more than Ms. Clinton. No doubt, I will vote for her should it come to that, but now it's all about Bernie.
marym625
(17,997 posts)Because he speaks truth. Because he speaks from the heart. Because he speaks for all Americans and especially those with no voice. Because he consistent, constant and has the personal and political records to back it up. Because he didn't stop fighting for equality when he left college but continued and continues that fight in office. He has cosponsored, introduced and voted for bills to strengthen America and to give a hand to those in need without shame. Because his belief in equality is real and proven. Because he is no hypocrite and wants too big to fail, not to exist and doesn't pander to Wall Street. He doesn't speak what the polls say he should. He doesn't avoid the tough questions and he doesn't talk about how corporate profits and corporate welfare will help us all, yet another trickle down bullshit pandering to the oligarchs.
Because I know that by empowering you, I am empowered and vice versa, and Bernie Sanders knows this too.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)is nowhere near enough to get my support. Bernie's long record of standing up on important issues WHEN IT MATTERED and when it was NOT EASY, demonstrates true leadership qualities to me.
Getting it wrong on several issues, such as Iraq and the Patriot Act, even the hedging on torture, the anti-Marriage equality stance as late as a few years ago, scares me as to what her judgement might be again on the next important issue.
It's fine to 'evolve' and later admit to 'mistakes', but not when you are a powerful leader in a position where your being wrong can cost lives and deny Civil Rights to all Americans.
I am glad you have found a candidate who speaks your language, and thank you for your comment. People are speaking FOR you, and for ME as a woman, claiming they KNOW what we need. I and apparently YOU are perfectly capable of making decisions without their assistance.
Together the people can win this. Maybe that is why there is so much effort to divide people.
I am glad to see it isn't working this time. We do need a Political Revolution and only a united people have the power to make it happen.
ejbr
(5,856 posts)IronLionZion
(45,528 posts)We do exist
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)taking matters into their hands and supporting Bernie regardless of the 'conventional wisdom' claiming that they need, what apparently white voters don't need, some kind of special treatment. I found that claim to be very offensive frankly.
We need an army working together as he says, to help him in this battle. And divisive tactics will not work this time as we are seeing from the incredible coalition of people who are working together to get him elected and HEARD.
Happy to be part of Bernie's Political Revolution with so many wonderful people!
IronLionZion
(45,528 posts)that's the only reason more minorities support her, because more people of all types know her name.
And as more people get to know Bernie, his support has been growing tremendously!
I also think it's hilarious that some people think I might want or need special treatment. It is condescending in a way. I think Bernie's policies benefit more Americans of all types than any other candidate's policies.
stonecutter357
(12,697 posts)nc4bo
(17,651 posts)Beagle One
(56 posts)Bernie just needed to expand on his issues a little, and boy did he do his job.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)end such tactics. That is the beauty of being a supporter of a candidate with such an incredible record on Civil Rights across the board.
When I see people attempting to dismiss his incredible record on Civil Rights 'because the Civil Rights Movement was 50 years ago' it hurts, and it must hurt those who were there, many still with us still fighting like Bernie.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)How does that saying go 'in a time of universal deception, telling the truth is viewed as a 'desperate' act?
I think I just messed that up, but it fits I think so I'll stick with it!
raouldukelives
(5,178 posts)I am so amazed at the amount of enthusiasm for Bernie! I don't know why, they are being drawn by the same things that have always drawn me.
No corporate think tanks, no finely groomed appearances, no Frank Luntz's, no focus groups, no timidity in facing the public, no fear of the "Gotcha Liberal Media".
I still think most people are savvy enough to discern the real thing, they just need to see and hear it again. If this keeps up, they can't help but hear him. Ain't nothing like the real thing.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)see it that it's easy to think we are not savvy enough, since we haven't been tested that often.
But now we actually are seeing it and people are proving you right. When they see it they recognize it.
'Ain't nothing like the real thing' ~ you can say that again!
davidpdx
(22,000 posts)Got back home a bit ago and sat down to read it. A post with a ton of good information complied in one place.
marym625
(17,997 posts)Or if they went back to multiple recs being allowed.
But I can kick it again!
Bonobo
(29,257 posts)marym625
(17,997 posts)I love to with you!
Rosa Luxemburg
(28,627 posts)marym625
(17,997 posts)NorthCarolina
(11,197 posts)When America was finally able to free itself from the grasp of the oligarchs, and become a more inclusive and compassionate country that works to improve the lot of it's people.
Oilwellian
(12,647 posts)You always write such inspiring posts and I was reminded of an inspiring story that I want to share.
As a preface to the story...I supervised our local Head Start's Family Services and Parent Involvement components during the 90's when Bill Clinton signed the Welfare Reform Bill. The AA community's reaction was not a good one for the Clinton brand, at least not in the poor communities we served.
I have since retired from the position and have remained friends with many in the AA communities that we served. They still haven't forgotten how Clinton sold them down the river. And yes, you are correct, they are very savvy politically and keenly understand what is going on. When I recently mentioned Bernie to one of them, they were already very well aware of his work in the civil rights movement, and knew he had a long, consistent record of advocating for minorities.
Although I couldn't be too political with Head Start parents and push for any particular candidate during those years, I did hold workshops and taught them how to be advocates in their communities. This is what spawned an inspiring event.
Two of our Head Start centers offered full day services to parents who worked or were in school. The money for those centers came in the form of a federal block grant with specific rules that disallowed any state from charging Head Start parents 10% of their income for daycare. In Virginia, those funds were controlled by a daycare commission who meted out the money to Head Start centers across the state, and made sure that all of the eligibility requirements were met by each center.
When George Allen became our governor, he got rid of the daycare commission and allowed state Social Services to take control of the block grant money. In turn, Social Services planned to start charging Head Start parents 10% of their income if it was over a certain amount. It was a devastating blow for many of our parents who fell just above the poverty level and would be subjected to this fee. At the time we didn't know there was a rule attached to this federal money that disallowed this fee. But that quickly changed.
One of our parents who was going to be affected by this fee, went to a campaign rally being held by our local state rep at the time, Chip Woodrum. During a question and answer session at the rally, she asked him why Head Start parents would have to start paying 10% of their income for daycare. He wasn't aware that was about to occur and promised to look into it. He kept that promise and appointed a staff member to investigate the issue, and that she did. It was she who discovered the federal rule attached to the block grant money, and it quickly became a rally cry for all Head Start programs across the state.
Allen and his republican minions tried to drag their feet and ignore the glaring requirements attached to this money, I guess in the hopes it would just quiet down and go away. But I worked ferociously behind the scenes with Chip Woodrums assistant, and without her help and the effort of other state legislators who were advocating for their Head Start parents, it probably would have gone Allen's way. In the end, due to legalities and political pressure from many Head Start parents across the state, Allen finally backed down right before the fee was to be implemented.
I share this story because it's a great example of how one person really can make a difference. It began with one Head Start parent asking one simple question, and it quickly ballooned into a statewide effort that succeeded in preventing thousands of hard working and studying parents from falling into poverty. We didn't have computers at the time, but the press was involved in most Virginia cities and they played an important role in the success of our statewide effort. Watching a minority group of mostly women, back George Fucking Allen down, was a site to behold and probably one of my greatest achievements in life.
The Head Start parent who asked that question will always be one of my dearest friends. She went on to get her degree in Psychology and is now the director of a mental health clinic that serves poor people. We all learned so many valuable lessons with that experience, and it was such a wonderful example for all of those who felt they had no power in this world, to learn that they actually did. It just takes commitment, organization, and a belief in a cause to make it so.
Feel the Bern?
BrotherIvan
(9,126 posts)Excellent post. More people need to read that WE have the power if we want to take it.
Bonobo
(29,257 posts)sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)It is very inspiring.
What bothers me and so many other people here is the disingenuous use of AAs for political purposes. I know for a fact that there are many people here, minorities included, who have, as you have, seen up close the terrible effects of poverty particularly in minority communities, which imo is a direct result of racism and bigotry, such as Conservative policies which in every way make sure that these communities never have the economic opportunities that would empower them.
Then we see incredible claims that Bernie's, AND MLK's and Jesse Jackson's among others', insight into the fact that this is exactly what must change, equal economic opportunities, ARE WRONG.
How on EARTH can anyone, with the audacity to speak on behalf of all AAs actually deny this reality, and to do it simply for the purpose of politics?
I am very glad to see that this particular tactic is being called out everywhere. And by those who are being used themselves.