But the math leaves plenty of room for she and others to grow.

on average. If that is record breaking, then that is record breaking. It makes me curious to see what kind of message/politician can really break through in fundraising. I think a $100MM quarter is possible with the right message and deliverer.

If 91 people give somewhere between 1 and 99 dollars, that would be 91 donations
if 9 people gave between 100 and 2700 dollars, that would be 9 donations

In this scenario, 91% of the donations would not be 91% of the cash.

If there were a lot of large donations......the 9% could be providing most of the money.

I wish I trusted Hillary Clinton. I don't wish I trusted her supporters because all political support comes with a lot of illusions and irrational exuberance; "trust" barely enters the conversation.

But I wish I trusted her.

they sat around and tried to figure out how make it look as if she is not a candidate of the rich. this 91% giving $100 or less misdirection is excellent work on their part.

the total number of donors for Hillary is about 134,000 but it is probably higher

91% is 121,940 if all of the small donors gave the max of $100 (which of course they didn't....that would only be $12.194 million out of the $45 million

Probably 80-85% from those big Hillary fundraisers

and cannot contribute any further to Clinton.

I'm more interested in hearing the Q3 numbers and after the debates....

Bernie is gaining union support and new voters DAILY by tens of thousands.

Both interpretation means there are millions of people who are likely voters who are also likley donors.

of donations under a nickel.

I appreciate these alternative calculations and narratives to the record breaking fund raising.